Back to @JackCarrUSA's profile

Jack Carr engagement report

@JackCarrUSA - 275K followers on X

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.388%
of 275K followers
Per impression
7.01%
15K views on a typical post
Reach
5.54%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.112%
17 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.3/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 275K followers, an engagement rate of 0.388%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 7.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.53% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.3K interactions, about 5.0x its own typical post.

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Jack Carr's engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 93% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.388%, Jack Carr sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.147% to 0.698%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,004 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,390 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link22% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 22% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 285 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 15, 20265.0x their median

    Are you ready for more James Reece? THE TERMINAL LIST Season 2 based on TRUE BELIEVER is coming in hot on October 21. Let’s go! https://t.co/4f7hyzn36p

    4.9K2871332788K viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 20264.5x their median

    Thank you to everyone who made THE TERMINAL LIST Season 2 the #1 show on Prime Video less than 24 hours after its release 🙏 If you’ve seen it, what did you think? If not, do your weekend plans include a binge? Will SAVAGE SON be next…? https://t.co/h3tNdL75Qk

    4.0K3274314665K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20264.2x their median

    Chris Pratt is back as James Reece in THE TERMINAL LIST SEASON 2 based on TRUE BELIEVER coming to Prime Video October 21. “Somewhere, a True Believer is training to kill you.” https://t.co/9C4wJQNQ6D

    4.1K2508731420K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20263.7x their median

    It is an honor to have known and to have served with these men. Repost from @NavySEALMuseum On September 12, 2012, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty, who previously served as Navy SEALs, were killed in Benghazi, Libya when an American diplomatic compound was attacked. (U.S. Ambassador to Libya J. Christopher Stevens and U.S. Foreign Service Information Management Officer Sean Smith also perished in the attack on September 11; ten others were severely wounded.) Ty Woods was working as a contractor for the CIA; he responded to the initial attack. Glen Doherty, also a CIA contractor and friend of Woods, was positioned in Tripoli. Upon hearing of the attack, Doherty flew to Benghazi to provide support. These men–among a handful of others–courageously defended the compound against all odds. Ty Woods and Glen Doherty died on a rooftop while covering each other under fire. Their actions exemplify the SEAL Ethos of upholding courage, character, loyalty, and brotherhood. This painting, titled “Benghazi, No Man Left Behind”, was commissioned by C.L. Foley and donated to the Navy SEAL Museum. The artist is Josh T. Hermann, who also served as a Navy SEAL.

    3.4K453701435K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20263.2x their median

    Thank you to everyone who made DARK WOLF - the Ben Edwards prequel origin story starring Taylor Kitsch - #1 on Prime Video in its first week last year, and thank you to everyone discovering it now or rewatching it in preparation for THE TERMINAL LIST Season 2 coming to Prime Video on October 21. Lets go!

    3.1K1769217102K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 20263.0x their median

    Get ready to BINGE! All eight episodes drop tomorrow, October 21. https://t.co/Z3cGmVXPoO

    2.8K2691173492K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20262.4x their median

    THE TERMINAL LIST Season 2 based on TRUE BELIEVER hits Prime Video on October 21. “Somewhere a True Believer is training to kill you.” https://t.co/wkGkJp5MSK

    2.3K183901895K viewsView on X
  • Oct 22, 20262.3x their median

    THE TERMINAL LIST Season 2 is the #1 show on Prime Video. Thank you to everyone who jumped back into the fight with James Reece on his journey of violent redemption. Humbled and grateful 🙏 https://t.co/M95sniFP3Q

    2.1K1831512027K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20262.3x their median

    Every August I find myself reflecting on the withdrawal from Afghanistan and the close to twenty years that preceded it. My thoughts on what amounts to almost zero accountability for senior level military officers, elected representatives, and appointed bureaucrats who failed upward during that time are captured in a blog I wrote on 16 August 2021 titled “Imperial Hubris: The Great Game Revisited” and an article I wrote for TownHall on 23 August 2021 titled “A Time For Bold Adjustment: Fire The Generals.” Both can be found on the blog section of my website. https://t.co/5I3wAyADXs

From the blog: I describe the American experience in Afghanistan as “…a failure that crossed party lines over four separate administrations, two Republican and two Democrat. As we watch the U.S. Embassy evacuation in Kabul and see images of the Taliban taking control of the country, to those of us who fought there it is more than a strategic failure; it’s personal.” “This year, for the first time in U.S. history, one could have joined the military, served for twenty years, and retired while the country is still involved in the same war.” “In what is accurately described as imperial hubris, the United States political-military establishment confused entry and initial resolve with victory. They were wrong; America’s sons and daughters paid the price.” “Simply put, our elected officials and senior level military leaders were trapped by their own intellectual inertia, condemning us to eventual defeat.”   “Strategically, our leaders were not held to account for their blunders — in too many cases, blunders of epic proportions. Rather, they were promoted and eventually retired with full pensions to sit on the boards of companies making a killing in the world of government contracts; the military industrial complex is alive and well. As Lt. Col. Paul Yingling pointed out in his 2007 article A Failure in Generalship, ‘As matters stand now, a private who loses a rifle suffers far greater consequences than a general who loses a war.’”

    2.1K229531238K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20262.2x their median

    Who remembers? AMERICAN NINJA starring Michael Dudikoff hit screens on this day in 1985 🇺🇸🥷 https://t.co/tvlN75UQSu

    2.0K1221512858K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 275K followers, an engagement rate of 0.388%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 7.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.53% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.3K interactions, about 5.0x its own typical post.

What is Jack Carr's engagement rate on X?
Jack Carr (@JackCarrUSA) has an engagement rate of 0.388%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 274,916 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.388%, Jack Carr sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @JackCarrUSA have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @JackCarrUSA post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going