Back to @Horcus's profile

Horcus engagement report

@Horcus - 248K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.23%
of 248K followers
Per impression
2.59%
105K views on a typical post
Reach
47.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.7K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.132%
139 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.73/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 2.7K interactions against 248K followers, an engagement rate of 1.23%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 105K times each, and 2.59% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 42.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 27K interactions, about 9.9x its own typical post.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026. Recurring tag: #valorant.

Compared with accounts its own size

Horcus's engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 70% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.23%, Horcus sits above the 75th percentile of the 212,078 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.694% to 2.61%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.694%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,078 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,460 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.694%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link5% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 151 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 10, 20269.9x their median

    TOP 1 CHAMBER #VALORANT https://t.co/3mrNupKTzh

    24K2.4K1144943.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 20269.4x their median

    Si España gana el Mundial sortearé 100€ entre todos los que den RT y LIKE a este tweet

    16K9.2K73060686K viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 20267.2x their median

    Los envidiosos dirán que es IA #LaVeladaDelAñoVI https://t.co/rp5j1O9qvj

    18K1.2K6762293K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20246.4x their median

    Top 1 Chamber 🤯 #VALORANT 钱包diff ❤️ https://t.co/dti7T8o52U

    15K1.5K3922011.6M viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20265.0x their median

    Chamber in China 🇨🇳 Shanghái #VALORANT https://t.co/Xxc9bN7nZF

    13K622109190370K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20264.4x their median

    He pasado por el peor año de mi vida. Lesiones importantes, problemas de salud y un golpe muy duro en mi vida personal. Todo parecía ponerse en contra, pero nunca me rendí. Y hoy por fin puedo anunciarlo: Vuelvo a los eventos internacionales y el primero ya está confirmado: nos vamos a Shanghái, China, para la final de #VALORANT Champions 🇨🇳 Y esto es solo el principio. Quiero viajar por todo el mundo y conoceros. Gracias por estar conmigo en los mejores momentos, pero sobre todo por haber estado en mi peor momento. Es ahí cuando más lo valoro. Os quiero muchísimo ❤️ Esto no es mi regreso. Es el comienzo del mayor prime de mi vida. VAMOS.

    11K41820344500K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20263.2x their median

    🎁 SORTEO x3 PACKS 'CHAMPIONS 2026' 🎁 Para participar: ✅ Repost + Like ✅ Follow @Horcus ✅ Mencionar a 2 amigos Acaba 28 septiembre ⏰ Para todo el mundo Los ganadores se dan en directo Twitch: Horcus #VALORANT https://t.co/58fH8I2Z0k

    4.1K2.6K2.0K2079K viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 20262.8x their median

    Michi Chamber 🐾 #VALORANT https://t.co/biBxEpA1uw

    7.1K5355228277K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20262.6x their median

    Han baneado a mi duo por defenderse de un weon que ha estado soltando burradas por chat y voz, además de trollear y throwear la partida, pero eh, que a ese tipo ni lo han baneado Ahora entiendo más aún cuando os defendéis y os cae el ban a vosotr@s GG #VALORANT 🥳🌈🥰💌

    6.6K21514022232K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20262.4x their median

    100% Real... #VALORANT https://t.co/iyfUkzKX7Z

    5.5K1.0K432186K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#valorant

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.7K interactions against 248K followers, an engagement rate of 1.23%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 105K times each, and 2.59% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 42.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 27K interactions, about 9.9x its own typical post.

What is Horcus's engagement rate on X?
Horcus (@Horcus) has an engagement rate of 1.23%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 248,255 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.23%, Horcus sits above the 75th percentile of the 212,078 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Horcus have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Horcus post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going