José Luis Sánchez 🇪🇸 engagement report
@JLSanchez78 - 380K followers on X
Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 3.9K interactions against 380K followers, an engagement rate of 1.02%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 134K times each, and 2.91% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 35.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 6.1x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #artículo14, #exclusiva, #laligaendazn.
Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #artículo14, #exclusiva, #laligaendazn.
Compared with accounts its own size
José Luis Sánchez 🇪🇸's engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 77% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 1.02%, José Luis Sánchez 🇪🇸 sits above the 75th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.698% to 2.61%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.147% |
| 75th percentile | 0.698% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.8% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 55% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 18% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 55% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 18% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 178 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 31, 20266.1x their median
📋✅ ¡Nuestros convocados! 🆚 @acffiorentina https://t.co/kCfHeDoect
- Aug 3, 20263.3x their median
Comunicado Oficial: Palacios.
- Sep 4, 20261.6x their median
📖 El REGLAMENTO es claro FIFA y UEFA lo tiene claro. El arbitraje en España es diferente. Y así va. https://t.co/41Fcixkv3z
- Aug 4, 2026
💣💣💣💣💣 Moncloa apagó el 'caso Negreira' mientras se negociaba el gobierno de Cataluña via @TheObjective_es https://t.co/ptu8pff3pJ
- Sep 20, 2026
Tras la expulsión de Huijsen en el derbi de hoy, el RM (128-128) tiene un saldo de expulsiones en Liga igual a 0 en lo que llevamos de s. XXI (2001-2026). El ATM (133-134) tiene un saldo de expulsiones igual a +1. El FCB (103-172) tiene un saldo de expulsiones igual a +69.
- Sep 20, 2026
🌍 Menos mal que lo ve el mundo entero 🟨 Había sido Amarilla para Bellingham 📺 Revisa el VAR: amarilla para Romero 🟥 Roja clarísima. Esto es LaLiga https://t.co/aEi6mPY02A
- Sep 29, 2026
La Premier League ha encontrado culpable al Manchester City por simular contratos, inflar artificialmente acuerdos comerciales y vulnerar sus reglas de fair play financiero para tener más ingresos y más capacidad económica en sus fichajes. ¿Se os ocurre algo así en España?
- Oct 1, 20251.6x their median
Interior reduce de forma súbita al mínimo la presencia de los antidisturbios en Ceuta y Melilla https://t.co/2htiqOmGRC
- Sep 20, 2026
🟥 Roja perdonada a Kang In Entrada durisima a Valverde Ortiz Arias y el VAR condicionando claramente el partido. El Atlético tendría que jugar con 9 jugadores. https://t.co/XWvWqOujSa
- Sep 29, 2026
#Marca "Escándalo en Turquía: detienen al presidente del CTA" "... han sido arrestadas otras seis personas, todas ellas vinculadas al estamento arbitral y a la organización de los árbitros en el país" "Las denuncias apuntan a la descalificación de árbitros sin una decisión objetiva y razonada, a la falta de designaciones para determinados colegiados y a un supuesto trato de favor hacia otros" https://t.co/EDwYewZQok
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 3.9K interactions against 380K followers, an engagement rate of 1.02%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 134K times each, and 2.91% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 35.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 6.1x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #artículo14, #exclusiva, #laligaendazn.
- What is José Luis Sánchez 🇪🇸's engagement rate on X?
- José Luis Sánchez 🇪🇸 (@JLSanchez78) has an engagement rate of 1.02%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 379,605 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 1.02%, José Luis Sánchez 🇪🇸 sits above the 75th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @JLSanchez78 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @JLSanchez78 post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.