Back to @LangmanVince's profile

Vince Langman engagement report

@LangmanVince - 576K followers on X

Measured over 62 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.06%
of 576K followers
Per impression
3.17%
11K views on a typical post
Reach
1.88%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
342
interactions (median)
Saved
0.042%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.37/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 342 interactions against 576K followers, an engagement rate of 0.06%. Measured over 62 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 3.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.87% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 62 posts sampled, 84% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 130K interactions, about 379x its own typical post.

Measured over 62 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Vince Langman's engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 79% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.06%, Vince Langman sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,570 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.699%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,570 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,410 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.699%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video84% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link13% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 84% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 158 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 3, 2026379x their median

    🚨SEE YOU IN COURT!!! Just filed a federal complaint. I’m taking legal action over my ejection from the @chicagosky game while peacefully exercising my First Amendment rights. My T-shirt did what the whole @WNBA apparently couldn’t: define a woman. No threats. No violence. Just biology. And somehow, that required a security escort. You don’t have to agree with my speech but you don’t get to silence me for it. I will not be intimidated. I will not be silenced. I will continue to stand for women and defend free speech.

    108K16K4.5K1.2K2.9M viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026365x their median

    I have officially withdrawn from the Ed Sheeran tour

    110K8.0K6.0K3512.4M viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 2026323x their median

    Today is National Coming Out Day. https://t.co/dcuB8iKsDu

    83K11K2.0K14K6.8M viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026209x their median

    Hayley Williams says “Fuck ICE” and “Free Palestine” at her show last night in Gilford, NH 🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸 (Video: tim_music13 / Instagram) https://t.co/z4Uyqj3WMx

    61K8.7K1.3K5371.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026200x their median

    🚨 BREAKING: The FBI has ARRESTED Democrat Massachusetts State Rep. Francisco Paulino for PANDEMIC FRAUD Paulino faces SEVERAL DECADES in prison. DOJ alleges the disgraced Rep. scammed taxpayers out $700,000 in pandemic relief funds for personal use, using it real estate expenses, loan payments, and transfers to his campaign account To make matters worse, Paulino also LOANED OUT taxpayer dollars at a SIGNIFICANTLY higher interest rate than he was paying, just to line his own pockets. He faces an 11-count indictment: eight counts of wire fraud (or aiding and abetting wire fraud) and three counts of unlawful monetary transactions/money laundering

    53K14K1.7K4961.2M viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 2026163x their median

    🚨 BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Ohio mental hospital CONFIRMS James Talarico was discharged from the facility earlier this week The “flu” thing was a BIG FAT LIE Following reporting by @SaraGonzalesTX and @CarolineWren, a hospital employee told @RheinAmacher and I that Talarico had in fact been a patient at the Lindner Center of Hope near Cincinnati, Ohio, which specializes in around-the-clock mental health treatment. While I sympathize with those dealing with mental health crises, this man is CLEARLY not suited to become a US Senator representing over 30 MILLION TEXANS. The job doesn’t get easier after being elected — it only gets MORE stressful. And Talarico clearly can’t handle it. I pray he gets the help he needs, but Texans need a real representative they can rely on.

    36K12K5.2K2.8K4.5M viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 2026110x their median

    Walked by the convicted felon-in-chief’s building and paid my respects. Vote blue. We need to take our country back from the toxic male patriarchy. Full stop. https://t.co/DyuBs47ECa

    2.2K23334K1.4K1.6M viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 202682x their median

    This will forever be Bernie Sanders's legacy! https://t.co/IaCmsVrpFD

    19K5.1K625201308K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 202663x their median

    🚨 HOLY CRAP! Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent just MIC DROPPED every critic of President Trump’s Russian diesel surge deal "The EUROPEANS have given the Russians more money since the start of this war than they have given the Ukrainians!” 🤯 “So for THEM to say that we cannot have a respite in diesel pricing is COMPLETELY HYPOCRITICAL." 🔥 Europe spent years funding Putin with energy purchases, and now they're lecturing America about one diesel deal…NOT GONNA FLY Iran tried to block the world from fuel, and President Trump went around them easily! Lower prices on the way. No apologies. Zelensky should step down. https://t.co/5SK3fddHaH

    16K5.0K338213281K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202663x their median

    Ground beef, $6.89 a pound. Thanks, MAGA.

    14K1.3K5.8K3022.6M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 342 interactions against 576K followers, an engagement rate of 0.06%. Measured over 62 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 3.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.87% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 62 posts sampled, 84% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 130K interactions, about 379x its own typical post.

What is Vince Langman's engagement rate on X?
Vince Langman (@LangmanVince) has an engagement rate of 0.06%, based on the median interactions across 62 original posts from the last 30 days against 576,202 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.06%, Vince Langman sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,570 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LangmanVince have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LangmanVince post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going