Back to @HIMSS's profile

HIMSS engagement report

@HIMSS - 107K followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 107K followers
Per impression
0.322%
622 views on a typical post
Reach
0.58%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.6/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 107K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 7% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 622 times each, and 0.322% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.581% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14 interactions, about 7.0x its own typical post.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

HIMSS's engagement rate beats 7% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 17% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, HIMSS sits below the 10th percentile of the 213,186 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,186 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,400 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 387 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 28, 20267.0x their median

    HIMSS just made a big step forward for AI in healthcare. At #HIMSS26APAC, HIMSS announced the world’s first evidence-based AI Outcomes Framework, bringing together five leading health systems across Singapore, Korea and Taiwan to measure the real impact and value of AI in healthcare. We also announced new collaborations with Seoul National University Bundang Hospital and the Ministry of Health of Malaysia to advance digital health and AI. The goal is simple: move AI from promise to measurable impact. Learn more: https://t.co/McW4aCTmWz

    103101.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20266.5x their median

    Healthcare AI is moving into a phase where execution matters as much as ambition. At the AI in Healthcare Forum, Oct. 22-23 in San Diego, healthcare leaders will examine the decisions shaping what comes next, from building governance models that support responsible scale to using AI to strengthen the patient journey and leading enterprise transformation around the experiences of patients and the workforce. Swipe through three sessions that bring those priorities into focus. Explore the full program: https://t.co/hqUYopXtDQ

    85001.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20264.5x their median

    The future of healthcare is continuous, connected, and increasingly virtual. Join Hal Wolf and Sofia Couto da Rocha as they discuss how AI, remote monitoring, and digital health technologies are reshaping care delivery and closing care gaps. Listen now to explore the roadmap to healthcare in 2030. https://t.co/tSpPSlLnbv

    6300947 viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20264.0x their median

    HIMSS helps healthcare organizations and professionals understand what is changing in health, technology, and AI so they can lead and empower others. Our Executive Connect program helps healthcare organizations develop high-potential talent while giving individual leaders the opportunity to invest in their own growth. Through executive coaching, peer connections, digital health education and structured professional development, participants build the skills and perspectives to take on greater responsibility. Organizations that invest in future leaders retain them and grow. Individual leaders can apply directly to advance their own careers. Explore HIMSS Executive Connect: https://t.co/j7rsZa9jvP

    71001.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20264.0x their median

    At #HIMSS26APAC, health systems will share how predictive intelligence is delivering in practice, from recovery-trajectory forecasting and bed management to clinical AI that reduced delayed cardiac interventions by 90% and insights from 2.7 million patient visits a week. Oita Oka Hospital will present on how predictive models are informing their recovery trajectories, discharge planning and bed management. Seoul National University Bundang Hospital will share measurable results from AI integrated into cardiac care, including an 86% reduction in echocardiography analysis time. And Dr. Darran Foo will examine what deployment at scale reveals about structured clinical data, enterprise adoption and the next generation of AI-enabled clinical workflows. The focus is on evidence, scale and how these capabilities are being embedded into real clinical and operational workflows. See how healthcare intelligence is being put into practice at HIMSS26 APAC, 23–25 August in Singapore. Advance registration ends 22 August. https://t.co/4s3Ggtayr2

    42021.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20263.0x their median

    AI strategy is put to the test where technology meets care delivery, influencing the patient experience, shaping governance and risk, and redefining how the healthcare workforce makes decisions and shares accountability. These are not separate implementation challenges, but together, they determine whether AI can be deployed responsibly, safely, and at scale. At the HIMSS AI in Healthcare Forum San Diego, clinicians, executives, digital health leaders, researchers and innovators will examine these three strategic pillars through practical strategies, real-world case studies and the partnerships advancing AI transformation across healthcare. Join us October 22–23 in San Diego. HIMSS member preferred pricing is always available. Register today: https://t.co/DKQ8VQlqc5

    4110932 viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20262.5x their median

    What if healthcare AI were built around the patient, not the health system? On The Big Unlock, HIMSS Chief Scientific Research Officer Dr. Anne Snowdon explores what it will take to make that possible, from stronger evidence and AI-ready workforces to connected data that follows patients across their care. She also makes the case for giving people trusted AI tools that help them understand their health, make informed decisions and stay meaningfully connected to their care teams. Hear Dr. Snowdon's perspective on where healthcare AI needs to go next: https://t.co/bjrwpWxg3Y

    3101513 viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.5x their median

    Healthcare’s AI challenge is no longer whether to adopt it. It’s how to do it responsibly and at scale. Opening HIMSS APAC in Singapore, HIMSS President and CEO Hal Wolf put the patient at the center of that equation: without trust, there is no sustainable path to AI adoption. Across APAC, health systems are moving from pilots toward enterprise deployment, while grappling with governance, human oversight, clinical integration and measurable value. The playbook is still being written.

    41001.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20262.5x their median

    Most health systems aren't short on data. They're short on the evidence to know which moves actually drive quality, safety, and workforce sustainability. That's the gap HIMSS Analytics Advisory services will close. Through a dedicated HIMSS strategist and a globally benchmarked framework, we give transformation leaders the only global digital maturity benchmarks backed by evidence and synthesized by our Office of Scientific Research, not self-defined metrics. With results like these, you’ll be equipped with decisions you can defend to your board: ✅ 3.25x higher quality and safety scores ✅ 21% lower CLABSI rates ✅ 24x higher patient experience scores Digital maturity is a leading indicator of organizational performance, not just technology adoption. See how HIMSS turns insight into measurable transformation: https://t.co/Xr4kv5PdeY

    2210950 viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20262.5x their median

    Through the HIMSS global network, healthcare providers, policymakers, innovators, and technology leaders tackle complex challenges and accelerate digital transformation through shared insights and learnings. For the past eight years, the HIMSS Italian Community and HIMSS Board Chair Elena Sini have leveraged HIMSS benchmarks, advisory services, and proven frameworks to drive dramatic improvements in digital maturity across Italy’s hospitals. Discover what Italy’s health system has achieved, and what others can learn from its journey.

    41001.3K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 107K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 7% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 622 times each, and 0.322% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.581% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14 interactions, about 7.0x its own typical post.

What is HIMSS's engagement rate on X?
HIMSS (@HIMSS) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 106,980 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, HIMSS sits below the 10th percentile of the 213,186 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @HIMSS have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 7% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @HIMSS post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going