Back to @LeastAuthority's profile

Least Authority engagement report

@LeastAuthority - 166K followers on X

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.002%
of 166K followers
Per impression
0.361%
830 views on a typical post
Reach
0.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.27/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 3 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 166K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Posts are seen about 830 times each, and 0.361% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.499% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.8K interactions, about 922x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, Least Authority sits below the 10th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,098 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,393 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video33% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 33% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 166 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Dec 10, 2025922x their median

    🔹 Right to life 🔹 Freedom 🔹 Justice Human rights belong to all of us. They are non-negotiable. We all have a role to play in upholding them for every human being. https://t.co/Oka89KYyuo — via @UNHumanRights #HumanRightsDay https://t.co/VnwEfI1afu

    1.5K7544078097K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 2025341x their median

    Introducing the Audit Marketplace 🔺 If you’re building on Avalanche and looking to get your project audited, explore the Audit Marketplace with 20+ trusted providers! Built by @areta_io https://t.co/dWHRqvPGNQ

    441111399051K viewsView on X
  • Apr 14, 2026128x their median

    1/ We've teamed up with @ethereumfndn Trillion Dollar Security Initative, @nethermind, and @chainlinklabs to bring $1m in audit subsidies to @ethereum builders! The Ethereum Security Subsidy Program is a joint initiative with top-tier audit providers, anchored by an Expert Committee with leading minds from some of the organizations who know Ethereum the best. Ethereum has long been at the heart of crypto innovation, with the most active builder community in crypto. Open to all Ethereum mainnet builders, this program is designed to meet that energy - making best-in-class security more accessible than ever. Learn more about the $1M initiative and how to get involved below… 🧵

    276453230105K viewsView on X
  • Jan 23, 202657x their median

    Security update: We’ve patched a critical bug in our Jellyfish cryptographic library that could allow incorrect ZKP comparison results Downstream users: upgrade ASAP to jf-relation-v0.5.0 This bug did not affect Espresso-integrated chains h/t @LeastAuthority for disclosing

    1391317215K viewsView on X
  • Nov 19, 202513x their median

    Our team recently completed a security audit of Zebra's NU6.1 Network Upgrade for @ZcashFoundation. You can read the full report, including our findings, here: https://t.co/9ynP1VGLUA https://t.co/6msmeXlj3k

    306213.1K viewsView on X
  • Apr 2, 202611x their median

    The MoonMath Manual Study Group is back, hosted by @__zkhack__ . A great way to go from intuition to deeper understanding with others. Join here: https://t.co/1jbiSy26GC https://t.co/uwkM8fnLf1

    246111.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20268.7x their median

    Our team recently completed a security audit of @SeraiDEX distributed key generation (DKG) for @MagicGrants. You can read the full report, including our findings, here: https://t.co/WXd5WxG3wt

    186112.3K viewsView on X
  • Dec 4, 20257.3x their median

    Introducing: Phreeli, the first wireless service built entirely around #privacy by design. 📱 “Consumers deserve a wireless service that respects their privacy,” said @nickcalyx, CEO and founder of Phreeli. Learn more about the next gen of privacy. ➡️ https://t.co/NzGnn53Rcp https://t.co/pcsFB0pyO7

    144221.3K viewsView on X
  • Oct 30, 20256.0x their median

    We use zero-knowledge proofs, zkEVMs, MPC, and formal verification to strengthen privacy-first systems. Our new Cryptographic Expertise page is live: https://t.co/wVbJ8uHnzI

    162003.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20265.7x their median

    The report from our security audit of ZK Prover for @tfh_technology is now public. You can read the full report, including our findings, here: https://t.co/CYT00HrXuc

    133014.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 166K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Posts are seen about 830 times each, and 0.361% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.499% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.8K interactions, about 922x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Least Authority's engagement rate on X?
Least Authority (@LeastAuthority) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 3 original posts from the last 30 days against 166,419 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, Least Authority sits below the 10th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LeastAuthority have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @LeastAuthority post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going