Back to @LifeMathMoney's profile

LifeMathMoney engagement report

@LifeMathMoney - 373K followers on X

Measured over 57 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.048%
of 373K followers
Per impression
1.38%
13K views on a typical post
Reach
3.49%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
180
interactions (median)
Saved
0.307%
40 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.8/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
05:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 180 interactions against 373K followers, an engagement rate of 0.048%. Measured over 57 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 1.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.50% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 57 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.3K interactions, about 46x its own typical post.

Measured over 57 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

LifeMathMoney's engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 56% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.048%, LifeMathMoney sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.696%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,482 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,403 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.696%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video44% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link11% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 44% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 11% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 354 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 9, 202646x their median

    And are they teaching young women how to treat men and boys? Probably not. https://t.co/M9WBZHqLGd

    6.9K540766108175K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202626x their median

    I go to a very high end gym in my city. Lots of girls in my gym wear clothes so thin that you can basically see the outline of their nipples and vaginas. I'm happy they do it (I'm a red blooded male) But I'm also glad I have a son and not a daughter in this environment https://t.co/UyHBM5vH3t

    4.1K117339141.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202625x their median

    If a man cries around a woman she will either get the ick or use it against him later. Often both. https://t.co/FkQoQEz0hW

    4.0K2162513778K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202621x their median

    "If any Hindu thinks that there should be no Muslim in Bharat, he will not remain Hindu. If you call yourself Hindu, you must believe all paths are leading to the same goal," says RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat in New York https://t.co/W7u0uvQrS6

    2.3K2626564951.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202619x their median

    "Dal has a lot of protein" https://t.co/WUyGA0DELL

    3.2K1458434154K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 202610x their median

    People who are not intellectually gifted tend to be much more cunning than smart people. This is because they need to resort to cunning to get ahead. People who are both cunning and intelligent (Peter Thiel) are extremely dangerous. People who are cunning, intelligent, and psychopathic (Putin) are forces of nature.

    1.6K15825268K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20267.4x their median

    Modern dating is basically prostitution. The guy expects sex. The girl expects money, gifts, and other favors. There is no love, no effort, and no respect. It's just casual sex with a transactional exchange. And that's basically the definition of prostitution.

    1.1K17020424K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20265.5x their median

    The brightest and most enterprising people in the world are Americans. Anyone who travels frequently will attest to this. They are highly extroverted, willing to take risks, and value competency over ethnicity/nepotism. This is why they are so successful as a country. If they can preserve these traits, they will stay on the top forever.

    8876725427K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20263.8x their median

    how she started how did she become https://t.co/3dBkxW5m8n

    585284321537K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20263.7x their median

    Marriage. Don't do it. Consider yourself WARNED. https://t.co/attBgQGX9d

    5391782222.0M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 180 interactions against 373K followers, an engagement rate of 0.048%. Measured over 57 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 1.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.50% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 57 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.3K interactions, about 46x its own typical post.

What is LifeMathMoney's engagement rate on X?
LifeMathMoney (@LifeMathMoney) has an engagement rate of 0.048%, based on the median interactions across 57 original posts from the last 30 days against 372,907 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.048%, LifeMathMoney sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LifeMathMoney have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LifeMathMoney post?
Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going