šššššš engagement report
@FUTWIZ - 383K followers on X
Measured over 82 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 334 interactions against 383K followers, an engagement rate of 0.087%. Measured over 82 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 37K times each, and 0.91% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.59% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 82 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 17% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 27K interactions, about 82x its own typical post.
Measured over 82 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
šššššš's engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 44% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.087%, šššššš sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.696% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.9% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 126 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 25, 202682x their median
750 Coins vs 10K š https://t.co/XOEoonYYJc
- Sep 22, 202611x their median
125 Owners 0 Games Played š https://t.co/rs3AQMNFOG
- Aug 31, 202610x their median
So how much do we think this trio will cost? https://t.co/4q88xAwcvg
- Aug 29, 20269.2x their median
POV you load into your first WL game... ššļø https://t.co/9zA8419Eaj
- Sep 27, 20266.4x their median
Gold Re-Roll SBC Seems like a pretty good pack and not that expensive ā āŖļø3x83s āŖļø1x Bronze Have you had any luck from them? https://t.co/hDI0LRiyyc
- Aug 25, 20266.3x their median
My LA LIGA Starter Team š https://t.co/HLHhxV4BlE
- Aug 30, 20266.3x their median
Well... wasn't expecting that 𤯠https://t.co/sOEq1KvxpF
- Sep 6, 20266.1x their median
The lowest rated card in FIFA history 𤯠The reason for the card is unknown but there was a rumor that: In FIFA 10 Ian Baraclough (the Manager of Scunthorpe) scored from an out of play ball from his coaching area... It didn't count of course but EA gave him the 25 rated Bronze inform card š¤
- Aug 25, 20265.7x their median
THE BEST OBLAK BUILD ā The best GK in the game for 100K! https://t.co/bLVwXy0IV1
- Sep 7, 20265.5x their median
On FIFA 11 we got a 48 rated inform Wallyson card 𤯠He got this card for scoring a 48 yard screamer against Corinthians ā https://t.co/gsDvVX6E8G
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 334 interactions against 383K followers, an engagement rate of 0.087%. Measured over 82 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 37K times each, and 0.91% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.59% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 82 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 17% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 27K interactions, about 82x its own typical post.
- What is šššššš's engagement rate on X?
- šššššš (@FUTWIZ) has an engagement rate of 0.087%, based on the median interactions across 82 original posts from the last 30 days against 382,800 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.087%, šššššš sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @FUTWIZ have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @FUTWIZ post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.3 posts per day across the measured window.