CrediBULL Crypto engagement report
@CredibleCrypto - 481K followers on X
Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 686 interactions against 481K followers, an engagement rate of 0.143%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 61K times each, and 1.12% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.5K interactions, about 4.8x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #blackbox, #hermes.
Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026. Recurring tags: #blackbox, #hermes.
Compared with accounts its own size
CrediBULL Crypto's engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 50% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.143%, CrediBULL Crypto sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.697% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.8% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 65% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 5% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 65% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 402 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Mar 22, 20254.8x their median
$CRV https://t.co/dvM0EtwWxp
- Oct 21, 20262.6x their median
Attention all Curvers and Convexers, this is your captain speaking. Ladies and llamas, as we prepare for takeoff, please ensure your seatbelts are securely fastened, your seatbacks and tray tables are in their full upright and locked positions, and all carry-on luggage is securely stowed either in the overhead bins or completely underneath the seat in front of you. All electronic devices must now be switched to moon mode. Lightly carbonated beverages and snacks will be served once we have reached cruising altitude. Please enjoy the flight and thank you for flying Credi-Curve airlines 🫡 $CRV 🤝 $CVX
- Aug 22, 20262.5x their median
Arguably the most important update on crypto I've made in years. The move that we saw over the last 48 hours has ignited a rally that has been 5+ years in the making. This is what you've been waiting for. Enjoy. https://t.co/pRYNHODYmH https://t.co/XhBtvjep4N
- Sep 15, 20262.3x their median
Don't miss the forest for the trees. Bottom on $BTC is somewhere between where we are now and about 10% lower before a 200+% rally to the upside. If you want more context and/or want to hear the logic and rationale behind this statement I explained it all in depth in my last Youtube video which you can watch here: https://t.co/CaBepyzVwx
- Oct 16, 20262.3x their median
I keep getting the question- how long until $CRV breaks $1? So I made a video update to discuss recent PA as well as share my thoughts on that question. If you learned something from this free content, likes/shares are appreciated. Enjoy. https://t.co/qgTwuWQtJ7
- Sep 19, 20262.3x their median
First it was $BTC, then it was $ETH, then it was $XRP, then it was $ZEC, So dust off those bags and see who's left, the old guard's back, so who's up next? $LTC, the silver to the gold, $XLM and $ADA, the stories of old, $DOGE off the leash, $LINK off the chain, $XMR creeping up quietly again. They called them dinosaurs, they left them for dead, "Go chase the shiny new thing instead!" But after the years of sideways and pain, the OGs are beginning to run the show again. So laugh at the fossils, go on, have your fun, the old guard's not finished, they've only just begun...
- Sep 3, 20262.1x their median
Quick little 15 minute video update on low timeframe price action- I cover bitcoin:native, ethereum:0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52 and $CVX. Likes/shares appreciated. Enjoy! https://t.co/sl3QA0ELrZ
- Aug 23, 20261.7x their median
Nice little range forming on bitcoin:native here... https://t.co/oWASObFxn3
- Sep 2, 20261.7x their median
all together now fam ethereum:0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52 https://t.co/8ygKbZdo55
- Sep 20, 20261.7x their median
Might be time for a new Youtube video soon...
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 686 interactions against 481K followers, an engagement rate of 0.143%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 61K times each, and 1.12% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.5K interactions, about 4.8x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #blackbox, #hermes.
- What is CrediBULL Crypto's engagement rate on X?
- CrediBULL Crypto (@CredibleCrypto) has an engagement rate of 0.143%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 481,406 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.143%, CrediBULL Crypto sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @CredibleCrypto have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @CredibleCrypto post?
- Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.23 posts per day across the measured window.