Back to @DanielRiolo's profile

Daniel Riolo engagement report

@DanielRiolo - 621K followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.32%
of 621K followers
Per impression
1.44%
138K views on a typical post
Reach
22.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.018%
25 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.87/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 2.0K interactions against 621K followers, an engagement rate of 0.32%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 138K times each, and 1.44% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 22.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 9% carry an image or video and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 103K interactions, about 52x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #dopoboulogne, #médias.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026. Recurring tags: #dopoboulogne, #médias.

Compared with accounts its own size

Daniel Riolo's engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 57% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.32%, Daniel Riolo sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,349 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.696%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.696%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,349 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,452 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.696%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video9% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link18% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 9% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 18% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 167 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 9, 202652x their median

    🚨 Paolo Maldini: “We were extremely close to getting Pep Guardiola as new Italy head coach”. “Pep was gonna accept same salary as previous coach and also started thinking about the players and the potential line up…”, told Corriere. “After few days, Pep decided to reject as he was tired and he wants to spend some time with his family… we respect that”.

    98K4.2K6341955.8M viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 20262.9x their median

    Donc Deschamps parle d’atmosphère irrespirable ? Faux tt le monde était derrière les Bleus. Et il quitte son poste limite forcé ? Mais pardon il Voulait le poste à vie ? C’est privatisé ? incroyable decla ! Du coup, allez du balai on t’a assez vu ! 14 ans !!!!!!!

    4.1K4851.2K124651K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20262.2x their median

    Les haters de Mbappé sur X .. ils ont encore plus la haine qd il marque. On dirait des pitbull ces bouffons. Profitez et ouvrez le champagne .. il est blessé ! Réjouissez vous. Un hater reste d’abord une raclure …

    2.7K377999225442K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.0x their median

    Finalement dans cette histoire Rennes s’est fait avoir… le club n’aurait jamais dû accepter de jouer la J1 à domicile. Faut pas jouer au plus malin avec le king du foot fr… quand on contrôle l’UEFA , bientôt la fifa c’est pas un paillasson de L1 qui va nous emmerder qd même

    3.1K337470101347K viewsView on X
  • Jul 18, 20261.7x their median

    Heu ok on s’en fout du match tout ça … mais de là à être grotesque, on n’est pas obligé non ? C’est humiliant la … faut bouger un peu quand même …

    2.9K1712225190K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 2026

    Donc Zidane a dit : « Kylian est mon capitaine ! Ça c’est clair »… merde alors ! il n’est pas au courant Zidane que personne aime Mbappé et qu’il fout le bordel partout ? L’armée des soldats du PSG n’a pas réussi à le convaincre ? Bah merde alors.

    1.9K167702104343K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 2026

    Cette équipe du Real est absolument grotesque… elle se couche devant un remplaçant du PSG et un Jo David qu’on avait oublié… ridicule !

    1.9K12325016135K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 2026

    De Zerbi faut qu’il aille se reposer très loin . Qu’il arrête tout. Il a eu bcp de moyens à Marseille et est devenu fou. Il a eu tt ce qu’il voulait à Tottenham et propose une équipe catastrophique….

    2.0K14015215138K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 2026

    La ligue 1 n’a pas repris que le cirque des cartons rouges est déjà en place … mais pourquoi ne pas copier l’arbitrage excellent du mondial ??

    1.7K13234651246K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 2026

    L’armée numérique psg en action pour flinguer Barcola… j’ai envie de défendre Bambi comme au premier jour !! 😘 Ça serait bien qu’un jour ces méthodes détestables cessent … mais bon ..

    1.3K103631173425K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#dopoboulogne#médias

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.0K interactions against 621K followers, an engagement rate of 0.32%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 138K times each, and 1.44% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 22.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 9% carry an image or video and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 103K interactions, about 52x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #dopoboulogne, #médias.

What is Daniel Riolo's engagement rate on X?
Daniel Riolo (@DanielRiolo) has an engagement rate of 0.32%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 620,979 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.32%, Daniel Riolo sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,349 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DanielRiolo have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @DanielRiolo post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going