Dave Kennedy engagement report
@HackingDave - 234K followers on X
Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 106 interactions against 234K followers, an engagement rate of 0.045%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.0K times each, and 1.31% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 288x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #grrcon, #securitynoise, #webinar.
Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026. Recurring tags: #grrcon, #securitynoise, #webinar.
Compared with accounts its own size
Dave Kennedy's engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 50% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.045%, Dave Kennedy sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,567 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.696% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.7% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 60% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 7% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 60% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 214 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 8, 2026288x their median
It’s official! The live-action film of The Legend of Zelda, currently in production, will be titled The Legend of Zelda. The film is planned to be released in theatres worldwide on April 30, 2027. #TheLegendofZeldaMovie #NintendoDirect https://t.co/z1sH9DXzkK
- Sep 3, 2026265x their median
This is one of the funniest things I’ve seen in a long time. Perfect use of free will. https://t.co/vhGMbKQ0Nl
- Sep 10, 2026126x their median
It feels like OpenAI has nerfed GPT Astra. just look at this difference. the left one was built at launch of GPT Astra and the right one was built right now. https://t.co/kOiftSKwrX
- Sep 28, 202622x their median
ANTHROPIC FILES FOR IPO, PROSPECTUS SEEN BY REUTERS Here’s everything you need to know: Anthropic could seek a valuation above $2 trillion. 2025 financials: Rev: $4.59B, up 1,088% YoY from $386M Oper loss: $8.06B, widening from $2.98B GAAP net loss: $41.97B, vs $8.31B in 2024 That headline $42B net loss needs some context. Roughly $34B came from an accounting charge tied largely to the rising value of financing instruments that could eventually convert into Anthropic shares, rather than cash spent running the business. Even excluding that, the underlying operating losses remain substantial. Anthropic spent $7.33B on compute and infrastructure in 2025, up 190% YoY and nearly 3x the prior year. That alone represented: • 58% of its $12.65B in total operating expenses • Roughly 1.6x its entire annual revenue And the spending is expected to keep climbing. The prospectus outlines roughly $518B in cloud, compute and infrastructure obligations as Anthropic continues building out its AI systems. Anthropic ended 2025 with $20.28B in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments. Its two largest direct customers each accounted for 12% of revenue, meaning just two customers represented 24% of total 2025 sales. Anthropic also warned that many of its largest customers are not locked into long-term contracts and could reduce or stop spending. At the same time, the filing highlights risks around increasingly autonomous AI systems, including unexpected behavior, security concerns and potential misuse. Anthropic is competing in an increasingly expensive AI race with OpenAI, Google, Meta and xAI. Amazon and Google are also major strategic partners and investors in Anthropic, while supplying much of the cloud infrastructure needed to train and run Claude. The IPO could come after the November U.S. midterm elections and would give public-market investors one of their first pure-play ways to value a frontier AI lab. Source: Reuters
- Sep 26, 20264.1x their median
I'm seeing a lot on anti-AI folks coming out that we should not "allow" AI into cybersecurity. We aren't the gatekeepers. Businesses, boards, CEO's - it's their businesses not ours - we need to figure out a way to get our hands around it to try and to it in a way that helps organizations not shoot themselves in the foot while doing it. We need to be leading the charge on AI research, safety, governance, adoption, and more. You can be Anti-AI and hate the system, but the system isn't decided by us - we go where the system goes, even if we disagree or agree with it. It's irrelevant.
- Sep 3, 20262.6x their median
We're officially at Hell's Front Porch in Ohio. 😂🌡 https://t.co/yEwfp0lOZH
- Sep 3, 20262.6x their median
About to go on the news.... massive storm ripping through, right before I go on, power kicks out. I am so prepared for this. Everything on backup UPS and generator kicked right on. Didn't miss a beat. I'm a professionallll
- Sep 25, 20262.2x their median
Picking my son up for college to drive him to a basketball tournament - all of his friends were outside and yelled “Yoooo it’s HackingDave” 😂😂😂😂
- Sep 9, 20262.0x their median
Haven't watched the apple event, but let me guess - better camera, new colors, faster processor, and maybe better battery life? #Innovation
- Sep 26, 20261.8x their median
Hanging out with my oldest boy. Don’t get to see him much anymore loving it https://t.co/3SebAkCD3b
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 106 interactions against 234K followers, an engagement rate of 0.045%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.0K times each, and 1.31% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 288x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #grrcon, #securitynoise, #webinar.
- What is Dave Kennedy's engagement rate on X?
- Dave Kennedy (@HackingDave) has an engagement rate of 0.045%, based on the median interactions across 42 original posts from the last 30 days against 234,027 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.045%, Dave Kennedy sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,567 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @HackingDave have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @HackingDave post?
- Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.6 posts per day across the measured window.