Back to @GermanosPeter's profile

Peter Germanos بيتر جرمانوس engagement report

@GermanosPeter - 161K followers on X

Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.083%
of 161K followers
Per impression
1.76%
7.6K views on a typical post
Reach
4.72%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
133
interactions (median)
Saved
0.092%
7 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.67/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
07:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 133 interactions against 161K followers, an engagement rate of 0.083%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 50% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.6K times each, and 1.76% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.71% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 83x its own typical post.

Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Peter Germanos بيتر جرمانوس's engagement rate beats 50% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 57% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.083%, Peter Germanos بيتر جرمانوس sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,098 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,393 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video56% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link4% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 56% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 4% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 386 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 26, 202683x their median

    عدن - اليمن - 1960 ما الذي حصل للشرق الاوسط ؟! https://t.co/dtjw6ofWA3

    8.3K1.5K1.1K2601.0M viewsView on X
  • Oct 27, 202632x their median

    🚨 حكومات العالم تطلب من مواطنيها تخزين المواد الأساسية والاستعداد لحالات الطوارئ! 🇬🇧 بريطانيا: 3 أيام 🇯🇵 اليابان: 3 أيام 🇧🇪 بلجيكا: 72 ساعة 🇮🇪 إيرلندا: «كونوا مستعدين للطوارئ» 🇫🇷 فرنسا: 72 ساعة 🇩🇪 ألمانيا: من 3 إلى 10 أيام 🇳🇱 هولندا: 72 ساعة 🇵🇱 بولندا: 3 أيام 🇸🇪 السويد: أسبوع كامل 🇳🇴 النرويج: أسبوع كامل 🇫🇮 فنلندا: 72 ساعة 🇩🇰 الدنمارك: 3 أيام 🇪🇪 إستونيا: أسبوع كامل 🇱🇻 لاتفيا: 72 ساعة 🇱🇹 ليتوانيا: 72 ساعة 🇨🇭 سويسرا: أسبوع كامل 🇹🇼 تايوان: 7 أيام 🇪🇺 الاتحاد الأوروبي: 72 ساعة 17 دولة، بالإضافة إلى الاتحاد الأوروبي، تدعو مواطنيها إلى الاستعداد للطوارئ. ❗ السؤال: ماذا تعرف هذه الحكومات ولا نعرفه نحن؟🔔

    3.2K676292108851K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 202623x their median

    🚨 لماذا بعض العرب (وهم قلة) ممن تحصل على فرصة عمل في السعودية ويتكسب منها ويتعيش هو وابناءه من خيرات البلد يقوم بالتهجم على السعودية ويتمنى لها الضرر ويحاربها؟ شيء غريب.

    1.7K4338203494K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20267.2x their median

    "The Middle East is in fact the most unequal region in the world, with both enormous inequality between countries and large inequality within countries." By Thomas Piketty, Facundo Alvaredo, & Lydia Assouad https://t.co/8QtbvGz3ij https://t.co/I9IFlb5ugZ

    6562094748232K viewsView on X
  • Oct 26, 20265.8x their median

    📍 أخطأنا عندما ذهبنا إلى محور عبد الناصر. 📍 أخطأنا عندما ذهبنا إلى محور الاتحاد السوفياتي. 📍 أخطأنا عندما ذهبنا إلى محور ياسر عرفات. 📍 أخطأنا عندما ذهبنا إلى محور حافظ الأسد. 📍 أخطأنا عندما ذهبنا إلى المحور الإيراني. 📍 واليوم، يُقال لنا إننا أخطأنا لأننا لم نختر مسار إسلام آباد! 📍 وغداً، ربما نكتشف أن الخلاص في بكين! أما آن الأوان أن يكون للبنان محور واحد اسمه لبنان؟

    6563484334K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20264.8x their median

    كل هذه الانفاق الضخمة في الجنوب لم يشاهدها اليونيفل ؟ @UNIFIL_ @UN

    507299599.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20264.7x their median

    سيناريو مرعب يلوح في الأفق 🇮🇷 🇺🇸 🇮🇱 🇺🇦 🇪🇺 🇾🇪 🇸🇦 🇷🇺 🇫🇷 🇬🇧 تُغلق إيران باب المندب، فتشتعل حرب الطاقة وتشنّ الولايات المتحدة هجوماً واسعاً على طهران. وفي أوروبا، تتحول المواجهة الأوكرانية إلى صدام مباشر بين روسية والقوى الأوروبية. بالتزامن، تندلع حرب مدمّرة بين إسرائيل وحزب الله، تمتد نيرانها إلى شرق المتوسط والمنطقة. ثلاثة ميادين مشتعلة، اقتصاد عالمي ينهار، وعالم يقف على حافة حرب كبرى.

    5033979455K viewsView on X
  • Oct 26, 20264.3x their median

    بعد توقيف علي الكيالي، تتوارد الأنباء عن العثور على جثمان السوري علي عاقل في لبنان، وسط غموض يحيط بظروف وفاته. سبق أن طالبنا الحكومة بمنع تحوّل لبنان إلى ملاذ لرجال المنظومة الأمنية والعسكرية التابعة لنظام الأسد السابق. لبنان ليس ملجأً للمطلوبين بجرائم الدم، ولا ساحةً لتصفية الحسابات. العدالة مسؤولية الدولة، لا فرق الاغتيال.

    4962840230K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20264.2x their median

    25000 شاب يموتون كل شهر على الجبهة الاوكرانية حرب عبثية تشبه عبثية الحرب العالمية الاولى فعلا امر مخجل بحق الأوروبيين الذين يدعون الحضارة

    5061637513K viewsView on X
  • Oct 27, 20264.0x their median

    🚨 هناك شيء كبير يحصل لا نعرفه! 🇯🇵 اليابان تستعد لإطلاق نداء طارئ إلى جميع مواطنيها في 2 تشرين الثاني 2026، يدعوهم إلى تخزين الغذاء والمياه ومستلزمات الطوارئ لمدة أسبوع، بالتزامن مع إنشاء وكالة وطنية جديدة لإدارة الكوارث. وزير إدارة الكوارث الياباني غوشي هوسونو يتحدث عن الاستعداد لزلازل عملاقة وكوارث قد تهدد البلاد. هل تعرف طوكيو شيئاً لا نعرفه؟

    4274948363K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 133 interactions against 161K followers, an engagement rate of 0.083%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 50% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.6K times each, and 1.76% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.71% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 83x its own typical post.

What is Peter Germanos بيتر جرمانوس's engagement rate on X?
Peter Germanos بيتر جرمانوس (@GermanosPeter) has an engagement rate of 0.083%, based on the median interactions across 45 original posts from the last 30 days against 160,757 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.083%, Peter Germanos بيتر جرمانوس sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @GermanosPeter have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 50% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @GermanosPeter post?
Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going