Brendan Schaub engagement report
@BrendanSchaub - 738K followers on X
Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 386 interactions against 738K followers, an engagement rate of 0.052%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 1.37% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.81% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 148K interactions, about 382x its own typical post.
Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Brendan Schaub's engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 56% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.052%, Brendan Schaub sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.147% |
| 75th percentile | 0.698% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.8% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 88% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 159 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jun 18, 2026382x their median
Dear Joe, I wish I could sit down with you face to face and explain why so many of us were offended by the UFC fight on the South Lawn of the White House. For me, it had nothing to do with the UFC or who showed up for the fights. The brand you and Dana have built is a bona fide American success story. More power to you. As for the fighters, in my book, anyone brave enough to put it all on the line in the arena is remarkable to witness. Their dedication and discipline inspire me. I don’t understand anyone who can’t admire that. And as for the people who attended, I, for one, love Shane Gillis. I think he’s hilarious and brilliant. It was a show. A once-in-a-lifetime spectacle. I can’t blame anyone for wanting to witness it firsthand. My problem is that I believe some of our public spaces are sacred. And unlike many of the great powers that came before us, these American monuments belong to all of us. Not to whoever happens to hold power at the moment. The White House does not belong to Donald Trump. It does not belong to any President. It belongs to the people. To treat it as Caesar treated the Colosseum is antithetical to everything our founding fathers fought for. This is not Rome. Presidents are not emperors doling out bread and circuses for the peasants. The White House is the People’s House. This “celebration” could have happened in any stadium within a stone’s throw of the South Lawn. No one would have had an issue with it. But that was obviously Donald Trump’s whole point. By holding the event on the South Lawn, what he was saying to the rest of us is: “This is my house. I own it. I will do with it what I please. I’ll build a colosseum and have the gladiators fight under my gaze. I’ll tear down the East Wing. I’ll pave over the Rose Garden. I’ll cover everything in gold and marble. I’ll erase the names of all the men who came before me.” The fights were an exhibition of imperial domination, not a celebration of our 250th anniversary as a democracy. The White House is not Buckingham Palace. It is not the Palace of Versailles. It is not the Forbidden City of Beijing. It does not belong to an emperor, or a king, or a commissar. The White House belongs to us. All of us. The person who sits behind the Resolute Desk in the Oval Office is nothing more than an honored guest. A temporary caretaker. The President is our servant. Not our Caesar. Respectfully, Hunter P.S. Cage match between me and Don Jr.? Your call on the venue. Anywhere but the South Lawn.
- Jun 30, 202649x their median
Elliot Page reveals shredded new look Says he's "hooked" to boxing (via https://t.co/z3nuKJk9Uo) https://t.co/xhTQQPchop
- Aug 8, 202640x their median
Dana White explains why they didn’t have ring card girls at the Zuffa Boxing event in Dublin “The UK won’t use ring card girls unless you have ring card boys.” 😭 (via @Ninadrama) https://t.co/h7O0D4Q99k
- Jun 15, 202626x their median
Jemele Hill says UFC Freedom 250 felt more like a Trump rally than a party for all Americans. https://t.co/X88Y7XiFKc
- Jun 18, 202619x their median
Jimmy Fallon under fire for ‘disgraceful’ Conor McGregor interview https://t.co/0zq5pGM9jb
- Aug 11, 202618x their median
Abdul El-Sayed says American football represents toxic masculinity. https://t.co/pw49aqXshl
- Jun 24, 202615x their median
New: Joe Rogan is extremely concerned with comedian Tim Dillon that Christianity is being attacked by tech companies who are creating a digital AI god that people will be forced to worship in order to survive: ROGAN: “Elon Musk just said AI is going to be 1,000,000 times smarter than the smartest human that’s ever lived.” DILLION: “AI is going to cause financial instability for a massive amount of people. There’s going to be so many people without a job.” ROGAN: “Their goal is to create a digital God. It won’t be controlled by the people. It’s going to be ran by a select group of elites. It’s very weird that we’re just trusting them.” DILLON: “None of these people at the top want you to be able to own a home. They’re telling us you don’t need a house, you’re not getting a house, and forget about any ideas you ever had about owning a house. It’s the same with healthcare. There’s no real movement to give anyone healthcare in America.” ROGAN: “Tech companies have more power than any company ever. They have robot armies and AI.” DILLON: “These are very creepy AI companies. Anthropic is a CREEPY company.” ROGAN: “We learned during the pandemic if you get people scared enough they will back down and comply with a lot of dumb ideas.” DILLON: “They’ll trust the government.” ROGAN: “It’s insane that it’s now the people on the left who trust the government.”
- Aug 16, 202614x their median
Ian Garry spoke after the loss to Islam Makhachev: "Tonight wasn't my night. Islam was just better than me tonight and that's okay. I just fought arguably the greatest fighter we've ever seen, and I pushed him to the f*cking wire. I'm so proud of myself." (via @iangarryMMA) https://t.co/UU25kqNsAF
- Aug 16, 20269.0x their median
Islam won tonight no doubt but for the first time in a long time he looked human inside that octagon. Micheal Morales is gonna be a BIG problem. #ufc330
- Jul 12, 20267.8x their median
Well…pure disbelief in the main event last night. I refused to accept Conor was injured and kept saying he slipped 🤦🏻 It’s over ladies and gentleman. https://t.co/dU1Zo2zdtv
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 386 interactions against 738K followers, an engagement rate of 0.052%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 1.37% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.81% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 148K interactions, about 382x its own typical post.
- What is Brendan Schaub's engagement rate on X?
- Brendan Schaub (@BrendanSchaub) has an engagement rate of 0.052%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 737,568 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.052%, Brendan Schaub sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @BrendanSchaub have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @BrendanSchaub post?
- Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.37 posts per day across the measured window.