Back to @Geiger_Capital's profile

Geiger Capital engagement report

@Geiger_Capital - 372K followers on X

Measured over 51 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.282%
of 372K followers
Per impression
1.67%
61K views on a typical post
Reach
16.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.076%
47 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.3/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 372K followers, an engagement rate of 0.282%. Measured over 51 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 61K times each, and 1.67% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 51 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 49K interactions, about 48x its own typical post.

Measured over 51 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Geiger Capital's engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 61% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.282%, Geiger Capital sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,349 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.696%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.696%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,349 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,452 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.696%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video75% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link2% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 75% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 164 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 11, 202648x their median

    Front page of the NYT website… On the morning of 9/11. Fuck you. https://t.co/VbtLLwi0ey

    44K4.4K756353753K viewsView on X
  • Mar 20, 202628x their median

    The Romans would’ve just dug another strait.

    34K2.2K5322623.5M viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 202635x their median

    Officially deleted instagram. An inherently female app. Zero benefit.

    33K2.0K9512981.6M viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 202626x their median

    Realizing that 8 "far-right" candidates have won in Latin America since USAID was defunded https://t.co/NL308nW6cS

    24K2.3K169118473K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202622x their median

    Recibí en Barranquilla al secretario de Estado de los Estados Unidos, Marco Rubio, y a su esposa, Jeanette Rubio. Este encuentro de alto nivel ratifica, con hechos y absoluta determinación, que la alianza estratégica entre Colombia y los Estados Unidos está más firme que nunca. Avanzamos en una agenda conjunta para fortalecer la seguridad regional, combatir frontalmente el narcoterrorismo, cumplir y colaborar en los asuntos fronterizos y abrir nuevas oportunidades de inversión, desarrollo y prosperidad para nuestros pueblos. Colombia retoma su liderazgo internacional con seriedad, carácter y una diplomacia de resultados, no de discursos. ¡Firme por la Patria! ¡Viva Cristo Rey! (A.D.L.E.) 🇨🇴🐅

    18K3.6K499107293K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 202617x their median

    Tom Homan explaining basic immigration law to a CBS reporter… CBS: "Rep. Maria Salazar cited the stat that 50% of ICE detainees don't have an additional criminal charge here." Homan: "Are they in the country illegally?" CBS: "Yes." Homan: "Then they are deportable." CBS: "But so are millions of people…" Homan: "Yea… if you’re in the country illegally you got a problem. You shouldn’t be here."

    15K1.7K28486336K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 202611x their median

    A French grandmother lives 93 years, survives Nazi occupation and economic depression, only to be raped and murdered by a recently imported third-world savage. It’s time to start hanging people. https://t.co/gjVHRvVCQE

    9.8K1.6K227117322K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20269.9x their median

    I’d prefer Elon be in charge of the runaway, homicidal AI over both Altman and Dario.

    9.4K40238355248K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20267.5x their median

    Ankit Gupta just did incalculable damage to YCombinator.

    7.2K25021924506K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20265.4x their median

    Kevin Warsh: "I’m going to hike rates. You guys better get ready. I’m gonna do it!" The market: https://t.co/GPx5OpwZWo

    5.0K40211140306K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 372K followers, an engagement rate of 0.282%. Measured over 51 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 61K times each, and 1.67% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 51 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 49K interactions, about 48x its own typical post.

What is Geiger Capital's engagement rate on X?
Geiger Capital (@Geiger_Capital) has an engagement rate of 0.282%, based on the median interactions across 51 original posts from the last 30 days against 371,918 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.282%, Geiger Capital sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,349 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Geiger_Capital have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Geiger_Capital post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going