Back to @FranAltomare's profile

Fran Altomare engagement report

@FranAltomare - 235K followers on X

Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.082%
of 235K followers
Per impression
0.713%
27K views on a typical post
Reach
11.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
192
interactions (median)
Saved
0.063%
17 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.93/day
active 100% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 192 interactions against 235K followers, an engagement rate of 0.082%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 0.713% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.8K interactions, about 9.3x its own typical post.

Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026. Recurring tag: #garlasco.

Compared with accounts its own size

Fran Altomare's engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 34% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.082%, Fran Altomare sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,925 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9983.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,925 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,436 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video98% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 98% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 100 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 24, 20239.3x their median

    Da quando ho iniziato a rispondere a qualche Creator ed Influencer di Instagram, solitamente per far emergere contenuti improbabili, competenze inesistenti e opinioni discutibili, vengo accusato di far partire “shitstorm”. Anime belle, non funziona così. La maggior parte degli influencer - io non mi ritengo parte della categoria, perché, al massimo, vi influenzo sull’andare a comprare merce da Angela e Bella Fisica - gode di un privilegio: una platea senza contraddittorio in cui l’unica possibilità di discussione è un box di commenti - pubblico o privato, spesso moderato - molte volte neanche considerato. Se hai 200.000 followers e te la prendi ingiustamente con una realtà che ne ha 1.000, cercare un contraddittorio su un terreno numericamente paritario (o quasi) è doveroso. Se in un video da mezzo milione di views dici che le donne devono darla via in cambio di una borsa per comprendere il loro potere, è normale aspettarsi che qualcuno non sia d’accordo. Soprattutto se vendi dei corsi in cui ti spacci per una “love coach” e provi a sostituirti a psicologi e terapeuti. Se in un video dici di essere un maestro di stile, ma storicamente compri merce contraffatta, ironizzare sul tuo personaggio è legittimo. Se in un video dici che nella tua azienda non si riposa mai perché solo Dio può riposare, è doveroso far notare che hai un modo di vedere il lavoro totalmente fuori dal tempo. Se in un video mangi carne di pollo cruda e dai consigli su come proteggerti dal sole usando il burro chiarificato, è letteralmente un dovere combattere la disinformazione che fai davanti a (centinaia di) migliaia di persone. Che magari ti credono. Usi un elicottero per gettare coriandoli in occasione della prima comunione di tua figlia? Che ci resti almeno il diritto di riderne. Poi, non sono (siamo) infallibili e ci riserviamo anche il diritto di perculare per molto meno. Prima o poi sbaglierò anche io, così come ho già fatto in passato. Capita. Sono io la persona giusta per far emergere quanto detto? Non credo sia rilevante, di base esercito solo un diritto: quello di dire ciò che penso. Anche se questo attira una mole di insulti mica da ridere. Ma va bene così. Tutto questo solo per dire che non qui tutti hanno gli strumenti per comprendere davvero i contenuti proposti da chi ha un grande pubblico. Soprattutto se non si è familiari al concetto di responsabilità. Ciao!

    1.5K104125122.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20268.0x their median

    Eh, grazie al cazzo. https://t.co/MLmGSJRG3W

    1.5K1718151K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20266.2x their median

    Scusaci Rebecca se respiriamo la tua stessa aria. https://t.co/EhN4NcrNsC

    1.0K912845537K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20266.0x their median

    Ho baciato la mia commercialista per gli auguri di Natale con più trasporto di loro. https://t.co/p8dKaoeFe8

    1.1K2344164K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20265.5x their median

    Il pianto a secco di lui. Wanna Marchi aveva ragione. https://t.co/n7vfrTzXlp

    9591868658K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20263.4x their median

    Non credo dormirò stanotte. https://t.co/8uVsRh330F

    506241191284K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20263.4x their median

    La quantità di luci accese in pieno giorno. E comunque al buio resta. https://t.co/IpfWo8KFFF

    5141510511227K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20263.3x their median

    Qualcuno lo porti via da lì. https://t.co/S0Jkc9HUGe

    51421947104K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20263.2x their median

    Gli americani sono un esperimento sociale, parte 121.577.001. https://t.co/vgvcWfXLTF

    54129361652K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20263.1x their median

    Cancelliamo il bollo auto ma lo Stato recuperi tassando chiunque tamburelli con le unghie sugli oggetti. https://t.co/xwSPefwvtF

    5141667253K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#garlasco

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 192 interactions against 235K followers, an engagement rate of 0.082%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 0.713% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.8K interactions, about 9.3x its own typical post.

What is Fran Altomare's engagement rate on X?
Fran Altomare (@FranAltomare) has an engagement rate of 0.082%, based on the median interactions across 55 original posts from the last 30 days against 234,989 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.082%, Fran Altomare sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,925 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @FranAltomare have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @FranAltomare post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going