Back to @LarryTaunton's profile

Larry Alex Taunton engagement report

@LarryTaunton - 237K followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.591%
of 237K followers
Per impression
9.23%
15K views on a typical post
Reach
6.40%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.4K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.153%
23 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.3/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 237K followers, an engagement rate of 0.591%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 9.23% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 130K interactions, about 94x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Larry Alex Taunton's engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 96% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.591%, Larry Alex Taunton sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,186 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.147% to 0.698%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,186 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,400 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video77% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 77% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 808 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Mar 17, 202594x their median

    1/5 I was SWATed last night as you can see in these 3 videos. I was in bed, but noticed Ranger, my German shepherd, was on the prowl, his ears up. I heed his instincts. I then saw a flicker of light on my BR door. Ranger went to investigate, I got my gun….. https://t.co/B6MIKHC3V8

    108K17K3.9K1.6K37M viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 202630x their median

    Christians will not hijack planes in the name of Jesus. Jews will not blow themselves up in the name of Moses. Mormons will not behead you for leaving the faith. But there is one religion that absolutely DOES do these things on a daily basis. Can you guess which one?

    33K6.3K1.9K278711K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 202612x their median

    🚨BREAKING: A man has just reportedly stabbed a young girl, an elderly woman, and 3 others in random attack in centre of Amsterdam This isn’t normal. This never use to happen. FOLLOW @America_1777 https://t.co/DLNOH8MLui

    12K4.1K347134381K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20267.0x their median

    Illegals: A Warning to Americans: Since ~2019, I have tracked caravans of illegals from So America to the US. I interviewed them, followed them into cartel towns and jungles, and observed all that they were willing to do — sell themselves, go without food, steal, risk every kind of danger, make Faustian bargains, etc. — to get to the US. Always I had this feeling, a memory, really, from my years of studying history, that I couldn’t put my finger on, but it was trying to penetrate my conscious being. Then it came to me: They are tougher than Americans. Writing on the fall of Athens, historian Will Durant said, “Nations are born stoic and die epicurean.” That is, nations are born amidst struggle and hardship and collapse as seekers of pleasure. I said I had a memory of sorts that was trying to find expression, and it ran along much the same lines as Durant’s observation. I remembered that Rome collapsed, not in a day, but over the course of centuries that accelerated into decades, as wave upon wave of uncivilized Germanic tribesmen, “illegals” so to speak, poured across the empire’s northern frontier and eventually sacked Rome itself. Rome had been built on strong, large families; unity of purpose; and the hard work of its people. Its armies were, at its height, citizen armies. Men fought to preserve what they knew and loved. Near its end, Romans were a lazy, self-indulgent people who paid others to do their fighting. Infanticide, which was common throughout Rome’s history, became a capital offense and a woman who aborted her child, also common, could be executed or exiled. This wasn’t due to any moral considerations, a recognition of the personhood of an unborn child, or anything like that at all. It was a much too late recognition that with the dramatic decline in the size of Roman families as prosperity increased, came a decrease in tax revenues and an over-reliance on foreigners to fill the ranks of the army — all of which would prove disastrous for Rome. Sound familiar? All of this was somewhere in the back of my mind, a feeling at first, as I observed the third worlders making their way by the millions to our borders. I saw them in the violence of Africa, the intrigues of the Middle East, and everywhere there is misery south of our border. Generally speaking, they are a people inured to suffering (theirs or that of others), are accustomed to death, unaccustomed to the comforts Americans take for granted, have lived in nothing but squalor, do not share your views of private property or civil discourse, view violence as a part of daily life, lack even the most basic education, and have little sympathy for the low pain threshold of Americans. These are the people coming to take your inheritance from you. Coming from a “might makes right” world, they know no other policy. They have no vested interest in preserving American law or culture, and that is because it isn’t their heritage and they don’t understand it. Democrats seem to think they will be immune from all of this because they foolishly believe these newcomers will view them as benefactors. They do not. I’ve met them, been in their cardboard camps, walk with them on trails, heard their hopes and dreams, and in none of it is there such nuanced thinking. America is, for them, a ripe fruit theirs for the taking. Once you open the castle gates and lower the drawbridge, you no longer control the outcome. Indeed, you have surrendered it. And why are Democrats willing to do that? Because they hate Americans more than this still ill-defined rabble, and they don’t understand what’s coming. These people are tougher than you, and they don’t give a damn about you. Be careful how you vote. The future you hope for will be, I promise, very different from the rosy one media promises you. I’m speaking from firsthand experience.

    6.2K2.8K350326164K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20266.0x their median

    Back in our favorite state❤️ https://t.co/qNcX7xKax7

    7.8K19230634117K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20262.1x their median

    Today we’re quoted in @thetimes as it’s revealed: -surrogacy for male couples has surged 191% since 2015 -most single men who pursue surrogacy are over 40 -some of the single men are in 60s/70s -most British surrogate babies now born abroad Ban it now @DHSCgovuk https://t.co/O2um5cSFpN

    2.0K789496364K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20261.5x their median

    Muslims should be banned from piloting planes carrying anything but other Muslims.

    1.9K15179614K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 2026

    Convo with County Tax Assessor’s Office: “Mr. Taunton?” “Yes, ma’am.” “Sweetheart, you filled out this tax form wrong. You’ll pay too much tax.” “What did I do wrong?” “You said you don’t have livestock.” “I don’t. I don’t have any cattle.” “You’ve got horses, don’t you?” “I do.” “Well, Darlin,’ those count. I’m going to send this form to you again. Fill it out right this time. Any acreage with livestock, which is all of yours, will cut your taxes by half.” “Yes, ma’am.” Only in the South.

    1.3K7929215K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026

    UN committee says countries must consider reparations for slave trade https://t.co/tXIsU9FrMS

    561665146143K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 2026

    Abortion. Collapsing birth rates. A fertility industry turning human life into a commodity. Are these separate issues or symptoms of something much bigger? Seth Gruber joins me to make the case that the West isn’t simply losing population. It’s losing its understanding of what human life is worth.

    2557613821K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 237K followers, an engagement rate of 0.591%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 9.23% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 130K interactions, about 94x its own typical post.

What is Larry Alex Taunton's engagement rate on X?
Larry Alex Taunton (@LarryTaunton) has an engagement rate of 0.591%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 236,566 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.591%, Larry Alex Taunton sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,186 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LarryTaunton have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LarryTaunton post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going