Defi Rocketeer engagement report
@Defi_Rocketeer - 163K followers on X
Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 187 interactions against 163K followers, an engagement rate of 0.114%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.8K times each, and 1.90% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.02% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.9K interactions, about 10.0x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #canton, #ondo.
Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026. Recurring tags: #canton, #ondo.
Compared with accounts its own size
Defi Rocketeer's engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 61% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.114%, Defi Rocketeer sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,805 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.697% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 83.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 25% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 25% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 1471 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 13, 202610.0x their median
Whitelist is open. 4,000 seats. Link: https://t.co/KHHGUorV0h Traded on Hyperliquid or played Papertrade? You may already qualify. 1,500 seats each. First come, first served. How to join: 1. Follow @livetrade_gg 2. Like + repost 3. Sign up on the site Whitelisted players get 2 hours of early access. Closes 17 Oct. Link in the next post 👇
- Sep 19, 20265.0x their median
Garrett Jin (@GarrettBullish), the largest $ZEC short, currently holds 202,078 $ZEC ($312.8M). He withdrew the 202,078 $ZEC from #Binance 9 months ago when the price was $437. He's now sitting on a $224.5M unrealized profit on $ZEC spot! https://t.co/YxwpSRLuus https://t.co/6sIffxj2Hl
- Sep 11, 20262.3x their median
Arc mainnet opens in a week and I know half of you are too deep in RH trenches rn to even bother doing homework on the next chain lol. As usual, CT gonna hunt the first cat, first NFT mint, and probably an $ARC airdrop before understanding what Circle is actually launching here. The chain already has 100+ institutional/ecosystem builders inside private mainnet before public launch. Circle is bringing App Kits, Onramp, CCTP v3, cirBTC, EURC, Arc Studio and Agent Stack into the launch surface. Aave, Aerodrome, Morpho, Uniswap + liquidity names like FalconX, Galaxy, GSR, Keyrock and XFX are also already attached to the ecosystem. But ik nobody came here to read institutional infra porn, you want the early trenches. 1/ Launchpad @Lolpad_ : stock-pair × meme pad, launch against USDC or NVDA/GOOGL, curve then locked Uni v4. @Flutchdotfun : multichain launch infra bundling token creation, swaps, bridges, LP locks + anti-snipe. @actfunxyz : social-first Arc launchpad mixing meme mining, bonding curves, livestreams + NFTs. @bozodotfun : skips bonding curves entirely and launches tokens straight into locked Uni v4 pools. @warponarc : bonding-curve pad + terminal, using Circle CCTP intents to let users buy Arc tokens directly with USDC from other chains. @minarafun : launching directly into locked v4 liquidity with a 3-second anti-snipe tax. @akadotfun : MemeFi launchpad where its 2% trading fee funds creators, holders, referrals + an RWA treasury buying tokenized stocks. @Fliptfun : curve launchpad where early buyers stay bonded as LPs after graduation and earn USDC fees. 2/ DEX - Terminal @Sidoorxyz : Arc terminal for bridge, launch, trade, with queued USDC + auto-snipe. @TowerExchange : DEX agg with its own AMM + StableFX rails underneath. @UnitFlowFinance : full-stack DeFi hub combining AMM, lending, bridging and token launches. @synthra_finance : DEX with spot + concentrated liquidity + perps. @TollyLabs : launchpad + intel terminal combining permanently locked USDC pools. @ArcDEXScan : indexing pools across the ecosystem with charts, swaps + portfolio tracking. 3/ NFT @Orixaxyz : NFT marketplace + launchpad with Orixians as its genesis collection. @ArclingsNFT : 6,283 fully onchain 1-bit PFPs. @Arcins__ : 10k cheap sprite PFPs. @Arc_Punks : 10k CryptoPunks fork that minted on early Arc. @KyneraOnArc : original-character Genesis Kynari PFPs deployed during private mainnet beta. @Arcadiansnft_ : 5k sci-fi PFPs. 4/ Others @AIsaOneHQ : AI agent infra giving agents one API for 100+ models/tools with per-call USDC payments via x402 + Circle Gateway. @flezpay : African retail POS/payments app bringing USDC settlement to 1,000+ merchants. @landsonarc : early virtual land NFT on Arc with mint teasers. I’m aligned with the new trenches bro.
- Oct 7, 20261.8x their median
DTCC’s $114T custody base makes @CantonNetwork impossible to fade to be clear, that figure is DTC’s total custody base. It is not capital already deployed on #Canton, and DTCC is pursuing multiple networks. What caught my attention was the actual activity: DTCC’s July production trades included collateral pledges, securities lending, Treasury repo and margin workflows. Those are services institutions already use and pay for. From a macro perspective, i care about funding costs and liquidity. If a firm can finance securities faster or deliver collateral when it needs to meet margin, tokenization has a measurable financial use. There’re evidences that make Canton too big to ignore: – @Broadridge DLR: $351B average daily repo volume; $7.4T monthly volume. – @The_DTCC: production transactions with 30+ participating firms. – @Rho_Labs: reported trading history, its website reports $60B+ cumulative trading volume. – Network activity: growth still needs proof, CCView reports 35M transactions, −0.7% MoM, and 456,173 active parties, −1.7% MoM. Three Canton projects I’m looking at: → Broadridge DLR - repo financing DLR runs on Canton and processed $351B in average daily repo transactions in August. I find this compelling because the usage is already there. That number is transaction volume, though, so i wouldn’t treat it as TVL or app revenue. → @AlpendHQ - native lending Its live markets support CC, USDCx and CBTC. I’m curious whether it can build sustained borrowing demand and eventually support more institutional collateral. Its current asset list gives me a concrete starting point; access to DTC securities still needs to be demonstrated. → Rho - funding-rate markets Rho offers funding-rate futures and uses Canton for private settlement records. I like the financing angle: traders can hedge variable funding costs. I want to see repeat demand for that service as onchain trading grows. I’m interested in #Canton because these products address specific financial needs. My next checks are collateral eligibility, repeat counterparties, outstanding loans and fees earned. and if i’m evaluating a token, i need to see how those fees reach holders. The custody headline gets my attention. Actual financing activity is what would build my conviction. DYOR.
- Oct 20, 20261.7x their median
USDC rewards are getting an upgrade. Starting October 26, the weekly USDC rewards program will change to better reward both makers and takers. Instead of a single pool, there will be three dedicated pools: 1. Maker pool: Rewards resting liquidity within 25 bps of the mid price. 80% of the maker pool goes to liquidity posted from mid to 5 bps, 15% to 6–10 bps, and 5% to 11–25 bps. 2. Taker pool: Similar to the existing USDC rewards program, the taker pool will primarily reward trading volume and open interest. 3. Trading activity pool: This pool is a bonus pool. The trading activity rewarded will change periodically and may not be available every week. The first week from the 26th will reward spot trading of OpenAI Private Market Note (OPAIPon). The updated program will run through the end of the year and continue after that unless otherwise stated. More details coming soon.
- Sep 14, 20261.7x their median
how has Uniswap restructured $UNI’s value accrual mechanism? $UNI didn’t go from governance token to dividend token. @Uniswap rebuilt the entire value accrual path so protocol usage can remove $UNI from supply without ever paying holders cash. That distinction matters a lot. Because for almost 5 years Uniswap was one of the biggest fee machines in crypto while $UNI captured basically none of it. Now part of the swap fees from v2/v3/selected v4 pools + net Unichain sequencer fees are collected into TokenJar. TokenJar holds the actual assets collected from trading. ETH, stables, whatever tokens the pools generated. Anyone can take those assets out, but to do it they need to pay $UNI into Firepit where that UNI is permanently burned. So Uniswap itself is not market buying $UNI. Instead searchers decide when the assets sitting inside TokenJar are worth more than the $UNI + gas needed to claim them. Usage creates fee inventory → fee inventory creates an economic reason to acquire/burn UNI → supply disappears. Tbh the mechanism looked pretty mid during the first half of 2026. Only ~$28.2M became protocol revenue from $357.6B volume across Jan–Jul 2026. Not exactly Hyperliquid-level token economics. But the important thing is coverage was still rolling out. – daily protocol revenue went from $114K pre-v4 flip to $325K after it. – Robinhood contributed $170K on one post-flip day. – latest 30d protocol revenue is ~$10.3M, up ~134% over the period. That’s ~$124M annualized versus the ~$26–35M annualized numbers at the beginning of the year. What actually printed: – 111.7M $UNI gone, 888.3M remaining. – 11.7M of that is actual Firepit, the rest is the 100M gesture. – L90D / L180D annualized ~$97.6M / $75.3M. – annualized burn cleared $250M on Sep 8, heavily driven by RH. Currently the pipe is finally large enough to matter versus a ~$4B mcap, and the Firepit run-rate now outruns the 20M UNI/year Labs budget. I think design quality is high. They solved the constraint that killed every prior vote by not paying holders, burning float, wrapping the DAO, and making Labs a vendor. Legally, it’s probably the constrained optimum for a US-touched major. Respect the engineering. But magnitude is still mid. If we want this to look like HYPE economics, we’ll be waiting a long time unless they turn PFDA / UniswapX / the rest of v4 into real take. DYOR.
- Oct 22, 2026
$PYTH - the last unlock might be more bullish than bearish Even i bullish on @PythNetwork RWA perps dominance and the $11.5M ARR. I still need to dig into what happens when the final piece of supply hits the market. Rn, 78.75% of the 10B max supply is already circulating (~7.875B). The final major cliff still sits locked: 2.125B PYTH unlocks in May 2027. That’s ~27% of today’s circulating supply, or about $167 –170M at current prices. After this unlock, PYTH reaches 100% circulation. Fully diluted valuation at today’s price is still under $800M. But i think most of the unlock isn’t pure sell pressure: – ~53% (~1.125B) goes to Eco Growth. If used for grants, integrations and incentives, this can actually speed up expansion rather than just hit the market. – Publisher Rewards and Protocol Development make up another large portion. – Private Sales is only ~12% (~250M). This is the slice most likely to create real sell pressure, and it’s relatively small. Studying, the past unlocks (May 2024, 2025, 2026) were similar in size. Price usually weakened into or around the events, but the market often priced a good chunk of the dilution in advance. The day-of dump wasn’t always as severe as the circulating increase suggested. The May 2026 unlock left the token near multi-year lows before it recovered with broader market strength and the 100% Rule narrative. On the demand side, the DAO is currently buying ~$550–575k of PYTH per month under the 100% Rule. That’s real ongoing demand, but it’s still small compared to a $160M+ unlock. The bigger question is whether ARR keeps growing so the buybacks can scale over time while the ecosystem expands. ✨ Bull case into and thru May 2027 RWA volume and ARR continue to grow. Once the final unlock is absorbed and the token is fully circulating, the main supply overhang is gone. With strong metrics and steady buybacks, this looks more bullish than bearish to me. ✨ Bear case ARR growth slows down, more of the unlocked tokens (especially Private Sales) get sold into strength, and the market continues to price in the new supply until it’s fully absorbed. in that scenario the price can stay weak even if the business itself keeps improving. However, even at full circulation PYTH’s FDV at current prices is still under $800M. Chainlink is around $9.3 -9.6B. Pyth already has meaningful share of RWA perp pricing and actual product revenue, yet it trades at a fraction of LINK. Adoption is already visible in the metrics. i still pretty bullish on $Pyth even the massive unlock coming. NFA, just my own read. DYOR!
- Oct 16, 2026
I think the better opportunity on @CantonNetwork sits in the app layer, not just in $CC Here’s how the loop works. Every time someone uses the network, they burn $CC to pay for Global Synchronizer traffic. The fee is set in dollars, but it is paid by burning $CC. The network then mints new $CC and distributes it as rewards. A large and growing share of those rewards goes to the apps that generate the traffic. → The more real activity an app creates, the more $CC it can earn. → Idle tokenized assets create almost no traffic, so they earn almost nothing. → Collateral that gets borrowed and reused creates repeated transactions, interest, and traffic. Those apps capture more of the rewards. Burn helps $CC, but a meaningful part of the value flows to the apps that actually put collateral to work. Here are some of notable projects shipping $CC value: 1/ @AlpendHQ - native money market – Built natively for Canton’s selective disclosure model so individual positions stay private. Access is permissioned; integrated with Loop Wallet and BitSafe; Halborn-audited. – Live isolated markets for CC, USDCx, and CBTC. Each asset has its own pool and parameters. – ~$2.15M available TVL and ~$631k active loans. Total supplied is roughly $2.78M, which puts overall utilization around 22–23%. – Alpend ONE (coming) is a CC-backed debt instrument geared to $1, intended to unlock dollar liquidity without selling the underlying CC. 2/ @Broadridge DLR - the repo platform running on Canton – $7.5T in repo volume in sep 2026 with an average daily of ~$359B. – Live on Canton since 2023, handling intraday and cross-border repo while expanding collateral eligibility from U.S. Treasuries toward G7 securities, and now sitting inside the broader DLX platform. – The scale demonstrates that institutions are already moving real financing and collateral workflows onto Canton rails. – Large notional volume still needs to be mapped to actual Global Synchronizer traffic and the resulting burn versus rewards minted. 3/ @Cantex_io and @temple_ny - liquidity layer – Cantex has crossed $300M cumulative volume (up roughly $100M since its August). It offers atomic, self-custodial swaps with Canton’s privacy model. – Temple has passed $1B cumulative volume as the first native institutional CLOB on Canton, with daily volumes recently in the $20M+ range. – Collateral needs liquid markets and clear prices before it can be used at scale. Cantex and Temple provide that foundation for lending protocols. – Temple previously reported crossing 1B CC burned in Sep. 4/ Others that still forming – @Kintsu has opened a private beta (currently on testnet) with isolated, curator-driven markets, curated vaults, and CC staking. – @Canborsa_DEX is testing a lending prototype on DevNet that lets users supply USDCx and borrow against CC or CBTC. It already uses CC as collateral for its RWA perps. – @Rho_Labs offers funding-rate markets that use Canton for private settlement records while executing elsewhere.
- Oct 21, 2026
NEW: Pre-IPO OpenAI perp just went live. Go leveraged long or short the pre-IPO perp on the company behind ChatGPT, the fastest app ever to reach 1 billion monthly users. Trade now → https://t.co/aM7NhEO1Qx https://t.co/jvGMNrhcNq
- Sep 15, 2026
the "next PONS" on @arc may not be the biggest name before mainnet before mainnet, what I can mainly evaluate is still the product, how liquidity is launched, founder activity, and the first signs of traction. but #Arc is changing too fast for me to treat any current ranking as a final conclusion. The group i’m digging into the most right now: >> @liftdotfun : $DEPEG became the first token to graduate on the pad. The team has kept shipping pretty consistently before mainnet, from the trading UI to integrations and flows for early users. >> @minarafun : notable for its Uniswap V4-based launch approach; I want to see how this model performs once real liquidity starts flowing into Arc. >> @TradePools : still on my shortlist, but mainnet will be when there’s more data to evaluate it more clearly. >> @akadotfun : a different MemeFi direction compared with most pure launchpads, so i’m keeping it on the radar to see whether this narrative can attract users. >> @Arguspad : already had activity before mainnet, so this is one of the names I want to keep tracking once real volume starts showing up. >> @TollyLabs : a fairly different model that skips the bonding curve and sends tokens straight into locked USDC liquidity, currently one of the designs i find most interesting. i’m still not sure which name will be the winner among them. after mainnet, this ranking will start being decided by things that are harder to fake: - whether liquidity stays. - whether volume holds up. - whether users come back. - whether new launches keep coming. - whether teams keep shipping fast after the hype cools down. i’ll keep updating this shortlist. The Arc launchpad war is just getting started.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 187 interactions against 163K followers, an engagement rate of 0.114%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.8K times each, and 1.90% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.02% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.9K interactions, about 10.0x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #canton, #ondo.
- What is Defi Rocketeer's engagement rate on X?
- Defi Rocketeer (@Defi_Rocketeer) has an engagement rate of 0.114%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 163,427 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.114%, Defi Rocketeer sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,805 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Defi_Rocketeer have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Defi_Rocketeer post?
- Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.3 posts per day across the measured window.