Back to @JRodgers11's profile

Jordan Rodgers engagement report

@JRodgers11 - 160K followers on X

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
2.48%
of 160K followers
Per impression
1.98%
201K views on a typical post
Reach
125.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.047%
94 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.23/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Sunday

Early reading. We have captured 3 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 4.0K interactions against 160K followers, an engagement rate of 2.48%. Posts are seen about 201K times each, and 1.98% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 125.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.23 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 29K interactions, about 7.4x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 2.48%, Jordan Rodgers sits above the 75th percentile of the 213,674 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.699% to 2.61%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.699%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,674 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,407 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.699%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video33% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 33% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 217 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 12, 20257.4x their median

    Breaking: Tennessee is moving on from starting quarterback Nico Iamaleava. Tennessee coach Josh Heupel informed the team of the decision at a team meeting. Iamaleava missed meetings and practice on Friday, which was the driver of this decision, sources told @PeteThamel. https://t.co/onxbkJKNJV

    24K1.4K1.8K2.6K7.9M viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20255.0x their median

    New hat just dropped! https://t.co/FX0HRzJHhS

    19K8051251452.0M viewsView on X
  • Apr 12, 20252.3x their median

    Nico Iamaleava is right to fight for every single penny he feels he deserves, & the University of Tennessee has every right to decide he isn’t worth it. The problem is that former NCAA president Mark Emmert had a chance to protect them both from being in this position. The NCAA’s failure to do the one thing it was created to do shows why leadership matters. The NCAAs refusal to be on the right side of history has us looking at the present like “What the F*ck?”. So, who’s to tell Nico he doesn’t deserve $4 million, & who’s to say someone hasn’t already said they got it for him. So, don’t be mad at Nico or Tenn. Place the blame where it belongs… Squarely on the greedy shoulders of the NCAA. @ThePivot #PivotalMoments #PivotalConversations #PivotalThoughts

    7.0K7671.1K2442.2M viewsView on X
  • Dec 21, 2024170x their median

    So you’re telling me two teams with a combined 0-3 record vs Top 25 are showing us all they aren’t playoff caliber… I’m shocked. Stop looking at the number in the loss column and start looking at WHO they played and WHO they beat!! 12 team playoff is great, we just didn’t get the best 12 teams.

    7.0K718982169971K viewsView on X
  • Jan 9, 20261.7x their median

    On his last TD throw, Trinidad Chambliss identified the incoming blitz by Keionte Scott, nods his head, and motions with his fingers to bring it. Awesome chess match. https://t.co/m03YUhV79n

    6.3K21546581.1M viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 2026

    We are 21 starts into Arch Manning's career. I don't think I've seen him make a single protection adjustment or check at the line of scrimmage. And if he doesn't have the autonomy to do so... it means he lacks the ability to do so at this point.

    4.5K1668433511K viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 2026

    Miami/FSU 1) Terrible holding call 2) Miami defender is still grasping for the ball with his left hand over the top of the FSU WRs hands. That was an FSU TD. FSU got hosed. Also…that was PI at the end of ND/BYU. Have to throw a flag there. Refs affecting way too many game changing plays tonight.

    3.2K45024347201K viewsView on X
  • Apr 23, 2026

    Masterclass by @danorlovsky7 “If im not right, the system is wrong.” Bullet proof clip. https://t.co/Pd48ip0SK4

    3.1K706310545K viewsView on X
  • Nov 13, 202458x their median

    Take notes, folks ✍️ @rhettlashlee on the depth of the ACC. https://t.co/xdXPD9TnJa

    2.3K470123153261K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 2025

    "The hype doesn't match the tape." —@JRodgers11 on Arch Manning https://t.co/NZJoNAaHAD

    1.9K179245238695K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4.0K interactions against 160K followers, an engagement rate of 2.48%. Posts are seen about 201K times each, and 1.98% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 125.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.23 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 29K interactions, about 7.4x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Jordan Rodgers's engagement rate on X?
Jordan Rodgers (@JRodgers11) has an engagement rate of 2.48%, based on the median interactions across 3 original posts from the last 30 days against 160,468 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 2.48%, Jordan Rodgers sits above the 75th percentile of the 213,674 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @JRodgers11 have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @JRodgers11 post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going