Back to @GregLake_'s profile

Greg Lake engagement report

@GregLake_ - 201K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.008%
of 201K followers
Per impression
0.276%
6.0K views on a typical post
Reach
2.97%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
16
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.3/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 16 interactions against 201K followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 6.0K times each, and 0.276% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.97% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 33K interactions, about 2037x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026. Recurring tag: #nufc.

Compared with accounts its own size

Greg Lake's engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 16% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.008%, Greg Lake sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,186 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,186 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,400 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video13% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 13% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 97 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 13, 20262037x their median

    šŸšØāšŖļøāš«ļø Newcastle are closing in on Amar Dedić deal! Personal terms agreed with 23 year old fullback. Dedić wants #NUFC move and agreement at final stages with Benfica for final fee over €30m package. šŸ‡§šŸ‡¦ https://t.co/YGxTgksai1

    30K1.4K4404474.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20261113x their median

    Lewis Hall Transfer request rescues this transfer window completely. Him and 3 midfielders and we are set

    17K55241873817K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026518x their median

    Villa and Newcastle having to sell their best players this summer. Those financial rules really starting to pay off... 18+ GambleAware https://t.co/lEgf5yoTSa

    6.3K1.6K206234971K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 2026320x their median

    šŸ‡ØšŸ‡æā­ļø š‹š®š¤ššĢš¬ĢŒ š‡šØš«š§š¢ĢšœĢŒšžš¤ (24) against Tottenham: • 90 Minutes • CLEAN SHEET • 4 Saves • 4 Saves Inside The Box • 40 Touches • 4 Recoveries šˆšŒšŒš„šƒšˆš€š“š„ šˆšŒšš€š‚š“. šŸ’„ https://t.co/4ggmK9rsB7

    4.9K1741423122K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202697x their median

    يخربيت Ų§Ł„ŁƒŲ§Ų±ŁŠŲ²Ł…Ų§ يابؓر https://t.co/8cv8Pv3JHv

    1.5K565669K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202680x their median

    🚨 EXC: Newcastle have REJECTED an offer of around Ā£10m from Nottingham Forest for Jacob Murphy āŒ Offer landed over weekend but Matthias Jaissle wants to keep experienced winger ā³ A chance the move is revisited on deadline day, but sources think unlikely as it stands #nufc https://t.co/cqZJlsYciP

    80494226163606K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202634x their median

    🚨 Inside PIF plans for #nufc - as owners double down on commitment āš«ļø PIF now value #nufc at Ā£2BILLION šŸ’ø āšŖļø Training ground kit deal done šŸ  āš«ļø Stadium timeline šŸŸ āšŖļø Sponsorship truths & EA plans āš«ļø Backing for Jaissle & 2.0 Details in big read šŸ‘‡ https://t.co/EFz5Z6obaA

    44650397145K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202626x their median

    I have this weird feeling that we might genuinely be going for El Khannouss AND Fernandez-Pardo. šŸ‡²šŸ‡¦ El Khannouss for the 10. šŸ‡§šŸ‡Ŗ Fernandez-Pardo to cover multiple positions with his versatility and to play striker/forward if Woltemade leaves. #NUFC

    386726346K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202620x their median

    Our Nico G šŸ‡ŖšŸ‡ø šŸ–¤šŸ¤ #NUFC https://t.co/mB6JwwJsOW

    2841716242K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202619x their median

    Where is Newcastle United's midfield here? Non-existent since minute one

    224871326K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#nufc

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 16 interactions against 201K followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 6.0K times each, and 0.276% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.97% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 33K interactions, about 2037x its own typical post.

What is Greg Lake's engagement rate on X?
Greg Lake (@GregLake_) has an engagement rate of 0.008%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 201,487 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.008%, Greg Lake sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,186 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @GregLake_ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @GregLake_ post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going