Back to @Ledger's profile

Ledger engagement report

@Ledger - 679K followers on X

Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.028%
of 679K followers
Per impression
0.876%
22K views on a typical post
Reach
3.19%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
189
interactions (median)
Saved
0.023%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.13/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 189 interactions against 679K followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 0.876% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.18% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 84% carry an image or video, 31% are part of a thread and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 64x its own typical post.

Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ledger's engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 43% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.028%, Ledger sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,825 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9983.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,825 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,436 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video84% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link9% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 84% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 9% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 211 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 4, 202664x their median

    Friday GIVEAWAY anyone? We thought we'd end the week on a high and give you the chance to win a Ledger Nano Gen5. Here's how to enter: 1. RT this post 2. Follow @ledger 3. Comment which color Ledger signer you'd like to win It's THAT simple. Lets go. 🔒 https://t.co/QQRoCrpUrg

    3.5K4.1K4.3K145290K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 202629x their median

    Ledger is not affected by the recently published Coldcard Mk3 advisory. Ledger devices use a certified True Random Number Generator (TRNG) built directly into our Secure Element chip, generating full 256 bits of entropy for every 24-word Secret Recovery Phrase. Please refer to this article for more information: https://t.co/wYlVHAeiVX Coinkite has published a security advisory regarding certain Coldcard Mk3 firmware versions - you can read their notice here: https://t.co/uHkzcCWoBW

    4.5K55230686410K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202612x their median

    You just gave an AI agent API access. Do you know what happens if that connection gets compromised? Agents move fast, and the final say should sit with you, on a device you control. An agentic world needs a hardware root of trust. https://t.co/AFhvk9p13L

    1.4K6251301240K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20269.3x their median

    Unpopular Opinion: We should rename “Bitcoin hardware wallets” to “Bitcoin signing devices.” It’d fix so many problems in understanding for Bitcoin beginners and make it evident why a passphrase is needed. Everything is a @SeedSigner with extra steps and tradeoffs.

    1.5K1175564242K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20269.0x their median

    you know who supports 157 chains? this guy 👇 https://t.co/Zo1wYX9UBk

    1.1K529101438K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20268.9x their median

    Ledger Op3n 2026 is coming. Save the date: October 15. This year AI started acting for you, inside software it can outsmart. We're talking about how you stay in charge: what you verify, and where you verify it. https://t.co/9mlCBpGk8Q

    1.2K2851672668K viewsView on X
  • Nov 10, 20259.9x their median

    You can now secure your HYPE (@HyperliquidX’s native token) and other HyperEVM ecosystem tokens directly in Ledger Wallet! With Ledger + Ledger Wallet, you can: → Send & receive HYPE → Swap securely in-app Hyperliquid is one of the fastest-growing L1 blockchains in crypto, with billions in weekly trading volume and over $5B in TVL - and HyperEVM, its Ethereum-compatible smart contract layer, is powering the next wave of on-chain DeFi innovation. Now you can access it all securely and seamlessly with Ledger Wallet. 🔒

    1.1K17013543124K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20265.7x their median

    USDC on @arc is live in Ledger Wallet™, secured from Day 1. We're giving the community a reason to spread the word. To enter: 🔁 Repost this 👥 Follow @Ledger 💬 Tag someone still leaving their hard-earned dollars unsecured on software wallets. https://t.co/a2yFl9dkdE

    521287262943K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20265.2x their median

    Whoever - or whatever - controls your phone's software controls your phone's screen. When software can be fooled and AI does the fooling, trust has to live somewhere else. https://t.co/nzXNrlWvJM

    8039084326K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20265.2x their median

    Markets are green. You know what to do. 🟢🔒 Buy. Sell. Manage it all from Ledger Wallet™. https://t.co/F7kiABDgd2

    73388144926K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 189 interactions against 679K followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 0.876% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.18% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 84% carry an image or video, 31% are part of a thread and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 64x its own typical post.

What is Ledger's engagement rate on X?
Ledger (@Ledger) has an engagement rate of 0.028%, based on the median interactions across 55 original posts from the last 30 days against 679,063 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.028%, Ledger sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,825 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Ledger have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Ledger post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going