Back to @ElVallenato's profile

ElVallenato.com engagement report

@ElVallenato - 135K followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.04%
of 135K followers
Per impression
1.19%
4.5K views on a typical post
Reach
3.34%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
54
interactions (median)
Saved
0.088%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.37/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 54 interactions against 135K followers, an engagement rate of 0.04%. Posts are seen about 4.5K times each, and 1.19% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 27x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.04%, ElVallenato.com sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,186 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,186 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,400 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 1869 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 22, 202427x their median

    Último vídeo del maestro Omar Geles https://t.co/2Yn07C9sWS

    1.2K207251868K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 2026

    Con la activación de las medidas transitorias de la CREG ante El Niño 2026–2027, la referencia térmica vigente es de 95 GWh/día La resolución no establece una única referencia para la generación térmica. Ordena al Centro Nacional de Despacho (CND) programar, como mínimo, la generación térmica asociada (ISO-GT) al nivel de los embalses. Durante la primera quincena de septiembre, esta curva corresponde a ISO-GT 95, lo que implica una generación térmica de referencia de 95 GWh/día. En la primera semana de aplicación, del 7 al 13 de septiembre, esta referencia solo se superó el 8 de septiembre, con 95,3 GWh. El promedio fue de 89,0 GWh/día, equivalente al 93,7 % de la referencia, con un déficit promedio de 6,0 GWh/día. Según el balance de XM, el 8 de septiembre fue el único día en el que se cumplió la referencia, con una generación real de 95,26 GWh. El gas natural fue el principal combustible, con una generación entre 45,7 y 55,5 GWh/día. La generación a carbón disminuyó de 31,4 a 26,6 GWh/día, mientras que el ACPM cubrió parte de la brecha y alcanzó 12,1 GWh el 10 de septiembre. La meta de generación térmica contribuye a reducir el riesgo de racionamiento, pero no basta por sí sola. Debe complementarse con: (i) el programa de ahorro e incentivos de la CREG 101 120, ajustado por la CREG 101 126; (ii) mecanismos de respuesta de la demanda (CREG 101 111); (iii) la entrega transitoria de excedentes de autogeneración y cogeneración (CREG 101 114); (iv) el aplazamiento o la reprogramación de mantenimientos simultáneos en plantas críticas, como Chivor y Guavio; (v) el aseguramiento del suministro de gas natural y ACPM, junto con la flexibilidad de las plantas dual-fuel; y (vi) la aceleración de los 4.475 MW previstos para entrar en operación en 2026, de los cuales hasta ahora han ingresado 1.027 MW.nto de mantenimientos, entre otras medidas.

    3414514.5K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 54 interactions against 135K followers, an engagement rate of 0.04%. Posts are seen about 4.5K times each, and 1.19% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 27x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is ElVallenato.com's engagement rate on X?
ElVallenato.com (@ElVallenato) has an engagement rate of 0.04%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 135,470 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.04%, ElVallenato.com sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,186 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ElVallenato have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @ElVallenato post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going