Back to @LouieDi13's profile

B I G L O U I E 🫵🏾 engagement report

@LouieDi13 - 1.1M followers on X

Measured over 285 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.022%
of 1.1M followers
Per impression
0.493%
50K views on a typical post
Reach
4.53%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
248
interactions (median)
Saved
0.004%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
33.77/day
active 100% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 248 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.022%. Measured over 285 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 50K times each, and 0.493% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.53% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 33.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 285 posts sampled, 42% carry an image or video and 7% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 118K interactions, about 474x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bet9jacode, #fc27, #eafc27.

Measured over 285 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #bet9jacode, #fc27, #eafc27.

Compared with accounts its own size

B I G L O U I E 🫵🏾's engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 30% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.022%, B I G L O U I E 🫵🏾 sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,349 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.696%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,349 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,452 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.696%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video42% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link2% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 42% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 80 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 2, 2026474x their median

    🩵🇦🇷 Enzo Fernández: “I always dreamed to be in a club as big as Manchester City”. “This is a dream move for me. I’m really happy”. https://t.co/EXwi2wjMFh

    97K6.0K7.8K6.9K9.3M viewsView on X
  • Oct 22, 2026421x their median

    Sentences you’ve never heard before: AFC Bournemouth have beaten AC Milan. https://t.co/Ltj3EUJvkx

    93K9.3K8351.6K1.5M viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 2026322x their median

    The 3 players that show green , plays outside the intensity league btw 😂 https://t.co/x87HI7NIc3

    74K5.1K6664092.7M viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 2026321x their median

    ✨🇫🇷 Rayan Cherki: “My connection with Michael Olise is real and strong. Don’t believe everything you see in the media”. “This group is fantastic”. https://t.co/9eNcLuHCAu

    76K2.8K323621.7M viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 2026320x their median

    Robot no believe the weight of human punch😭😭 https://t.co/F8Q8JtyD6p

    65K9.6K1.9K2.6K9.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 2026317x their median

    ALEXANDER ISAK WHAT A GOAL! 🤯 https://t.co/WufpnIlTOs

    74K3.8K2563702.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026261x their median

    🚨🇺🇦 Mykhaylo Mudryk has suffered an injury and will be sidelined for 6-8 weeks from now. Tottenham signed Mudryk from Chelsea on Deadline Day, deal on loan with £75m buy option clause not mandatory. https://t.co/SvGVSQk9Hb

    56K3.1K2.3K2.9K6.2M viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 2026258x their median

    Film Title: One Spoon Of Chocolate. 🎬 https://t.co/X14OGTA2Nn

    59K4.4K433124992K viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 2026246x their median

    🔵⚪️ 6 wins in a row in all competitions for Brighton! Fabian Hürzeler’s side currently flying in Premier League. https://t.co/iVtPaV15au

    58K2.6K4242311.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026232x their median

    Rest in power, Alhaji Taiwo Hassan. Icon, King, Ogogo! 🕊️ https://t.co/2LEBa0KToJ

    49K7.8K426294692K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bet9jacode#fc27#eafc27#fut#ultimateteam

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 248 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.022%. Measured over 285 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 50K times each, and 0.493% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.53% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 33.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 285 posts sampled, 42% carry an image or video and 7% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 118K interactions, about 474x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bet9jacode, #fc27, #eafc27.

What is B I G L O U I E 🫵🏾's engagement rate on X?
B I G L O U I E 🫵🏾 (@LouieDi13) has an engagement rate of 0.022%, based on the median interactions across 285 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,111,466 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.022%, B I G L O U I E 🫵🏾 sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,349 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LouieDi13 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LouieDi13 post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 33.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going