Back to @CNviolations's profile

Community Notes & Violations engagement report

@CNviolations - 1.2M followers on X

Measured over 512 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.012%
of 1.2M followers
Per impression
0.742%
19K views on a typical post
Reach
1.58%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
138
interactions (median)
Saved
0.059%
11 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
26.07/day
active 93% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 138 interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Measured over 512 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 0.742% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.58% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 26.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 512 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 640K interactions, about 4641x its own typical post.

Measured over 512 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026. Recurring tag: #breaking.

Compared with accounts its own size

Community Notes & Violations's engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 39% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.012%, Community Notes & Violations sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,004 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,390 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video99% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link2% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 99% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 93 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 13, 20264641x their median

    https://t.co/TIe1amthSy

    585K53K7331.2K6.5M viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20263303x their median

    https://t.co/ijjlvYpMeq

    421K33K8011.1K5.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20262785x their median

    Wife told me these wouldn’t fit. Little did she know I had trained for this moment for years. https://t.co/nAmEXQCaoJ

    363K20K54981512M viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20261337x their median

    leaving milk and cookies out for erika kirk tonight

    169K15K3392812.6M viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20261164x their median

    https://t.co/oIe6wJv9Gs

    154K6.2K3942503.3M viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20261116x their median

    "incorrect username or password" BITCH, WHICH ONE IS IT!!!!! https://t.co/6Bzyz2sCun

    140K14K101801.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20261073x their median

    Just had the creepiest scam ever happen 20 minutes ago. I got a call from my wife telling me she forgot her wallet and needed the credit card to pay for her gas. Except my wife was at home with me, and drives a Tesla. Same voice, bit... off, weird cadence but 100% sounded just like her. If she wasn't there, and it wasn't about gas I would have fallen for it. I entertained it for awhile to get more out of it, I was so confused. Must be some sort of voice deepfake. The responses were too fast for ai, I think it was a voice filter. I wish I had thought to record it. The future is about to get fucked. Warn your loved ones, do verbal passwords with your kids. Bit taken aback

    125K20K1.8K1.2K6.8M viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 2026723x their median

    Feminists in 2026: https://t.co/mpa2V8u4oe

    93K6.3K3431862.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 2026661x their median

    2025: Together. 2026: A reminder that life can change in ways we never expect. 💔🥺 https://t.co/donDpNQoy3

    88K2.5K5292009.1M viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 2026613x their median

    A girl was doing a live stream and her cat started reading the chat https://t.co/W6FcfZM1Li

    78K6.1K116149806K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#breaking

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 138 interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Measured over 512 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 0.742% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.58% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 26.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 512 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 640K interactions, about 4641x its own typical post.

What is Community Notes & Violations's engagement rate on X?
Community Notes & Violations (@CNviolations) has an engagement rate of 0.012%, based on the median interactions across 512 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,179,881 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.012%, Community Notes & Violations sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @CNviolations have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @CNviolations post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 26.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going