Back to @GQMexico's profile

GQ México y Latam engagement report

@GQMexico - 1.0M followers on X

Measured over 471 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 1.0M followers
Per impression
0.161%
622 views on a typical post
Reach
0.06%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
15.97/day
active 103% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 1.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 471 original posts, its engagement rate beats 2% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 622 times each, and 0.161% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 16 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 471 posts sampled, 22% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.7K interactions, about 1679x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #carrie, #crystallake, #elexorcista.

Measured over 471 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #carrie, #crystallake, #elexorcista.

Compared with accounts its own size

GQ México y Latam's engagement rate beats 2% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 11% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, GQ México y Latam sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.695%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,270 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,455 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.695%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video22% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 22% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 168 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 25, 20261679x their median

    Hudson Williams estrenó el traje de baño que verás en playas (y calles) a partir de ahora 😎https://t.co/QjcBZpBNng https://t.co/OIQtsg1MtA

    1.5K15971255K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026585x their median

    La silueta de estos shorts es tan versátil que no sólo les querrás usar en la alberca o el mar… pero (aún) no los puedes comprar. Te contamos todo de ellos. https://t.co/QjcBZpClcO

    477103326.4K viewsView on X
  • Oct 27, 2026487x their median

    Con más de 80 millones de suscriptores en YouTube, Fede Vigevani se ha convertido en uno de los creadores de contenido más influyentes de habla hispana. Sin embargo, detrás de los millones de reproducciones, los grandes proyectos y el éxito, hay alguien que nunca parece estar satisfecho con lo que ha conseguido. Para nuestra más reciente portada, el emprendedor uruguayo y reciente embajador de @garnierlatam nos habla en exclusiva sobre su ambición, los sacrificios que ha hecho para llegar hasta aquí, la responsabilidad de conectar con millones de personas y su necesidad de reinventarse constantemente. Porque si algo tiene claro Fede es que, por más lejos que llegue, siempre habrá una nueva meta por conquistar. Lee la entrevista completa: https://t.co/ZTa9FjSzne Texto: Aldair Téllez     
Foto: Álex Salinas      
Asistente de foto: Alberto Galicia
Estilismo: Daniel Zazueta
Hair and makeup: Luz González
Dirección de arte: Anaceci Avilez y Jocelyn Nolasco
Editor de moda: Eduardo Limón
Web editor: Mario Cabrera
Deputy editor: Jesús Germán
Head of Editorial Content: Alejandro Ortiz

    3747921139.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 2026217x their median

    “Lo que más me gusta de este oficio es aprender. Pero también explorar, aunque con la exploración existe la gran posibilidad de fallar, que es lo más excitante de todo y que lo hago muy comúnmente”. —Alejandro G. Iñárritu Nueve años de trabajo llevaron al cineasta mexicano a Digger, una película que reconoce haber aprendido a hacer sobre la marcha. En conversación con GQ México y Latinoamérica, Iñárritu habla del riesgo de crear sin tener todas las respuestas, de su mirada sobre el poder y la humanidad y de la confianza absoluta que encontró en Tom Cruise para explorar un terreno nuevo para ambos: https://t.co/xvZKycUwH7

    18531106.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 2026174x their median

    Esta serie documental explora el caso de 'Zona Divas', un perverso portal en el que se anunciaban scorts en México 👉 https://t.co/U2nhtaEXrL https://t.co/NtQQOM9snS

    151221026K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 2026161x their median

    Alejandro G. Iñárritu tardó nueve años en llevar Diggera la pantalla. En el camino hubo viajes al Ártico y la Antártida, cinco reescrituras, sets construidos desde cero, errores, cambios y una complicidad creativa con Tom Cruise que terminó siendo clave para la película. En vísperas del estreno de su noveno largometraje, hablamos en exclusiva con el director mexicano sobre el caos detrás de la creación, el poder, la inteligencia artificial, la necesidad de seguir aprendiendo y esa parte del cine que, para él, ningún algoritmo puede reemplazar: el cuerpo, el accidente, la intuición y las personas. Esta es la historia detrás de Digger. https://t.co/Fowx6EGl0S Texto: @jesusgerman_ Fotografías: @rammartinezp Asistente de foto: @luisealvarez Estilismo: @eduardo.citronne Asistente de estilismo: @danielzazuetac Maquillaje: @luzgonzalezvg Dirección de Arte: @anace_alo y @tucelyn Editor Web: @mariocabre_ Head of Editorial Content: @yosoymatu

    13128114.9K viewsView on X
  • Oct 27, 2026154x their median

    “Hay que estar constantemente innovando el contenido; esa es la clave número uno. Si no evolucionas, uno se estanca”. —Fede Vigevani En 2014, el uruguayo comenzó a crear contenido como un pasatiempo. El protagonista de nuestra nueva portada habla de la exigencia detrás de cada video, la responsabilidad de conectar con millones y una ambición que lo obliga a buscar siempre la siguiente meta. Encuentra la entrevista completa: https://t.co/ZTa9FjSzne

    11632512.7K viewsView on X
  • Oct 26, 2026132x their median

    Aitana protagoniza nuestra nueva portada en un momento que ya anticipa su siguiente etapa. #SUPERESTRELLA, la canción que quería dejar como una joya por descubrir dentro de CUARTO AZUL, terminó convirtiéndose en un fenómeno global. Ahora, con tres Auditorios Nacionales agotados en Ciudad de México y una gira por Estados Unidos por delante, la artista española prepara un álbum para 2027: un pop más divertido, irónico y pensado para disfrutar sobre el escenario. En esta entrevista exclusiva, conversamos sobre la exigencia con la que revisa su carrera, la importancia de cuidar su salud mental, lo que quiere para su futuro, y también sobre la responsabilidad de usar su voz. Encuentra la entrevista completa: https://t.co/DbOerjU7oG

    10329002.0K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 2026122x their median

    Nike recupera uno de los tenis para correr más importantes de su historia. Lisa, la estrella de Blackpink, presenta los Moon Shoe allí donde su nombre tiene cabida: en la Luna. https://t.co/BbsQLVCvPf

    9032002.9K viewsView on X
  • Oct 27, 202687x their median

    Con millones de seguidores y una carrera que no deja de crecer, el creador uruguayo habla sobre su ambición, los sacrificios y la necesidad de reinventarse para mantenerse vigente. https://t.co/HxG6C92vv1

    7113121.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#carrie#crystallake#elexorcista#gqhype#superestrella

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 1.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 471 original posts, its engagement rate beats 2% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 622 times each, and 0.161% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 16 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 471 posts sampled, 22% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.7K interactions, about 1679x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #carrie, #crystallake, #elexorcista.

What is GQ México y Latam's engagement rate on X?
GQ México y Latam (@GQMexico) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 471 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,032,181 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, GQ México y Latam sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @GQMexico have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 2% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @GQMexico post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 15.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going