Ivar Arpi engagement report
@Ivarpi - 161K followers on X
Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 60 interactions against 161K followers, an engagement rate of 0.037%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 37% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.536% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.99% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 6% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.8K interactions, about 46x its own typical post.
Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Ivar Arpi's engagement rate beats 37% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 26% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.037%, Ivar Arpi sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,078 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.694% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 83.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 6% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 75% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 6% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 75% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 245 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 4, 202646x their median
En skandal att våldtäkterna mot äldre kvinnor inte är en större fråga. Orsaken? Förmodligen för att gärningsmännen är av ”fel” sort. Läs detta av @susbirgersson! https://t.co/zFWDlKlqJh
- Aug 21, 202624x their median
Läs @moreno_federico om hur Socialdemokraterna i Rosengård har förkryssade valsedlar, organiserad röstmobilisering och metoder som väcker frågor om partiets syn på valpåverkan. https://t.co/iKUcPgJ0s7
- Sep 30, 202622x their median
Insåg just att Centerpartiet har vidareutvecklat Reinfeldts linje från 2013. Då skulle ett av åtta riksdagspartier inte få vara med. Nu är det två. Fortsätter idéutvecklingen i den här takten kommer Centerpartiet till slut bara att kunna samarbeta med sig självt.
- Sep 23, 202621x their median
Håller med Bilan Osman och Rashid Musa: Det är rasism att Mohamed Abdukardir Ali (V) granskas. Varför granskas aldrig vita politiker?
- Aug 30, 202618x their median
När en politiker börjar med ”som liberal” vet man att ett problem snart ska förklaras olösligt. Elisabeth Thand Ringqvists (C) försvar av rätten att bära burka blottar en större fråga: hur blev det liberalt att skydda denna reaktionära kvinnosyn? https://t.co/yyKjFiaTHh
- Sep 30, 202616x their median
1/3 Leila Ali Elmi (MP) uppmanade somalier att rösta på somalier: ”Jag hoppas att vi alla somalier stöttar varandra och röstar på oss som kandiderar.” I ETC riktas granskningen ändå mot kritikernas fördomar. Kandidatens eget argument slipper kritiska frågor.
- Sep 15, 202616x their median
Vänsterpartister avslöjas med judehat och Hamashyllningar. Ändå rusar partiet i förorten. I dagens Under all kritik pratar vi om vänsterns nya väljare. Men den verkligt obehagliga frågan är kanske inte vad partiets företrädare har sagt. https://t.co/sTJ9G3kLFp
- Sep 16, 202614x their median
Avgjordes valet av invandringen? Frågan har mest besvarats med indignation. Men valdeltagandet och röstmönstren i valdistrikten går att räkna på – liksom de nya medborgare som tillkommit sedan 2022. När siffrorna läggs ihop ser man vad som avgjorde valet. https://t.co/cLrg54LnuH
- Sep 29, 202614x their median
"Det är för mycket fokus på regeringsfrågan", påstods det. Var det verkligen det? Sossarna tycks inte ha gjort något för att samla sitt regeringsunderlag innan valet. De bara räknade kallt med att V skulle lägga sig platt. Räknar fortfarande med det. Det är hela planen. https://t.co/QDeJOoAGqk
- Sep 17, 202613x their median
Gav invandringen vänstern valsegern? Det räcker inte att bara räkna de nya medborgarna. Jag har granskat tusentals valdistrikt. I 470 invandrartäta distrikt framträder en förändring som väger tyngre än det ökade valdeltagandet. https://t.co/cLrg54LnuH
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 60 interactions against 161K followers, an engagement rate of 0.037%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 37% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.536% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.99% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 6% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.8K interactions, about 46x its own typical post.
- What is Ivar Arpi's engagement rate on X?
- Ivar Arpi (@Ivarpi) has an engagement rate of 0.037%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 161,495 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.037%, Ivar Arpi sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,078 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Ivarpi have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 37% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Ivarpi post?
- Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.93 posts per day across the measured window.