Elise Quevedo #WomenInTech #Innovation engagement report
@EliseQuevedo - 247K followers on X
Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 247K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 578 times each, and 1.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.234% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.97 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video, 18% are part of a thread and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 491 interactions, about 61x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ecoc2026, #aema, #connectedbritain.
Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #ecoc2026, #aema, #connectedbritain.
Compared with accounts its own size
Elise Quevedo #WomenInTech #Innovation's engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 52% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.003%, Elise Quevedo #WomenInTech #Innovation sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,567 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.696% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.7% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 73% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 36% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 73% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 36% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 353 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 1, 202661x their median
Tonight: Leo Atlas 8 (LA-08) Atlas V rolled to the pad with 29 Leo satellites ā our final mission on Atlas V before transitioning to Vulcan with @ULAlaunch. Launch is set for Thurs, Jul 2 at 12:24 a.m. ET from SLC-41. Livestream here: https://t.co/X3PZB9pftv https://t.co/5MJJJD3BTC
- Aug 11, 202115x their median
An update reel on my journey as an Author, Speaker, Advisor & Storyteller In front or behind the cameras, thank you to everyone I get to collaborate with. #TogetherWeAreStronger š "Don't use digital to impress people, use it to impact people" https://t.co/89ccNyPzLN https://t.co/2ldLWBU4eM
- Sep 21, 20262.4x their median
Day 1 at @ECOC_Exhibition complete. Insightful conversations and more learnings about what matters in optical networks. My indepth tour of components at the @OiForum with President Nathan Tracy was eye opening I'll share thoughts on my after event research note #ECOC2026 https://t.co/iLlmhiiBcf
- Sep 14, 20261.6x their median
Heading across to the @ECOC_Exhibition next week š¤ Get in touch to share solution briefings with me ECOC 2026 should offer practical perspectives on how the optical industry intends to support the next phase of the AI supercycle See you at #ECOC2026 https://t.co/mQLBe1Biby https://t.co/J7baM82nE2
- Aug 11, 2026
In the latest LoneStar Advisory & Research piece for @Forbes Chief Analyst @WillTownTech focuses on how Frontier AI is transforming cybersecurity, enabling bad actors to launch autonomous attacks at machine speed š I recap & share a few extra insights https://t.co/1WyorjVX47
- Sep 22, 2026
Congratulations to the @ECOC_Exhibition award winners, who continue to inspire the next generation. š¤ From best optical module to best optical comms innovation, they all bring a unique perspective to the optical industry The best is yet to come #ECOC2026 #ECOC26 https://t.co/mzc3CIaAa2
- Aug 24, 2026
In this video field note, I recap @WillTownTech research note titled "Three Big Takeaways from @BlackHatEvents USA 2026" š The ever-growing and AI-infused threat landscape journey continues #BHUSA https://t.co/7besbq6iJj
- Sep 9, 2026
Insightful panel at #ConnectedBritain 2026 led by LoneStar Advisory & Research Chief Analyst @WillTownTech Discussing Open RAN as deployment in the UK @totaltelecom https://t.co/kBTgv0NuZi
- Sep 21, 2026
Strong start to the day discussing AI driving everything. Leading vendor Acacia says optimizing for GPU utilization is the key metric for success @ECOC_Exhibition #ECOC2026 https://t.co/Wbu5B3VhlZ
- Sep 10, 2026
Getting a better understanding of @lumentechco @alkiranet The Programmable Network for the AI Era during the analyst webinar. Jim, Scott, and Atif are sharing many insights. The use cases are interesting. Will share more soon. https://t.co/BHcSbDGSaG
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 247K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 578 times each, and 1.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.234% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.97 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video, 18% are part of a thread and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 491 interactions, about 61x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ecoc2026, #aema, #connectedbritain.
- What is Elise Quevedo #WomenInTech #Innovation's engagement rate on X?
- Elise Quevedo #WomenInTech #Innovation (@EliseQuevedo) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 246,836 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.003%, Elise Quevedo #WomenInTech #Innovation sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,567 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @EliseQuevedo have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @EliseQuevedo post?
- Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.97 posts per day across the measured window.