Back to @BrentDearmon's profile

Brent Dearmon engagement report

@BrentDearmon - 69K followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 18, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.114%
of 69K followers
Per impression
1.66%
4.7K views on a typical post
Reach
6.84%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
78
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.5/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 78 interactions against 69K followers, an engagement rate of 0.114%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 50% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.7K times each, and 1.66% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 174 interactions, about 2.2x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #poundthestone, #roarlions, #fcs.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 18, 2026. Recurring tags: #poundthestone, #roarlions, #fcs.

Compared with accounts its own size

Brent Dearmon's engagement rate beats 50% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 54% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.114%, Brent Dearmon sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,381 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.699%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,381 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,403 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.699%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video55% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link9% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 55% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 9% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 185 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 7, 20262.2x their median

    Our @PFN365 highest-graded FCS EDGE: Cayden Adkins, North Alabama: 95.2 Avery Howard, North Alabama: 93.7 Chris Bacon, Maine: 91.5 Marquese Avery, Rhode Island: 89.9 Koda Canady, Lamar: 86.7 Kelton Crisp, Austin Peay: 86.5 Kamore Harris, North Alabama: 85.8 Isaac Engle, Eastern Illinois: 85.3 Jackson Biser, Murray State: 85.3 Sani Tuala, Idaho State: 84.9 📸: @CaydenAdkins2

    1153751744K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026

    "I was dead because of my sins and because my sinful nature was not yet cut away. Then God made me alive with Christ, for he forgave all my sins. He canceled the record of the charges against me and took it away by nailing it to the cross." #PoundTheStone 🪨🔨

    948502.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026

    Highest-graded FCS Defensive Lines: Eastern Washington: 96.4 Villanova: 92.1 Northern Iowa: 1.9 Youngstown State: 89.9 San Diego: 89.5 Alabama A&M: 89.1 Stony Brook: 88.1 North Alabama: 86.6 Duquesne: 86.1 Southern Illinois: 85.5 Incarnate Word: 85.5 West Florida: 85.2 SE Missouri State: 84.9 North Dakota: 84.2 Richmond: 84.0 📸: @EWUFootball

    68203824K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 2026

    Hotel Game Time before meetings. @spotitgame @UNOMobileGame @dominoes @JENGA #PoundTheStone 🪨🔨 https://t.co/WGIV2Q8hTW

    822209.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026

    It's hard to pick just one 🤔 This week's @Bojangles Player of the Game goes to our entire defense, who set some new records last night in a 22-10 win over Samford! ✅ -8 rushing yards allowed ✅ 13 tackles for loss ✅ 6 sacks All of those totals rank 2nd in FCS this week. https://t.co/ZVt1TuyuTX

    68100310K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026

    🔥 🔥 🔥 “Tell em where we from ya’ll” #PoundTheStone 🪨🔨 https://t.co/q8B21GBMWl

    705213.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 2026

    Your FirstBank Final Score The Lions gave Arkansas everything they could handle. We'll look to get back in the win column next week at Southeastern Louisiana. #RoarLions 🦁 https://t.co/Brj8S0NNL5

    5172521K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    “A stonecutter may strike a rock 100 times with no crack showing…yet the 101st strike splits it in two. It wasn't just that last strike, but all that went before.” #PoundTheStone 🪨🔨

    536114.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 2026

    Keep pounding 🪨🔨

    400303.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 2026

    Here are the top things to know for Saturday's grand opening at Bank Independent Stadium https://t.co/OmAcBcMDGy

    227013.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#poundthestone#roarlions#fcs#macandcube#purpleswarm

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 78 interactions against 69K followers, an engagement rate of 0.114%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 50% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.7K times each, and 1.66% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 174 interactions, about 2.2x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #poundthestone, #roarlions, #fcs.

What is Brent Dearmon's engagement rate on X?
Brent Dearmon (@BrentDearmon) has an engagement rate of 0.114%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 69,225 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.114%, Brent Dearmon sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,381 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @BrentDearmon have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 50% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @BrentDearmon post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going