Iván Cepeda Castro engagement report
@IvanCepedaCast - 2.1M followers on X
Measured over 84 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 3.8K interactions against 2.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.186%. Measured over 84 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 64K times each, and 5.97% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.11% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 84 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video and 24% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 52K interactions, about 14x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #política, #abelardodelaespriella, #boralula.
Measured over 84 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #política, #abelardodelaespriella, #boralula.
Compared with accounts its own size
Iván Cepeda Castro's engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 92% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.186%, Iván Cepeda Castro sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.696%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.696% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.9% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 55% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 24% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 55% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 24% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 424 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jun 30, 202614x their median
ANUNCIO DE DESOBEDIENCIA CIVIL https://t.co/d3NDZFGa6H
- Sep 3, 202611x their median
EXHIBICIÓN DE CADÁVERES Se pasea entre las bolsas con los cadáveres. Casi los pisa con desprecio. Se dice cristiano, pero en realidad es un ser sin escrúpulos y sin el más mínimo sentido de humanidad. https://t.co/EwzHtdrqTk
- Oct 24, 20269.8x their median
Todo mi apoyo, afecto y admiración para Lula: #BoraLula https://t.co/iKAf7sUmL1
- Sep 15, 20269.3x their median
“Milagro”, “Patria”, “Firmeza”, “Libro de la verdad”, “Presupuesto de la verdad”… Dime de qué presumes y te diré de qué careces.
- Sep 25, 20268.1x their median
VERGÜENZA PARA COLOMBIA Hoy en Naciones Unidas una nueva vergüenza para Colombia. Los inescrupulosos representantes del gobierno de Abelardo de la Espriella rindiendo pleitesía al genocida Netanyahu. Vergüenza y afrenta a nuestra dignidad como nación.
- Aug 22, 20267.2x their median
Miren con quién se pelean en las redes. El desmantelamiento de una de las muchas granjas de bots de @FerCerimedo_ok y @javiernegre10 bajo la tutela de @parscale desploma a los marketineros digitales de la basura multiplicada. Las figuras de la ultraderecha se han apoyado en las granjas de bots manejadas por IA impactando públicamente sin que los candidatos tengan trayectorias políticas sólidas, o bien, lavándoles la cara de su pasado criminal. La Internacional Reaccionaria se sostienen por el modelo evolucionado de #CambridgeAnalytica, sin eso SON NADA. @JMilei @KeikoFujimori @TitoAsfuraPHN @DanielNoboaOk @joseantoniokast @JuanOrlandoH @ABDELAESPRIELLA @jairbolsonaro representan la imposición neocolonial anglosionista @FerCerimedo_ok y @javiernegre10 son un par de ambiciosos sin escrúpulos que tripularon negocios políticos y de lavado de dinero para sus clientes, pero acumularon información que llevaron a la alcoba y hoy está siendo revelada. La tentativa de homicidio contra @nadia_beller perpetrada por sicarios a las órdenes de @FerCerimedo_ok (como apunta la mujer herida), demuestra hasta dónde ha llegado este socio de @laderechadiario @DerechaDiarioMX La contratación de los servicios de estos sujetos por @RicardoBSalinas cuyo alias es de todos conocido, viene a socavar las intenciones políticas de este personaje de la cúpula empresarial. La lucha en redes contra las granjas de bots en una tarea estúpida, se tiene que marcar un rumbo distinto frente a la guerra híbrida y la batalla cultural. Los antivalores que representa la internacional reaccionaria-anglosionista-neocolonial-tecnofascista han quedado al descubierto. Hay una reunión urgente en Estados Unidos para fabricar otro rostro digital con la misma estrategia de granjas de bots y algoritmos de IA. Solo tienen por ahora sus mantras contra gobiernos progresistas frente a las elecciones en #Brasil y #México, pero no tienen otra cosa que los sustente, son solo mantras. Al no poder establecer narrativas buscarán ensuciar los procesos electorales, pero están vencidos por ellos mismos y sus prácticas comerciales. La ultraderecha promueve la vida y tiene su agenda contra el aborto, Cerimedo habría pedido la ejecución de la madre de su hijo en plena gestación: “doble ejecución”. ¡Malditos hipócritas!
- Sep 28, 20266.6x their median
ESTAMOS CONTIGO, LULA El pueblo brasileño quiere a @LulaOficial. ¡Fuerza, Lula! https://t.co/LXDUQAEJwt
- Aug 20, 20266.6x their median
DE LA ESPRIELLA VIOLA LA CONSTITUCIÓN Y LA DEMOCRACIA https://t.co/RsRNUdht5b
- Aug 19, 20265.9x their median
Está noche a las 7 pm réplica del desde el gabinete de la Vida desde todos los canales de televisión. https://t.co/neb6hKi3nG
- Oct 7, 20265.3x their median
HASTA SIEMPRE, QUERIDO PIERO https://t.co/1Uw6dcu1Ms
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 3.8K interactions against 2.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.186%. Measured over 84 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 64K times each, and 5.97% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.11% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 84 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video and 24% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 52K interactions, about 14x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #política, #abelardodelaespriella, #boralula.
- What is Iván Cepeda Castro's engagement rate on X?
- Iván Cepeda Castro (@IvanCepedaCast) has an engagement rate of 0.186%, based on the median interactions across 84 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,056,579 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.186%, Iván Cepeda Castro sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @IvanCepedaCast have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @IvanCepedaCast post?
- Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.9 posts per day across the measured window.