Back to @Kotaku's profile

Kotaku engagement report

@Kotaku - 2.4M followers on X

Measured over 603 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 2.4M followers
Per impression
0.135%
9.7K views on a typical post
Reach
0.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
13
interactions (median)
Saved
0.021%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
20.27/day
active 103% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 13 interactions against 2.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 603 original posts, its engagement rate beats 7% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.7K times each, and 0.135% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.403% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 20.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 603 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 1458x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #deals, #deal, #partnerscontent.

Measured over 603 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #deals, #deal, #partnerscontent.

Compared with accounts its own size

Kotaku's engagement rate beats 7% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 9% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Kotaku sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,078 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.694%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,078 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,460 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.694%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video1% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 1% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 140 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 15, 20261458x their median

    Democratic Congress member Ritchie Torres is introducing legislation in Congress to regulate digital video game ownership. "A game that can be taken away the moment a company pulls the plug is not a purchase. It is a rental disguised as a sale." https://t.co/bcgECOmnR2

    17K2.6K246364365K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 2026496x their median

    Northernlion Addresses His Friend's U.S. Army–Sponsored Twitch Streams: "It's So Far Beyond The Bounds Of What Is Acceptable To Me" https://t.co/5beO03qNdV

    6.6K166431071.5M viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 2026487x their median

    I Don't Want To Play Your AI-Generated Mod That Puts Skate 3 Inside Of Modern Warfare 2 Inside Of Minecraft: https://t.co/mO5YtsmtfU

    5.7K87516075113K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 2026479x their median

    Gears of War: E-Day Story Director Laid Off Just Four Days After Celebrating The Game Going Gold https://t.co/9kxClpd6tN

    5.7K572176287770K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026338x their median

    Well this sucks https://t.co/NmK1BL6mE0

    3.1K781.3K2501.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026253x their median

    Double Fine now officially owns all of its games made under Xbox and their publishing rights. https://t.co/sCja5TMyc2

    3.1K369435474K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026244x their median

    Bit Reactor stopped paying up to 80 percent of the studio's staff ahead of Star Wars Zero Company's launch after money reportedly ran out. "It is sick and weird to have all of these EA and Disney folks as well as Bit Reactor Senior staff making all of these 10/10 posts about Star Wars Zero Company being such a huge success and praising the work of the team while seemingly concealing the fact that the team was furloughed weeks ago," a developer who left the studio back in May wrote online this week. https://t.co/vvrtQ3cCNo

    2.9K3883357191K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 2026153x their median

    The critics got this one dead wrong: Tom Cruise' Digger is 100% "certified fresh" https://t.co/pJ7wBZusPy

    2.0K98301361K viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 2026150x their median

    The One Thing EA Has Always Been Good At Is Killing Video Game Studios https://t.co/r83oVrePF6

    1.7K358572036K viewsView on X
  • Oct 22, 2026148x their median

    A source tells Kotaku that Gears of War: E-Day cost over $500 million to make. Sales estimates have been weak despite earning the highest Metacritic score since the original trilogy. If it was never going to recoup its expenses, maybe it could achieve more as an Xbox console exclusive https://t.co/2FLyN66o2Y

    1.2K142424309550K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#deals#deal#partnerscontent#partners#savemasseffect

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 13 interactions against 2.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 603 original posts, its engagement rate beats 7% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.7K times each, and 0.135% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.403% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 20.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 603 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 1458x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #deals, #deal, #partnerscontent.

What is Kotaku's engagement rate on X?
Kotaku (@Kotaku) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 603 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,397,807 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Kotaku sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,078 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Kotaku have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 7% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Kotaku post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 20.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going