Back to @Glory19MU's profile

ابو بدر ™🐼 كودي في جاهز: GR engagement report

@Glory19MU - 651K followers on X

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.081%
of 651K followers
Per impression
0.898%
59K views on a typical post
Reach
9.05%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
529
interactions (median)
Saved
0.03%
18 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.03/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 529 interactions against 651K followers, an engagement rate of 0.081%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 59K times each, and 0.898% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video and 23% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.0K interactions, about 9.4x its own typical post.

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

ابو بدر ™🐼 كودي في جاهز: GR's engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 44% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.081%, ابو بدر ™🐼 كودي في جاهز: GR sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,349 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.696%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,349 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,452 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.696%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video38% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link23% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 38% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 23% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 110 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 15, 20269.4x their median

    هههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههه هههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههه https://t.co/GktdRw5IlB

    4.7K1681324219K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20268.8x their median

    حسبي الله على اللي حط مباراة اليونايتد يوم الخميس الحين يحسبونا نلعب في اليوروباليغ https://t.co/jSIjd1JAAM

    4.5K651444480K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20268.6x their median

    ما شاء الله يا السحلي اكثر من 100 الف بالبث 🔥🔥 بهذي المناسبة نطالب ببث 72 ساعة https://t.co/f4DC0dStQ4

    4.4K170431177K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20267.2x their median

    مقطع شونق اقل ما يقال عنه تاريخي الله يديم علينا الأمن والأمان ويحفظ وطننا من كل شر 💚💚 https://t.co/P9wIMCzCDA

    3.6K141172257K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20265.0x their median

    الصدق التسريبات ظلمت GTA 6 التريلر اللي شفناه خارق 🔥🔥🔥 https://t.co/iEuwx1F83Y

    2.6K50160146K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20264.7x their median

    مستعد اراهن على شعر ابو سويحل اذا اليونايتد ما اخذ الابطال بحلق له صفر

    2.4K43438210K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20264.2x their median

    ياخي ابي افهم وش سبب الصياح على FC27 ؟ القيمبلاي اشوفه الافضل اخر 6-7 سنوات فرق المستوى بين شخص و الاخر واضح جدا و هذا المطلوب الدفاع ؟ عاجبني جدا رغم ان باقي دفاعي مب ذاك الزود و قاعد اتعلم عليه بمجرد يصير الكمبيوتر يدافع عنك هنا يختفي الشخص الماهر دفاعيا عن الشخص السيء و هذا اللي يقتل اللعبة يصير الكل محترف بالدفاع و هذا اكبر غلط في اي لعبة تنافسية انك تساوي الشخص الممتاز بالشخص العادي او السيء في النهاية كل لعبة فيها اخطاء و هذا طبيعي لكن للحين المميزات طاغية على السلبيات

    2.0K3822622390K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20263.7x their median

    عدنا يا ذات الاذنين ❤️ https://t.co/v131SmSJlq

    1.9K49464151K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20263.7x their median

    الله عليك يا مغواير حنا رجعنا ؟؟ ماسك مزراوي و تارك المهاجم https://t.co/HT81IlUJN8

    1.9K44478129K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20263.6x their median

    هههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههه هههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههه https://t.co/d3Z3ICVJ53

    1.8K6941388K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 529 interactions against 651K followers, an engagement rate of 0.081%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 59K times each, and 0.898% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video and 23% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.0K interactions, about 9.4x its own typical post.

What is ابو بدر ™🐼 كودي في جاهز: GR's engagement rate on X?
ابو بدر ™🐼 كودي في جاهز: GR (@Glory19MU) has an engagement rate of 0.081%, based on the median interactions across 26 original posts from the last 30 days against 650,547 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.081%, ابو بدر ™🐼 كودي في جاهز: GR sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,349 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Glory19MU have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Glory19MU post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going