LUDMILLA engagement report
@Ludmilla - 11M followers on X
Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 29, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 11M followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Posts are seen about 69K times each, and 1.47% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.624% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 70% carry an image or video and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 81K interactions, about 79x its own typical post.
Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 29, 2026. Recurring tag: #fragmentos.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.009%, LUDMILLA sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.696% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.9% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 70% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 20% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 70% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 20% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 98 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 25, 202679x their median
Explode https://t.co/iHOTYxk4zQ
- Mar 29, 202666x their median
A MILENA REAGINDO A MÚSICA NOVA DA LUDMILLA KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK https://t.co/fRFjzrChVn
- May 2, 202623x their median
Fui buscar a calça da @Ludmilla pra ir pro show da @shakira e ainda levei uma pipoca junto 😂 Look aprovado? https://t.co/PiTjukySja
- Oct 8, 202642x their median
Casei com a mulher da minha vida e a gente construiu uma família linda. Feliz dia da visibilidade lésbica, amo minhas garota💕 https://t.co/9JbwX32dZJ
- Mar 29, 202620x their median
Que loucura a casa do @bbb gente. Adorei. A Chai mto engraçada, Tia Milena uma figura, Ana Paula craque do jogo… Todo mundo numa vibe boa. Por mim ficaria lá
- Apr 6, 202612x their median
O marketing que fizeram hoje foi super infeliz, não foi alinhado comigo e nem com a minha equipe, não foi nada legal. O combinado foi outro eu Não curti.
- Mar 29, 20269.6x their median
rindooooooo #BBB26 #RedeBBB https://t.co/bXGHSkXn2l
- Sep 17, 20268.2x their median
já deu a falta de respeito de algumas páginas de twitter comigo, já deu por anos eu relevei muita coisa achando que em algum momento vocês iam parar e começar a me respeitar enquanto ser humano, mas pelo visto não foi possível então agora acabou, tolerância 0 pra fake news, distorção, coisa que eu não falei sendo colocada na minha boca, tudo isso vai ser tratado juridicamente não vou mais discutir, explicar nem pedir respeito, meus advogados vão resolver a partir de agora
- May 18, 20267.7x their median
Vai Brasil 🇧🇷 https://t.co/HLeBaZ3qxa
- Mar 29, 20267.2x their median
Ela sabe que meu emoji é um limão, ela não é inocente
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 11M followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Posts are seen about 69K times each, and 1.47% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.624% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 70% carry an image or video and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 81K interactions, about 79x its own typical post.
- What is LUDMILLA's engagement rate on X?
- LUDMILLA (@Ludmilla) has an engagement rate of 0.009%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 11,085,758 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.009%, LUDMILLA sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Ludmilla have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @Ludmilla post?
- Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.53 posts per day across the measured window.