Back to @Chime's profile

Chime engagement report

@Chime - 273K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.021%
of 273K followers
Per impression
0.605%
9.6K views on a typical post
Reach
3.51%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
58
interactions (median)
Saved
0.01%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.53/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 58 interactions against 273K followers, an engagement rate of 0.021%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 33% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.6K times each, and 0.605% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 459x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026. Recurring tag: #chimepartner.

Compared with accounts its own size

Chime's engagement rate beats 33% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 30% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.021%, Chime sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,146 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.694%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,146 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,455 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.694%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 85 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 15, 2026459x their median

    🧊 https://t.co/6uvp57y1aC

    19K1.9K13884211K viewsView on X
  • Jun 3, 202676x their median

    You know what time it is 👀 #WhyIChime! Take a spin and tell us why you Chime for a shot at $1,000 💰 Take a spin and tell us why you Chime for a shot at $1,000 💰 Here’s how: 1️⃣ Comment why you love Chime & include #WhyIChime 2️⃣ Drop your $ChimeSign 3️⃣ Follow @Chime • • • No purch nec. Void where prohibited. Ends 6/4. For T&C + entry methods, https://t.co/4hpy9ZsIrJ. #WhyIChime®

    1.1K3482.0K65105K viewsView on X
  • May 12, 202635x their median

    Have no fear, the fees are NOT here https://t.co/6F4hjBu6yf

    1.3K195914140K viewsView on X
  • May 18, 202628x their median

    Be honest, are the jorts worth it? We think yes 👀 https://t.co/38dx1mYYkz

    1.1K156845108K viewsView on X
  • May 11, 202627x their median

    This always happens… https://t.co/4zCHZ2muQI

    1.0K17971176K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20268.5x their median

    New York shaped her. Every stop along the way strengthened her. Now Emily Engstler is helping build something new in Portland. Emily opens up about the road that brought her here on the latest WSLAM digital cover. https://t.co/H3MGho4CeZ

    376551450174K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20268.0x their median

    LA prices vs. @Sonny7 in Worth It or Return It #chimepartner https://t.co/lzHhZy3JNQ

    32112021315K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20266.8x their median

    Every step forward tells a story. Portland, it's time. Monday, August 10 at 11 AM EST. https://t.co/Fs0B0tAQwP

    350221012110K viewsView on X
  • Jun 5, 20268.3x their median

    Seven years of Mavs x Chime. An unforgettable run defined by positive impact for fans and local communities, rooted in financial empowerment. Together, @Chime and @dallasmavs built something that really mattered. As we turn the page, we're grateful for everything we accomplished together and will be cheering each other on for years to come! 💚💙 #MFFL

    305252429205K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20264.7x their median

    Money moves like this 💸 #chimepartner @djdiveny @julieertz @Sonny7 @LauraBiondo https://t.co/nlOHXLqrOs

    1846721212K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#chimepartner

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 58 interactions against 273K followers, an engagement rate of 0.021%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 33% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.6K times each, and 0.605% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 459x its own typical post.

What is Chime's engagement rate on X?
Chime (@Chime) has an engagement rate of 0.021%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 272,818 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.021%, Chime sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,146 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Chime have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 33% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Chime post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going