Back to @GernaderJake's profile

GJake engagement report

@GernaderJake - 853K followers on X

Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.026%
of 853K followers
Per impression
0.784%
28K views on a typical post
Reach
3.26%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
220
interactions (median)
Saved
0.014%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.03/day
active 87% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 220 interactions against 853K followers, an engagement rate of 0.026%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 48% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 0.784% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.29% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 83x its own typical post.

Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026. Recurring tag: #gjakesneeze.

Compared with accounts its own size

GJake's engagement rate beats 48% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 41% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.026%, GJake sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.696%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,482 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,403 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.696%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video44% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link16% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 44% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 16% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 192 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 17, 202683x their median

    The dedication to this is off the charts 🤯 After 1,993 attempts at trying to throw a perfect game with Roy Oswalt in MVP Baseball 2005 this dude finally got it 🔥 (Via: jaylucarellisports/IG, sandysun_jw/TW) https://t.co/hMz9X6R2Rc

    17K9161881072.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202633x their median

    Fernando Tatis Jr. double jumping to make a catch😂 https://t.co/KTEghUwKlG

    6.6K363511181.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202612x their median

    Destiny folks, this really isn’t complicated. There were two groups of people supporting the “We Want D3” movement. Group A: Continued playing Destiny 2 with their friends. Made sure Bungie and Sony knew they wanted a future for Destiny. Posted a few We Want Destiny 3 emotes around the internet. Group B: Threatened and bullied Devs, as well as streamers who weren’t on Destiny 2. Harassed the hell out of all the people playing or supporting Marathon. Made the Destiny community look like a bunch of entitled immature children. You all fall under the same category. Group A and B are both “We Want Destiny 3” people. But Group A did so in a commendable, responsible, and mature way, while Group B caused tons of damage and now boasts around like they saved Destiny. Group A folks gotta stop taking offense when people are upset with Group B folks ❤️

    2.3K17915311131K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 202612x their median

    Wait…. DESTINY IS COMING BACK?!?!?

    2.5K6930045K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 202610x their median

    I don’t care if I have to wait 5 years… If I eventually get to play a fresh, NEW Destiny game, I am going to be so happy.

    2.2K8613230K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 202610.0x their median

    I’m gonna be straight up, I have no idea how to feel right now about the Destiny news. I’m excited: I LOVE Destiny. I have streamed and played an absurd number of hours. It’s been my life at times. So much community, so many memories… it coming back is incredible 🥹 I’m annoyed: I spent months grieving the loss of Destiny. Going through that process absolutely sucked, was it completely unnecessary? I’m terrified: Can we ACTUALLY trust what Bungie is telling us? They told us Destiny was done, now they’re telling us it’s not? Will Sony give them the leash they need to actually come through on this promise? Are we going to get pulled back in just to have our hearts broken again? A big mix of emotions for sure. I really hope there is a legitimate future for Destiny ❤️

    2.0K86103772K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20269.0x their median

    Do I wish Bungie never made Marathon? Yes. Do I wish they focused on a new Destiny? Yes. Do I think Marathon and Bungie are in serious trouble? Yes. But do I think Marathon is actually gonna be a banger game in December (so long as it has a player base)? Yes.

    1.8K391485105K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20268.7x their median

    There will ALWAYS be a part of me SO frustrated at Bungie for trying to make all these other games & projects instead of just fully committing to a Destiny 3. Felt like SUCH a reckless gamble when Marathon news broke back in 2023, and it has proven to be 😔

    1.8K7152659K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20267.7x their median

    A plot twist for the ages at the end https://t.co/Lc3V6o9KHT

    1.6K4115086K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20267.7x their median

    I want a Destiny 3 as bad as anyone. I fucking LOVE the game. I streamed more hours of Destiny than anyone in the world. My career was completely staked in Destiny. But this “NEVER STOP TALKING ABOUT DESTINY, NEVER STOP DEMANDING MORE DESTINY” mentality feels really bad. It has cannibalized the community. It has made is so those who want to grieve and move on are villainized for doing so. I want a Destiny 3. But I also want to be realistic and be able to move on without being considered a traitor for doing so.

    1.5K701417107K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#gjakesneeze

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 220 interactions against 853K followers, an engagement rate of 0.026%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 48% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 0.784% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.29% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 83x its own typical post.

What is GJake's engagement rate on X?
GJake (@GernaderJake) has an engagement rate of 0.026%, based on the median interactions across 45 original posts from the last 30 days against 853,282 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.026%, GJake sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @GernaderJake have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 48% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @GernaderJake post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going