Man of Letters. engagement report
@Letter_to_Jack - 374K followers on X
Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 360 interactions against 374K followers, an engagement rate of 0.096%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 2.32% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 39% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 46x its own typical post.
Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026. Recurring tag: #ogundecides2027.
Compared with accounts its own size
Man of Letters.'s engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 71% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.096%, Man of Letters. sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,186 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.147% |
| 75th percentile | 0.698% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.9% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 39% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 39% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 284 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 10, 202646x their median
$400k in 4 days GOD IS THE GREATEST 💰
- Mar 30, 202641x their median
JUST IN: Air Canada CEO to resign following backlash for posting condolence video in English only.
- Aug 31, 202634x their median
Incase arsenal and benfica wan do rubbish 👍 https://t.co/o50TMlIvLw
- Sep 10, 202627x their median
Ogogo’s brother just posted this video of them together….. just listen to what Ogogo was saying in the video🥹💔 https://t.co/SzUmKjvuGP
- Sep 11, 202626x their median
Cele people which location is this one? https://t.co/f0UPStdQrC
- Aug 31, 202622x their median
The fact that Chelsea thought they were smarter than us throughout this Enzo Fernández saga is amusing. Let me break it down: We showed interest in Enzo. We Didn’t bid. Chelsea set a deadline, we didn’t pay. We kept tabs on him, agreed personal terms with him. Still didn’t bid. We waited till deadline day. Chelsea scouted his replacement. That’s when we’ve dropped our bid. Chelsea now pressured, either you sell him to us at the price we drop, or keep an unhappy player you’ve already replaced which you’ll sell cheaper later in the future. They thought they were playing chess, they didn’t know Hugo Viana is Garry Kasparov.
- Aug 30, 202620x their median
Who dindinrin pass among them 😂 https://t.co/GESgvpbwRr
- Aug 31, 202611x their median
You've conceded 5 goals this season I've conceded 1 shot on target We are not the same
- Sep 11, 20267.2x their median
This is how terrible the apps support in Android foldable is most of the apps is just over sized and blown up versions of smartphones apps The apps experience and os experience is alone a major reason iPhone duo wins https://t.co/6HKLGAP3SP
- Oct 2, 20266.7x their median
I said "Lagos" is the only South West state without a Yoruba name so people can't be mandated to speak Yoruba. Someone said the Yoruba name is "Eko". I told him "Eko" is from the Benin Kingdom. He blocked me. Your identity has been erased by the Portuguese and Bini siince. 😂
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 360 interactions against 374K followers, an engagement rate of 0.096%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 2.32% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 39% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 46x its own typical post.
- What is Man of Letters.'s engagement rate on X?
- Man of Letters. (@Letter_to_Jack) has an engagement rate of 0.096%, based on the median interactions across 36 original posts from the last 30 days against 374,235 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.096%, Man of Letters. sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,186 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Letter_to_Jack have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Letter_to_Jack post?
- Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.63 posts per day across the measured window.