Back to @ChrisVannini's profile

Chris Vannini engagement report

@ChrisVannini - 68K followers on X

Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.039%
of 68K followers
Per impression
0.516%
5.0K views on a typical post
Reach
7.56%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
26
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.17/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 26 interactions against 68K followers, an engagement rate of 0.039%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.0K times each, and 0.516% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 14% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 423x its own typical post.

Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026. Recurring tag: #hokies.

Compared with accounts its own size

Chris Vannini's engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 23% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.039%, Chris Vannini sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,472 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.699%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,472 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,408 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.699%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video14% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link7% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 14% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 94 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 19, 2026423x their median

    Colorado players talking trash about Northwestern’s temporary stadium ahead of this evening’s game: “This place f*cking sucks” “Sh*t sounds like a f*cking library.” https://t.co/dU07Kr4YaR

    9.1K2728657065.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 2026367x their median

    Time to find out who the real UT is 😏 We'll see you in Knoxville on Saturday for a showdown between Texas and Tennessee! 🔥 https://t.co/WiD1PRelNR

    7.6K1.3K341267738K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 202389x their median

    20 years ago, ESPN aired Playmakers, a scripted drama about a football team with drug issues, domestic violence and homophobia. It was a massive hit, but the NFL hated it, so it was canceled. Here's the definitive story of what happened to Playmakers: https://t.co/4TC1ihZkFZ https://t.co/QFXHs3nBQV

    1.7K343741911.5M viewsView on X
  • Jan 6, 202636x their median

    West Virginia has added QB Michael Hawkins Jr. and RB Cam Cook in the past two days. RichRod might be cooking. https://t.co/E7N03jpatD

    84755211189K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202621x their median

    Still like what I see from Michigan State through three games. They're playing hard and smart. Notre Dame's got better players and just wore MSU down, but it was a real battle inside. Next week vs. Nebraska will be the test of where this season can go.

    5061810017K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202613x their median

    Oklahoma's in a battle with New Mexico and John Mateer's thrown 2 INTs. Believe in Jason Eck. https://t.co/X2pCirU1B9

    290229816K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202611x their median

    Pat Fitzgerald hiring Iowa special teams coordinator LeVar Woods to Michigan State is already paying huge dividends. Good CFB stuff from @alex_kirshner here: https://t.co/k19p6sPSZY https://t.co/uD2bcvMKVj

    265233749K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20269.1x their median

    Zero playoff talk in all the build-up for top-10 Ole Miss-LSU. Just hatred. This is what it's really all about.

    21617127.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20268.5x their median

    They're playing Callin' Baton Rouge at Ole Miss in celebration.

    20214327.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20264.0x their median

    🐶 New Puppy Thread: Our Zora had a litter of seven Icelandic Sheepdog pups this week. Everyone's doing very well and being very cute. Little potato babies. https://t.co/pskejSzUL9

    9309120K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#hokies

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 26 interactions against 68K followers, an engagement rate of 0.039%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.0K times each, and 0.516% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 14% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 423x its own typical post.

What is Chris Vannini's engagement rate on X?
Chris Vannini (@ChrisVannini) has an engagement rate of 0.039%, based on the median interactions across 42 original posts from the last 30 days against 67,699 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.039%, Chris Vannini sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,472 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ChrisVannini have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ChrisVannini post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going