Back to @BigCaptainhook's profile

NOV12th πŸŽ‰πŸŽ‚β™οΈβ™οΈBigCaptainHookπŸ‘¨πŸ½β€βœˆοΈπŸ†πŸͺβ™οΈπŸ˜ˆβ™οΈ engagement report

@BigCaptainhook - 97K followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.008%
of 97K followers
Per impression
0.306%
2.6K views on a typical post
Reach
2.74%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
8
interactions (median)
Saved
0.038%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.53/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 97K followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.6K times each, and 0.306% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.68% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 64% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 74K interactions, about 9198x its own typical post.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026. Recurring tag: #thick.

Compared with accounts its own size

NOV12th πŸŽ‰πŸŽ‚β™οΈβ™οΈBigCaptainHookπŸ‘¨πŸ½β€βœˆοΈπŸ†πŸͺβ™οΈπŸ˜ˆβ™οΈ's engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 15% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.008%, NOV12th πŸŽ‰πŸŽ‚β™οΈβ™οΈBigCaptainHookπŸ‘¨πŸ½β€βœˆοΈπŸ†πŸͺβ™οΈπŸ˜ˆβ™οΈ sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,004 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,390 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link64% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 64% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 125 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 22, 20269198x their median

    Kurama or Shenron ? https://t.co/oAR58fiOVp

    71K2.5K320271.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202651x their median

    Daddy just woke πŸ†™ good ass nap 😴 that gas put daddy down below ⬇️ πŸ›Œ woke up dick was on 🧱 I’m horny come suck daddy dick rn baby πŸ‘€ 😏 πŸš— πŸ†™ or drop that mf lo πŸ“ im On my way! πŸ₯œ full of cum ain’t nut in a whole week πŸ₯΅πŸ’―πŸ’ͺ🏾where. My eater @ β„’οΈπŸ’š https://t.co/ptpGh5O5jf

    382230112K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.0x their median

    https://t.co/s2VU6q9BMm https://t.co/s2VU6q9BMm join live now or sub to my telegram channel over 1139 🎬 tap in to join or dm me lmk or comment join telegram now below https://t.co/xDR4TU3Qfh

    130302.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20261.8x their median

    Can you suck πŸ‘… πŸ‘„ dick as good as you talk about it though thats the real question? πŸ˜œπŸ˜ˆπŸ˜œπŸ“πŸ†πŸ“

    120022.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026

    https://t.co/s2VU6q9BMm join daddy live πŸ”— posted on page and here who wanna see daddy pretty big dick rn come join πŸ’―β™οΈπŸ’―πŸ‘ΏπŸ©³πŸ‘ΏπŸ†πŸ©³πŸ† https://t.co/NO3VGnVKwR

    10100906 viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026

    https://t.co/s2VU6q9BMm tap to n join my telegram giving out links πŸ”— for 35$ and πŸ†™ tap in now alarm wanna join dm me now or say it ⬇️ https://t.co/0BMdlidm6p

    61403.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 2026

    Up strokin & smoking you wanna join daddy πŸ˜ˆπŸ˜ˆπŸ˜ˆπŸ˜ˆπŸ˜ˆπŸ†πŸ₯œπŸ’°

    90003.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026

    https://t.co/s2VU6q9BMm telegram links πŸ”— for sale starting at 50$ 1159🎬πŸ”₯πŸŽ¬πŸ“ΈπŸ©²πŸ₯œ 200 pictures who wanna join dm me now or. Comment join now https://t.co/C1Sk5DbYhX

    61102.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    45% off come join now πŸ‘€ πŸ₯΅ ✨🎬πŸ”₯✨🎬πŸ”₯🀟🏾🀟🏾🀟🏾🀟🏾🀟🏾 https://t.co/dpn2tYIkWu

    40202.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 2026

    https://t.co/s2VU6q9BMm join live now link posted on πŸ“ƒ https://t.co/s2VU6q9BMm https://t.co/xjoBjXATSg

    40102.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#thick

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 97K followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.6K times each, and 0.306% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.68% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 64% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 74K interactions, about 9198x its own typical post.

What is NOV12th πŸŽ‰πŸŽ‚β™οΈβ™οΈBigCaptainHookπŸ‘¨πŸ½β€βœˆοΈπŸ†πŸͺβ™οΈπŸ˜ˆβ™οΈ's engagement rate on X?
NOV12th πŸŽ‰πŸŽ‚β™οΈβ™οΈBigCaptainHookπŸ‘¨πŸ½β€βœˆοΈπŸ†πŸͺβ™οΈπŸ˜ˆβ™οΈ (@BigCaptainhook) has an engagement rate of 0.008%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 97,430 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.008%, NOV12th πŸŽ‰πŸŽ‚β™οΈβ™οΈBigCaptainHookπŸ‘¨πŸ½β€βœˆοΈπŸ†πŸͺβ™οΈπŸ˜ˆβ™οΈ sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @BigCaptainhook have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @BigCaptainhook post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going