GJake engagement report
@GernaderJake - 853K followers on X
Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 220 interactions against 853K followers, an engagement rate of 0.026%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 48% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 0.784% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.29% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 83x its own typical post.
Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026. Recurring tag: #gjakesneeze.
Compared with accounts its own size
GJake's engagement rate beats 48% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 41% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.026%, GJake sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.696% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.9% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 44% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 16% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 44% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 16% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 192 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 17, 202683x their median
The dedication to this is off the charts 🤯 After 1,993 attempts at trying to throw a perfect game with Roy Oswalt in MVP Baseball 2005 this dude finally got it 🔥 (Via: jaylucarellisports/IG, sandysun_jw/TW) https://t.co/hMz9X6R2Rc
- Aug 24, 202633x their median
Fernando Tatis Jr. double jumping to make a catch😂 https://t.co/KTEghUwKlG
- Sep 24, 202612x their median
Destiny folks, this really isn’t complicated. There were two groups of people supporting the “We Want D3” movement. Group A: Continued playing Destiny 2 with their friends. Made sure Bungie and Sony knew they wanted a future for Destiny. Posted a few We Want Destiny 3 emotes around the internet. Group B: Threatened and bullied Devs, as well as streamers who weren’t on Destiny 2. Harassed the hell out of all the people playing or supporting Marathon. Made the Destiny community look like a bunch of entitled immature children. You all fall under the same category. Group A and B are both “We Want Destiny 3” people. But Group A did so in a commendable, responsible, and mature way, while Group B caused tons of damage and now boasts around like they saved Destiny. Group A folks gotta stop taking offense when people are upset with Group B folks ❤️
- Sep 21, 202612x their median
Wait…. DESTINY IS COMING BACK?!?!?
- Sep 21, 202610x their median
I don’t care if I have to wait 5 years… If I eventually get to play a fresh, NEW Destiny game, I am going to be so happy.
- Sep 21, 202610.0x their median
I’m gonna be straight up, I have no idea how to feel right now about the Destiny news. I’m excited: I LOVE Destiny. I have streamed and played an absurd number of hours. It’s been my life at times. So much community, so many memories… it coming back is incredible 🥹 I’m annoyed: I spent months grieving the loss of Destiny. Going through that process absolutely sucked, was it completely unnecessary? I’m terrified: Can we ACTUALLY trust what Bungie is telling us? They told us Destiny was done, now they’re telling us it’s not? Will Sony give them the leash they need to actually come through on this promise? Are we going to get pulled back in just to have our hearts broken again? A big mix of emotions for sure. I really hope there is a legitimate future for Destiny ❤️
- Sep 15, 20269.0x their median
Do I wish Bungie never made Marathon? Yes. Do I wish they focused on a new Destiny? Yes. Do I think Marathon and Bungie are in serious trouble? Yes. But do I think Marathon is actually gonna be a banger game in December (so long as it has a player base)? Yes.
- Aug 18, 20268.7x their median
There will ALWAYS be a part of me SO frustrated at Bungie for trying to make all these other games & projects instead of just fully committing to a Destiny 3. Felt like SUCH a reckless gamble when Marathon news broke back in 2023, and it has proven to be 😔
- Aug 22, 20267.7x their median
A plot twist for the ages at the end https://t.co/Lc3V6o9KHT
- Aug 26, 20267.7x their median
I want a Destiny 3 as bad as anyone. I fucking LOVE the game. I streamed more hours of Destiny than anyone in the world. My career was completely staked in Destiny. But this “NEVER STOP TALKING ABOUT DESTINY, NEVER STOP DEMANDING MORE DESTINY” mentality feels really bad. It has cannibalized the community. It has made is so those who want to grieve and move on are villainized for doing so. I want a Destiny 3. But I also want to be realistic and be able to move on without being considered a traitor for doing so.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 220 interactions against 853K followers, an engagement rate of 0.026%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 48% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 0.784% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.29% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 83x its own typical post.
- What is GJake's engagement rate on X?
- GJake (@GernaderJake) has an engagement rate of 0.026%, based on the median interactions across 45 original posts from the last 30 days against 853,282 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.026%, GJake sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @GernaderJake have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 48% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @GernaderJake post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.03 posts per day across the measured window.