Back to @Chellaney's profile

Dr. Brahma Chellaney engagement report

@Chellaney - 313K followers on X

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.113%
of 313K followers
Per impression
2.13%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
5.31%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
354
interactions (median)
Saved
0.136%
22 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.17/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 354 interactions against 313K followers, an engagement rate of 0.113%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 2.13% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 43% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.9K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026. Recurring tag: #brics.

Compared with accounts its own size

Dr. Brahma Chellaney's engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 64% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.113%, Dr. Brahma Chellaney sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,186 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,186 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,400 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video4% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link43% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 4% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 43% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 854 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 26, 202614x their median

    The Himalayas are the world’s most seismically active major mountain range, with a record of triggering devastating earthquakes. How even a moderate seismic event can trigger massive cascading effects was illustrated today when a magnitude 4.4 quake along the Tibet-Nepal border unleashed a disaster, with flash floods washing away Nepali villages. This will renew global attention on China's folly in persisting with the construction of the world's largest dam in the middle of the Himalayan seismic zone. The project, located next to the Indo-Tibetan border, is a water bomb in the making, which could drown India's northeast and wreak havoc farther downstream in Bangladesh.

    4.0K7799544141K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202614x their median

    The flood tragedy in Nepal and Tibet ought to focus global attention on the super-dam China is building in another section of the Himalayas, despite its own scientists in June warning of serious geological hazards at the construction site. Shrouded in secrecy, the unparalleled dam is rising within the Himalayan seismic belt, one of Earth’s most earthquake-prone regions. The dam's gigantic reservoir could itself induce earthquakes by intensifying geological stresses. My column: https://t.co/tg3FwaRf6j

    3.2K1.4K16291183K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20266.0x their median

    Shortly after India's Operation Sindoor ended in just three and a half days in May 2025, satellite images emerged showing smoke and impact marks at the Kirana Hills, a site widely believed to house Pakistan's nuclear-weapons infrastructure and storage facilities. Speaking today, India's then Chief of Defence Staff, General Anil Chauhan, clarified that any impact at Kirana Hills was entirely unintentional, stating that the autonomous loitering munitions (kamikaze drones) used to target radar installations at the nearby Sargodha airbase, about 10 km away, self-destructed after exhausting their two-hour battery life. By attributing the Kirana Hills impact to drone mechanics rather than a deliberate strike, Chauhan reinforced India's position that Operation Sindoor targeted only terrorist infrastructure and conventional military assets, not Pakistan's nuclear facilities. It remains unclear, however, what prompted him to issue this clarification more than 15 months after the operation.

    1.8K1958227211K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20265.4x their median

    American Matthew Aaron VanDyke, a veteran of covert wars in the Middle East and Ukraine, was arrested in India in March alongside six military-trained drone specialists from Ukraine. Indian authorities allege the group, part of a larger international network, smuggled drones into India and then into Myanmar. After returning from Myanmar, the seven were arrested under India's stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) for alleged terrorist conspiracy. VanDyke's case has since been raised with New Delhi by U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio. In a preliminary chargesheet filed this week, however, India's National Investigation Agency indicted the seven under the Immigration and Foreigners Act, not the UAPA, telling the court that its wider investigation into the alleged cross-border drone supplies and terrorist conspiracy remains ongoing. Earlier, after VanDyke began a liquid-only hunger strike, saying he could not stomach the prison's Indian-style food, a New Delhi court — without objection from the prosecution — approved his request for a special Western-style diet in jail. It is difficult to imagine an Indian jailed in the U.S. on terrorist-conspiracy charges receiving a court-approved special Indian diet as readily. The New Delhi court even ordered the jail authorities to assign a prison cook to take care of VanDyke's dietary needs.

    1.4K415844947K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20265.1x their median

    Brazilian President Lula da Silva's absence at the BRICS Summit in New Delhi has been conspicuous as he is the sole sitting leader from the original 2009 BRIC quartet still in office. Like Brazil, two newer BRICS members, the UAE and Saudi Arabia, sent their foreign ministers instead to the summit. Saudi Arabia's decision isn't a surprise: It continues its strategy of calculated ambiguity on BRICS, neither completing the formal accession procedures nor explicitly declaring full membership but instead claiming to participate as an "invited guest."

    1.5K1856419160K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20264.8x their median

    As it did during the Wuhan-originating COVID-19 outbreak, China is censoring information about the Nepal–Tibet flood disaster, raising serious concerns for humanitarian response, the safety of stranded or missing people, and public accountability. Such censorship, or tightly state-curated messaging, creates information vacuums that are often filled by rumors, speculation and panic. https://t.co/6Q73V25JVe

    1.1K4411111329K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20264.6x their median

    Upstream engineering, downstream disaster: The hidden factor in Nepal’s tragedy. My op-ed on how China’s upstream projects may have turned a natural disaster into a cascading catastrophe. According to Beijing's own statements over the past decade, it has expanded embankments, border facilities, highways and other civil works in the upstream river corridor, with significant construction concentrated along riverbanks. Its diversion weirs, intake structures, embankments and other hydrological modifications created localized bottlenecks in the Himalayan gorges. Realignment of riverbanks, concrete embankments and heavy border civil engineering (such as facilities around Gyirong Port) narrowed natural channels. Upstream hydraulic structures, including intake works, altered natural flow dynamics, creating secondary choke points that burst under pressure, exacerbating the sudden torrent downstream. https://t.co/6DxKgHgVOy

    1.0K4531283950K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20224.5x their median

    In its centennial anniversary issue released today, @ForeignAffairs has a special review section, "Books for the Century." My book, Water: Asia's New Battleground, has been named as one of the six essential Asia-Pacific books published over the century. https://t.co/kgk2WoIlHH

    1.3K2099111View on X
  • Oct 4, 20263.6x their median

    Oman is widely perceived as a moderate and forward-looking Muslim state that practices a more tolerant form of Islam known as Ibadism, distinct from both Sunni and Shia traditions. Historically, this has fostered a culture of religious tolerance, a largely violence-free society and a tradition of peace diplomacy, earning Oman the nickname “the Switzerland of the Middle East.” Hamam al-Hammami, the co-pilot of FlyDubai Flight 1073, was radicalized not in Oman but in Syria, where, with a Syrian mother and Omani father, he grew up amid the prolonged Western-supported civil war against the Assad regime. The covert campaign against Assad, which began during the Barack Obama presidency, became the CIA’s largest covert operation since its 1980s “jihad” against Soviet forces in Afghanistan — a campaign that helped give rise to Al Qaeda and figures such as Osama bin Laden. Co-pilot Hammami’s attempt to bring down Flight 1073 by attacking the captain with a crash ax is the latest example of how Western replacement of secular dictators (from Iraq and Libya to Syria) with more Islamist alternatives can come back to haunt international security. Even the 1979 “Islamic Revolution” in Iran had its roots in the CIA’s 1953 overthrow of Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh, a secular, democratically elected nationalist leader who famously nationalized Iran's oil industry, which had previously been controlled by the British Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (now BP).

    964248441647K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20263.3x their median

    Ironically, the latest evidence suggests that China's scientific establishment understands the dangers of building the unprecedented super-dam more clearly than its political leadership appears willing to acknowledge. Now that China’s own geologists have raised the alarm, Beijing must embrace transparency and accept transboundary responsibilities before a potential water bomb is fully assembled upstream. https://t.co/tg3FwaRf6j

    8662454310114K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#brics

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 354 interactions against 313K followers, an engagement rate of 0.113%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 2.13% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 43% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.9K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

What is Dr. Brahma Chellaney's engagement rate on X?
Dr. Brahma Chellaney (@Chellaney) has an engagement rate of 0.113%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 312,734 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.113%, Dr. Brahma Chellaney sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,186 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Chellaney have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Chellaney post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going