Back to @JornalismoWando's profile

JornalismoWando engagement report

@JornalismoWando - 181K followers on X

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.693%
of 181K followers
Per impression
4.01%
31K views on a typical post
Reach
17.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.3K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.074%
23 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.67/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 181K followers, an engagement rate of 0.693%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 31K times each, and 4.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 40% carry an image or video, 20% are part of a thread and 40% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 28K interactions, about 22x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #direitaterrorista, #eleição2026, #g1.

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026. Recurring tags: #direitaterrorista, #eleição2026, #g1.

Compared with accounts its own size

JornalismoWando's engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 81% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.693%, JornalismoWando sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.147% to 0.698%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,098 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,393 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video40% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link40% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 40% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 40% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 222 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 17, 202622x their median

    A notícia de que FLAVIO BOLSONARO tem empresa NO MESMO ENDEREÇO do CARECA DO INSS foi completamente omitida pela grande mídia.

    23K4.2K32264250K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 202622x their median

    A Globo acaba de anunciar a demissão de Frederic Kachar, executivo exposto ontem pelo @sitetvpop em conversas com Daniel Vorcaro https://t.co/vUDrwGoDru

    23K3.4K522849668K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202613x their median

    Delata todo mundo menos eu, Dani. https://t.co/CBAYjVxo3g

    15K1.6K663988K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20264.4x their median

    "Ela ficou com o Kassio": conversa de Vorcaro cita cobrança de R$ 10 mil por encontro Interlocutora diz que “as meninas estão prontas” e, dias depois, afirma que uma amiga “ficou com o kassio” e cobra 10 mil por encontro https://t.co/G8fsduRDzG

    4.1K1.1K199153204K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20263.7x their median

    André Mendonça está conseguindo afastar o caso Dark Horse da campanha eleitoral.

    4.0K4031211660K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 20263.3x their median

    Por que a Globo ainda não anunciou a demissão do Fred Kachar? Estão com medo dele jogar merda no ventilador? A sua demissão passará por uma negociação dura e cara. O silêncio dele agora vale ouro.

    3.4K587611525K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20262.9x their median

    Quase todas as análises sobre a treta no STF não levam em conta que André Mendonça representa o grupo político que há 3 anos tentou um golpe de estado no país. É o mesmo grupo que hoje articula, em conluio com os EUA, uma nova tentativa de golpe caso perca a eleição. O triunfo de André Mendonça será o triunfo do golpismo.

    3.0K587871932K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20262.4x their median

    Em público, o deputado Nikolas Ferreira acusava o PT de estar envolvido com Vorcaro. Mas, no escurinho do zap, Nikolas chamava o banqueiro de “Dani”, ‘lindão’ e pedia liberação de ativo de minério https://t.co/jTnT8Vzy9f

    2.5K534321123K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20262.2x their median

    A maioria das análises sobre o dia de ontem coloca apenas Flávio Dino e Alexandre de Moraes na mira. Já o golpista André Mendonça está passando ileso, mesmo depois das suas relações com Vorcaro e Cezinha de Madureira terem vindo à tona. Faltando pouco mais de duas semanas para a eleição, a narrativa golpista do bolsonarismo está sendo turbinada pela complacência de parte relevante da grande mídia.

    2.2K3711881338K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20262.2x their median

    Sancho Pancer omite que a jornalista é CEO do Metrópoles e que há mensagens mostrando que o banco Master efetuou pagamento ao site. Violação do sigilo da jornalista é uma ova! https://t.co/ox0SXzcKML

    2.4K28831831K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#direitaterrorista#eleição2026#g1#opiniao

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 181K followers, an engagement rate of 0.693%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 31K times each, and 4.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 40% carry an image or video, 20% are part of a thread and 40% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 28K interactions, about 22x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #direitaterrorista, #eleição2026, #g1.

What is JornalismoWando's engagement rate on X?
JornalismoWando (@JornalismoWando) has an engagement rate of 0.693%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 180,675 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.693%, JornalismoWando sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @JornalismoWando have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @JornalismoWando post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going