Robert ₿reedlove engagement report
@Breedlove22 - 455K followers on X
Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 203 interactions against 455K followers, an engagement rate of 0.045%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 1.32% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 48% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 28K interactions, about 140x its own typical post.
Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026. Recurring tag: #bitcoin.
Compared with accounts its own size
Robert ₿reedlove's engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 55% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.045%, Robert ₿reedlove sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,282 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.147% |
| 75th percentile | 0.698% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.9% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 48% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 4% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 48% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 4% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 442 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 26, 2026140x their median
Shopify billionaire co-founder & CEO Tobi Lütke — one of the most analytically rigorous founders alive — uses affirmations. His exact words: "If you tell yourself or write down something about yourself 100 times, it writes into the neurofrontal cortex at such a deep level that your brain will start reconciling you to that. It just works." His personal example: He was terrified of public speaking. For one week he sat down every day for 10 minutes and wrote: "I love public speaking." A week later the fear was gone. "It's not like a placebo. You just actively change your neurofrontal cortex in this moment." Your brain starts shaping your behavior around the identity you rehearse most.
- Aug 10, 202615x their median
Axis Arashi Breedlove: welcome to the world son 🙏🏼 https://t.co/1pqf2oxEye
- Sep 17, 202611x their median
In 2020, the US printed $6 trillion. The average American salary is $60,000 (that’s 100 million years of human labor stolen in a single year through currency debasement). If each person works roughly 50 productive years across their lifetime, that single instance of money printing (aka currency counterfeiting) equals 2 million human lifetimes’ worth of labor energy. You should figure it out, before it’s too late:
- Oct 24, 20268.1x their median
People beg me for a Bitcoin price prediction, so it's finally time to give it to you: Kiyosaki once pushed me for a number on a 10 to 15 year timeframe, so I said millions of dollars per Bitcoin in the 2030s. People find that unimaginable and crazy. What they don't take into account is the hyperinflation of the US dollar, which is underway right now, as it is with all fiat currencies, all the time. Anyone who's ever opened a history book knows that paper currencies unbacked by commodity money like gold or silver must end in hyperinflation. There's every incentive to print it into worthlessness, and no safeguard against such printing. They're either conquered and replaced, or they hyperinflate. That's literally the only thing that ever happens, without exception. As Charlie Munger says, show me the incentive and I'll show you the outcome. If you create a currency that can be printed ad infinitum with no restrictions, and it rewards the printer for printing it, what do you think is going to happen? They print the thing until it goes to zero. Of course. The dollar is a fiat currency shitcoin. So when you denominate Bitcoin in dollars, Bitcoin trading in the millions and tens of millions is as certain as the dollar being printed into worthlessness. I know that sounds scary if you're used to the dollar working. But you've got to zoom out. As Schopenhauer said, every man takes the limits of his field of vision for the limits of the world. Don't make that mistake. Study the fate of fiat currencies and you'll understand. This could be a multi-decade, multi-generational game. But directionally, I can say with a very high degree of certainty: Bitcoin number go up, US dollar number go down. So my prediction is that the Bitcoin price will go up forever.
- Mar 26, 20268.1x their median
My name is Robert Breedlove. I just turned 40 and have built a life that I love. To build this life, I used some powerful tools. Three of the most important tools I’ve used are: Hard Money, Hard Facts, and a Hard Body. To build a life that you love, you too must develop your own tools, and mastery over them. This is where I can help you. These tools form the three pillars of my new personal brand: - Hard Money: For almost twenty years, I’ve been a student of money. I will teach you about the nature of money and its influence on human beings, which will help you unplug your mind from the matrix, and perhaps make more money as a result. Through the study of money, you will support your own mental, spiritual, and financial freedom. - Hard Facts: For over twenty years, I’ve read roughly one book each week. I will share the deep insights I’ve gleaned from science, philosophy, and other non-fiction books. I will also tell you some stories about the many life lessons I’ve learned along the way… - Hard Body: For almost thirty years, I’ve trained my body like an athlete. I will share every detail of my fitness lifestyle including all my peptide, anabolic, nutrition, training, sleep, and recovery protocols. Optimal health is a key component of true wealth. Since I was a kid, I’ve always wanted to have it all. To excel in every domain of life: to be successful financially, to be highly intelligent, and to be in top physical form. Now that I’m 40, I want to help men like me who live their lives in pursuit of excellence. As I’ve grown into manhood, the pain of life’s many ups and downs has showed me the great value of philosophy: the process of learning to love wisdom, and learning to love wisely. I have spent years studying the teachings of wise men who have walked before us. I will share my insights from my studies, and from my years of struggles seeking love and wisdom. Inspired by the teachings history’s many wise men, and motivated by the #Bitcoin mission, I am committed to sharing all aspects of my life which might be valuable to you. In the ethos of open-source, my aim is to tell it all, regardless of how embarrassing or painful it is for me to share. Wisdom comes from our wounds, and sunlight is the best disinfectant. We all want to live a life we love. My aim is to help men who wish to pursue excellence in life’s many domains. Follow me for effective methods to get rich, to get smart, and to get ripped. And maybe along the way, you’ll find some nuggets of wisdom for yourself, too. Your attention is valuable to me, and I’ll do my best to draw it to things valuable to you. In doing so, I hope to help you build a life you love, too. Stay strong brothers 💪🏼
- Sep 18, 20267.7x their median
If you make over $250K a year, your single biggest bill every year is your taxes (often $60K to $100K+). Here's the completely legal strategy that wealthy people like Donald Trump use to shrink it to almost zero (THREAD):
- Oct 19, 20266.9x their median
The truth about size, testosterone, and what women want… https://t.co/Oavibb5rn7
- Oct 21, 20265.9x their median
A good definition of a slave is someone whose tax rate is 100%. All the fruits of their labor, all of them, 100%, go to a tax authority, the slave master. On the other side of that spectrum, someone with a 0% tax rate would be someone that’s fully self-owned, someone that’s fully sovereign. They keep all the fruits of their labor and they trade them freely with other self-owned people. That’s the opposite of a slave. You could call that a sovereign. We don’t have many of those people in the world today. They’re mostly what we refer to as sovereign nations. Most of us normal people just have some effective tax rate that we pay across all the activities in our life. Buying, investing, consuming, dying, everything gets taxed at every transaction in the modern world. So if you do all that math and figure out your effective tax rate, let’s say it’s 30%, my argument would be that you now know what percentage of a slave you are. You’re 30% slave and 70% sovereign, or free man. I’ve said it this way in the past and it triggers a lot of people, but I think it’s hard to argue with. We’ve come a long way. Today, something like slavery rubs all of our moral intuitions wrong, and most normal people would consider it abhorrent. Slavery still exists, less so in the whips and chains of traditional chattel slavery and more so in the less visible version called taxation, inflation, and statism. The Bitcoin mission and the Bitcoin thesis is all about creating a world with more sovereigns and ideally no slaves at all. Ideally, we want to get to a world where inflation is at zero, the central bank has been eliminated, and the market for money, the biggest and most important market in the world, is free. People are free to choose whatever money suits them best, interest rates are discovered freely in the marketplace, and slavery is finally reduced to 0% worldwide. That’s what we call the big bright orange future.
- Aug 17, 20265.7x their median
This is what Elon Musk understands about money that nobody else talks about: https://t.co/K7e0EuREuR
- Oct 16, 20265.2x their median
Someone told me they can't buy Bitcoin because they're living paycheck to paycheck. People like him don't understand how wealth works, so let me explain: Wealth is the ratio between your desires and your ability to fulfill them. So there are two ways to be rich. Want a lot and have a lot, or want very little and be content living lean. Both are wealth. I grew up poor, I've lived the lean version, and it builds a discipline most people never get. If you're living paycheck to paycheck, there's almost always something you're buying that you don't need. And a dollar not spent is a dollar you keep. My grandfather used to say the best way to double your money is to fold it in half and put it back in your pocket. So fold it. Cut the money leaking out on things that don't matter, and put it into the hardest money the human race has ever had. A dollar saved in fiat gets debased. A dollar spent on goods depreciates. A dollar saved in Bitcoin appreciates. Then let the pressure change you. Use the scarcity. Build a side income, cut your expenses, raise the ratio of what you earn to what you spend. There's an old line from The Art of War: ''if you want your soldiers to fight, burn the boats when you land on the beach. Put your back against the wall so the only way out is forward'' I won't pretend it gets easy. Even on the other side, more money more problems - but get tight with your money, get creative with your earning, and channel that scarcity into something that compounds. In short, burn the boats and stack sats. Future you will thank you.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 203 interactions against 455K followers, an engagement rate of 0.045%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 1.32% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 48% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 28K interactions, about 140x its own typical post.
- What is Robert ₿reedlove's engagement rate on X?
- Robert ₿reedlove (@Breedlove22) has an engagement rate of 0.045%, based on the median interactions across 27 original posts from the last 30 days against 454,987 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.045%, Robert ₿reedlove sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,282 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Breedlove22 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Breedlove22 post?
- Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.