Greg Lake engagement report
@GregLake_ - 201K followers on X
Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 16 interactions against 201K followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 6.0K times each, and 0.276% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.97% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 33K interactions, about 2037x its own typical post.
Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026. Recurring tag: #nufc.
Compared with accounts its own size
Greg Lake's engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 16% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.008%, Greg Lake sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,186 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.147% |
| 75th percentile | 0.698% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.9% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 13% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 13% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 97 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 13, 20262037x their median
šØāŖļøā«ļø Newcastle are closing in on Amar DediÄ deal! Personal terms agreed with 23 year old fullback. DediÄ wants #NUFC move and agreement at final stages with Benfica for final fee over ā¬30m package. š§š¦ https://t.co/YGxTgksai1
- Aug 19, 20261113x their median
Lewis Hall Transfer request rescues this transfer window completely. Him and 3 midfielders and we are set
- Aug 19, 2026518x their median
Villa and Newcastle having to sell their best players this summer. Those financial rules really starting to pay off... 18+ GambleAware https://t.co/lEgf5yoTSa
- Aug 29, 2026320x their median
šØšæāļø šš®š¤šĢš¬Ģ ššØš«š§š¢ĢšĢšš¤ (24) against Tottenham: ⢠90 Minutes ⢠CLEAN SHEET ⢠4 Saves ⢠4 Saves Inside The Box ⢠40 Touches ⢠4 Recoveries ššššššššš šššššš. š„ https://t.co/4ggmK9rsB7
- Aug 29, 202697x their median
ŁŲ®Ų±ŲØŁŲŖ Ų§ŁŁŲ§Ų±ŁŲ²Ł Ų§ ŁŲ§ŲØŲ“Ų± https://t.co/8cv8Pv3JHv
- Aug 31, 202680x their median
šØ EXC: Newcastle have REJECTED an offer of around Ā£10m from Nottingham Forest for Jacob Murphy ā Offer landed over weekend but Matthias Jaissle wants to keep experienced winger ā³ A chance the move is revisited on deadline day, but sources think unlikely as it stands #nufc https://t.co/cqZJlsYciP
- Aug 21, 202634x their median
šØ Inside PIF plans for #nufc - as owners double down on commitment ā«ļø PIF now value #nufc at Ā£2BILLION šø āŖļø Training ground kit deal done š ā«ļø Stadium timeline š āŖļø Sponsorship truths & EA plans ā«ļø Backing for Jaissle & 2.0 Details in big read š https://t.co/EFz5Z6obaA
- Aug 27, 202626x their median
I have this weird feeling that we might genuinely be going for El Khannouss AND Fernandez-Pardo. š²š¦ El Khannouss for the 10. š§šŖ Fernandez-Pardo to cover multiple positions with his versatility and to play striker/forward if Woltemade leaves. #NUFC
- Aug 29, 202620x their median
Our Nico G šŖšø š¤š¤ #NUFC https://t.co/mB6JwwJsOW
- Sep 14, 202619x their median
Where is Newcastle United's midfield here? Non-existent since minute one
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 16 interactions against 201K followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 6.0K times each, and 0.276% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.97% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 33K interactions, about 2037x its own typical post.
- What is Greg Lake's engagement rate on X?
- Greg Lake (@GregLake_) has an engagement rate of 0.008%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 201,487 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.008%, Greg Lake sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,186 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @GregLake_ have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @GregLake_ post?
- Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.3 posts per day across the measured window.