Chris S. Cornell engagement report
@BiggestComeback - 64K followers on X
Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 150 interactions against 64K followers, an engagement rate of 0.236%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 63% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.9K times each, and 3.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.65% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video and 6% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.4K interactions, about 9.2x its own typical post.
Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Chris S. Cornell's engagement rate beats 63% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 72% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.236%, Chris S. Cornell sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.697%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.697% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.9% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 74% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 3% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 74% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 597 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Apr 3, 20259.2x their median
When I had cancer, my doctor didn’t ask if I could “sustain” the treatments. She told me they were necessary. Life or death. So every day—35 radiation sessions, 6 rounds of chemo—I got in my car and drove an hour to the treatment center. It was excruciating. Exhausting. Inconvenient. But nobody called it “too hard.” Nobody said, “Let’s just manage this and hope for the best.” And yet… When someone is diagnosed with type 2 diabetes—a condition we know can be reversed—the very idea of a lifestyle change is often dismissed. Not because it doesn’t work. But because it’s “not sustainable.” Let me be clear: I don’t have superhuman willpower. I failed to lose weight for decades. But after I finally lost 80 pounds using a therapeutic carbohydrate reduction approach, I tried a true ketogenic diet—strict, under 30 grams of carbs per day—for 21 days… Not because I needed to. But as an experiment. And I can tell you from personal experience: The ketogenic diet is nowhere near as painful, uncomfortable, or difficult to sustain as 35 days of chemo and radiation. If we’re willing to suffer to survive cancer… Why are we so quick to dismiss lifestyle change for the diseases that are slowly killing millions?
- Sep 22, 20262.5x their median
Well, this escalated quickly. Day 5 of my Claus Carlsen-inspired (modified) egg fast: Weight: 207.2 pounds Total loss: 8.4 pounds I’m already within my desired weight range. Here’s what I’m experiencing: Zero hunger. Zero cravings. High energy. Excellent sleep. Good—not great—workouts. More than 11,000 steps per day. Noticeably better focus at work. According to my newly revised nutrition rules, I don’t even need to eat eggs today because my weight is below 208. But I’m curious enough to continue until I reach 205—and possibly 203–204—provided my energy, strength and overall sense of well-being remain strong. The remarkable part is that this hasn’t even been a strict egg fast. I modified it with substantial protein-focused dinners partly because I didn’t want to sacrifice muscle—and partly because the weight was coming off more aggressively than my goal required. I expected to learn something from this experiment. I had no idea it would work this quickly. Claus may have undersold it.
- Sep 20, 20262.3x their median
BREAKING NEWS: Area man “cheats” on egg fast; weight drops 7.2 pounds in three days. Day 3 update: Five eggs with pickle slices in the late morning. Once again, zero hunger, cravings or desire for food. Around 6 p.m., I considered having seven more hard-boiled eggs, but I simply couldn’t stomach the idea. Instead, I grilled a pound of ground turkey burgers and topped them with two ounces of sharp cheddar. After three days centered around eggs, every bite tasted like a gourmet masterpiece. Then came a very disappointing UVA football game, a hard but successful shoulder workout and a tremendous 7.5 hours of sleep. This morning at 8:45: Weight: 208.4 pounds Total loss: 7.2 pounds Glucose: 88 mg/dL Ketones: 1.6 mmol/L Obviously, I’m not claiming that I lost 7.2 pounds of body fat. But the direction is clear, my workouts remain strong and my hunger and cravings are still completely absent. A few people have said the burgers I ate mean I already failed. Quite the contrary. This is an experiment, not a purity contest. Before starting, I decided that if my protein and total energy were extremely low, I could finish the day with meat and cheese. At 62, preserving muscle and strength matters far more to me than obeying someone else’s definition of an “egg fast.” I’m also beginning to understand Claus’s point about why this could work better than a water fast for some people. During a water fast, the choices are eat nothing or break the fast. That can become a test of willpower while your mind fantasizes about thousands of foods. Here, I always have permission to eat another egg. That option remains available, which seems to quiet the urgency to eat. The strange part is that I usually don’t want it. I feel great today. Back to the eggs…
- Sep 23, 20262.3x their median
After 6 days, I’m suspending my (modified) egg fast. Under Rule #7, I am officially granting myself parole from eggs. I accomplished more than I hoped to accomplish, and it happened considerably faster than I predicted. Thank you very much, Claus Carlsen (see link in next post). My appetite and cravings disappeared. My weight returned to my desired range. My Levi’s fit better, I look leaner, and my energy has been high enough that I’m aggressively attacking the weights in the gym. I’m getting my steps. I’m sleeping extremely well. It has been a tremendous week. No regrets whatsoever. Only gratitude. I am also very tired of eggs. It may be quite a while before I voluntarily eat another one. My priorities for the coming weeks are simple: 1) Keep my weight below 208 pounds. 2) Pack on as much muscle as possible. If another three or four pounds come off, that’s fine, but not at the expense of muscle mass, strength or performance. If I cross the 208-pound threshold, Rule 7 requires me to contemplate eating more eggs. Honestly, that may be the most effective weight-maintenance incentive I’ve ever created.😂
- Sep 22, 20262.1x their median
Just imagine how these tasted after an entire day of eating nothing but hard boiled eggs. Can you imagine? It’s Cary Kelly’s fault, dammit—he makes everything look so easy and delicious in those videos 😂 https://t.co/rOAzAv81DN
- Sep 18, 20262.0x their median
Calling a ketogenic diet “unsustainable” because many people stop following it is intellectually lazy. First, there is no single ketogenic diet. A tightly controlled therapeutic diet for childhood epilepsy is not the same as an adult eating meat, eggs, fish, dairy and low-carb vegetables. Second, dropout rates tell us what happened in a particular study. They do not tell us what every individual can sustain, nor whether the diet works for those who continue. Finally, if a health-restoring diet is difficult to maintain because of social pressure, family habits and a culture drowning in junk food, that is an indictment of our environment, not the diet. We don’t call exercise unsustainable because people quit the gym. James Clear nailed it: “One of the most effective things you can do to build better habits is to join a culture where your desired behavior is the normal behavior.” Find people who care about their health. Build an environment that supports yours. If an approach changes your life, don’t let someone else’s dropout rate decide what you can sustain.
- Sep 19, 20261.7x their median
11:30 am on Day 3: I just steamed another batch of eggs but was overcome with cravings for pickles. Sure, what the heck. The pickles really helped make it a lot more palatable, which was nice. https://t.co/AFHdLGCRBk
- Sep 21, 20261.7x their median
After many years, I’ve finally evicted nearly everyone who was living rent-free in my head. A few squatters remain. Proceedings are underway.
- Sep 21, 2026
I had 10 eggs ready for lunch today but really didn’t have the endurance to get past 7… This (modified) egg fast is hard work 😂 https://t.co/fCEdq5uyHw
- Sep 24, 2026
What’s for dinner? How about a BLT on a chaffle? https://t.co/zsajuzx1zr
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 150 interactions against 64K followers, an engagement rate of 0.236%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 63% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.9K times each, and 3.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.65% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video and 6% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.4K interactions, about 9.2x its own typical post.
- What is Chris S. Cornell's engagement rate on X?
- Chris S. Cornell (@BiggestComeback) has an engagement rate of 0.236%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 63,620 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.236%, Chris S. Cornell sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @BiggestComeback have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 63% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @BiggestComeback post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.9 posts per day across the measured window.