Back to @KelemenCari's profile

Cari Kelemen engagement report

@KelemenCari - 192K followers on X

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.105%
of 192K followers
Per impression
8.41%
2.4K views on a typical post
Reach
1.25%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
202
interactions (median)
Saved
0.042%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.03/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 202 interactions against 192K followers, an engagement rate of 0.105%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.4K times each, and 8.41% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 23% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 30K interactions, about 147x its own typical post.

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Cari Kelemen's engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 95% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.105%, Cari Kelemen sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,004 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,390 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video23% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 23% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 258 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 14, 2026147x their median

    THIS IS GENIUS! Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick just announced plans to use the Postal Service to conduct the Census instead of wasting billions. USPS workers will also replace 20,000 Social Security workers. "We spend $40 billion every 10 years doing the census. And that means we hire 625,000 people. And they go, and they rent cars and gas, and you pay them food... They go to every household and count the people." "What department do we already have that already employs 625,000 people? It's got cars, already has gas, and goes to every household. [Answer: USPS]." "They can go to your house when you have a baby and give you the form for Social Security. And the 20,000 Social Security officers that we have, we just don't need them. We actually can do real customer service." "Let's use the assets of the government to make us better and save us money." IT'S SO GENIUS!

    24K4.8K938207445K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 2026100x their median

    The woman who taught America to cook was 6ft 2, used butter by the pound on public television for 40 years, and outlived most of the people who told her to stop. Julia Child was born in California in 1912. She could not cook until she was 36. Then her husband was posted to Paris, she ate a sole fried in butter in Rouen, and that was that. If you were in America in the 1960s, you remember her. Black and white, a voice like a trombone, dropping things and carrying on. She put a whole chicken on the board, rubbed it with butter, and told you to do the same. Cream went into the sauce. The fat stayed on the roast. Then the 1980s arrived and the country was ordered onto margarine, skimmed milk and chicken breast with the skin off. Cookery writers fell into line overnight. Julia would not. She said the fear of food was doing more harm than the food. She carried on with the butter, in front of the cameras, while the nutritionists wrote to the network. She was mocked for it as a relic. She worked into her 80s, lived on her own, and died in 2004, 2 days short of her 92nd birthday. The people who built the low fat pyramid have been quietly taking it apart ever since. This January the American government finally turned it upside down. She did not live to see herself proved right. She just went on cooking as if it had never been in doubt.

    17K2.6K344115255K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202695x their median

    JOE SCARBOROUGH SAYS HIS WIFE LOST HER BIRTH CERTIFICATE AND WILL NOT BE ABLE TO VOTE, BECAUSE THEY CANNOT FIND IT ANYWHERE. https://t.co/07BNekgh0h

    3.5K64014K1.0K501K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 202657x their median

    FACTS FIRST: Republican Party registration is sky high, and the battleground numbers aren’t event close. That’s why the Fake News continue to peddle fake polls because they know the data is very bad for Democrats. https://t.co/dvlSaa4bwT

    8.5K2.1K77997207K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 202625x their median

    BOOM! THAT WAS SUPER FAST! One day after the announcement, Russian diesel is already nearing the American coast. The MINERVA ZEN is carrying 280,000 barrels of fuel from a shipment loaded in St. Petersburg on September 22. The timing suggests Washington and Moscow may have reached an understanding weeks before Trump went public.

    3.8K1.1K122120374K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 202622x their median

    DFW hits 58 straight days without rain, tying the 3rd-longest dry streak on record https://t.co/4B9ZQgA7qD

    3.8K333153143178K viewsView on X
  • Jun 8, 202318x their median

    Dapper Trump with Letterman in 1987 😁 https://t.co/vipCWCNCKM

    2.4K1.1K101190610K viewsView on X
  • Apr 20, 202312x their median

    Homeschooling has exploded since 2020. If you are thinking about it, but you have questions or concerns, Consider Homeschooling can help. Go to https://t.co/qRCcZG9LIp and use the code FREESHIPUSA for free shipping in the USA. Ebook, PDF and audiobook also available. https://t.co/wAPY75jyfT

    1.5K70125846497K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20268.4x their median

    The Death Penalty means that we value innocent life so highly that if you take one—you will pay for it with your own.

    1.4K249571510K viewsView on X
  • May 11, 20246.4x their median

    👁️Linking - Nikola Tesla : OSS : Operation Gladio : John G. Trump : Elon Musk -- A THREAD Go with me on this working theory that I am slowly starting to put together... Nikola Tesla is not merely a tale of one man’s genius and inventions but a saga interwoven with clandestine operations, governmental intrigue, and the evolution of technology that mirrors his visionary ideas... Tesla’s mysterious death in January 1943, and the subsequent scrutiny over his work, has made me think of the potential involvement of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the precursor to the CIA, and the implications for modern technological advancements spearheaded by figures like Elon Musk... 1/7

    8663454336170K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 202 interactions against 192K followers, an engagement rate of 0.105%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.4K times each, and 8.41% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 23% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 30K interactions, about 147x its own typical post.

What is Cari Kelemen's engagement rate on X?
Cari Kelemen (@KelemenCari) has an engagement rate of 0.105%, based on the median interactions across 35 original posts from the last 30 days against 192,361 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.105%, Cari Kelemen sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @KelemenCari have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @KelemenCari post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going