Kyama ⚽ engagement report
@ElijahKyama_ - 169K followers on X
Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 149 interactions against 169K followers, an engagement rate of 0.088%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 0.588% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 15.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36K interactions, about 241x its own typical post.
Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026. Recurring tag: #mufc.
Compared with accounts its own size
Kyama ⚽'s engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 29% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.088%, Kyama ⚽ sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.147% |
| 75th percentile | 0.698% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.8% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 94% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 6% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 94% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 254 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 21, 2026241x their median
“Whatever system you play… If you don’t run, don’t run forward or don’t run back you’re not going to win”
- Oct 21, 2026172x their median
Rúben Amorim is just the third manager in @acmilan history to go unbeaten in his first seven Serie A matches 💪 https://t.co/0OUjP2cfrS
- Sep 14, 2025133x their median
Jose Mourinho explaining to Gary Neville the difference between tactical system & principles of play. "All the good teams they defend compact. It’s just a basic principle.” Pundits blaming Amorim's system for bad defending are clueless. Football basics! https://t.co/Y1hEsnkK75
- Sep 19, 2026110x their median
How does Brighton keep losing their best players and still come back looking even stronger every season?
- Sep 19, 202665x their median
The only manager who could have achieved the so called process and complete rebuild is Ruben Amorim and the main reason he failed is because of Bruno Fernandes.
- Sep 19, 202651x their median
Fabian Hürzeler is going to be the new Premier League manager in demand next summer if he keeps this up.
- Sep 18, 202618x their median
Funny Carrick is somehow under pressure yet Amorim was allowed to lose games for literally months and not once did I see anything to suggest he was under pressure
- Oct 19, 202615x their median
🚨 BREAKING: Michael Carrick RETAINS the board’s backing as Manchester United head coach for now. Jason Wilcox had a MEETING with Carrick today. United’s board are unhappy with the results so far, and want to see an improvement. #MUFC [@SullyTalkz] https://t.co/ct3fLmfo5t
- Oct 22, 202615x their median
Julian Nagelsmann is expected to be a leading candidate for the Manchester United job if the club decide to sack under-fire head coach Michael Carrick. Telegraph Sport understands that the former Germany and Bayern Munich manager would like the role if a change happens⤵️ https://t.co/20l2rt4KFa
- Oct 20, 202612x their median
🚨🎙️ | Erik ten Hag on Scott McTominay: “In Ibiza, we agreed. I said, ‘No selling Scott McTominay’. “We would go aligned in the transfer window. I make an argument, a reason: we don’t have scoring abilities. Scott brings scoring abilities and great mentality. “He has United in all his veins. So when they bring up the subject, ‘No’. “And in the end they sold him. I got, of course, very embarrassed and disappointed.” [@lauriewhitwell]
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 149 interactions against 169K followers, an engagement rate of 0.088%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 0.588% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 15.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36K interactions, about 241x its own typical post.
- What is Kyama ⚽'s engagement rate on X?
- Kyama ⚽ (@ElijahKyama_) has an engagement rate of 0.088%, based on the median interactions across 35 original posts from the last 30 days against 168,814 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.088%, Kyama ⚽ sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @ElijahKyama_ have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @ElijahKyama_ post?
- Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.5 posts per day across the measured window.