Back to @BLOCKLORDS's profile

BLOCKLORE engagement report

@BLOCKLORDS - 244K followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.007%
of 244K followers
Per impression
0.513%
3.3K views on a typical post
Reach
1.33%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
17
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.47/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
05:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 17 interactions against 244K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 19% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.3K times each, and 0.513% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.36% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 86% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 77 interactions, about 4.5x its own typical post.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

BLOCKLORE's engagement rate beats 19% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 27% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.007%, BLOCKLORE sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,282 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,282 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,403 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video86% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link14% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 86% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 14% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 291 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 5, 20264.5x their median

    Huge news, folks: BLOCKLORDS is now BLOCKLORE. We are closing the game. But don't worry, we're launching something even bigger: What we built instead is a node-based canvas for AI generation. Concept art, character consistency, video, editing, all connected in ONE workspace. You can check it out right here: https://t.co/PcZ1HJ1DPI 3,000,000 $LRDS goes out as a loyalty airdrop, weighted on what you contributed, spent and owned. Full details on how to claim at: https://t.co/I0gPPS1pcT $LRDS powers the canvas from here. You built the last thing. Come and build this one (more exciting things to come!).

    341523517K viewsView on X
  • Apr 24, 20265.1x their median

    The world is already changing ⚔️ Season progress is accelerating. Players unlocking rewards. Influence stacking faster every day. Steam Medieval Fest isn’t just something to check out - it’s something you either take part in… or miss momentum on. Double EXP is live. Daily rewards are waiting 👀 Step in 👇 https://t.co/XIqXQYMr18 #BLOCKLORDS #Steam #Gaming

    1213302.6K viewsView on X
  • Apr 23, 20264.9x their median

    Some came to explore.
 Others came to take control ⚔️ Steam Medieval Fest is underway - and the world is already taking shape. Every day this week, the momentum grows ⚔️ 
 More land claimed.
 More power consolidated.
 More stories unfolding in real time. How will your story begin? 👀 Step in and make your move 👇
 https://t.co/XIqXQYLTbA #BLOCKLORDS #Steam

    813501.8K viewsView on X
  • May 7, 20263.7x their median

    Blocklords Epic Games Store Update Maintenance starting soon! We're pushing bug fixes for the Store, Daily Check-in, and several battle improvements. ⏱️ Downtime: ~1 hour Thanks for your patience, Epic Lords! Back online shortly ⚔️ #Blocklords #EpicGamesStore

    1911304.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20261.8x their median

    Made with Seedance 2.5 + Blocklore https://t.co/ALGpS7mSGW

    188414.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20261.7x their median

    We built this scene to find out what our own tool does when you stop making clips and start making something that has to hold together. Thirty or so shots, one character who has to still be the same character at the end, and a lot of decisions that no model makes for you. We are going to take the whole thing apart over the next few weeks. The storyboards, the prompts, the character setup, and every continuity problem we hit along the way.

    1710204.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20261.5x their median

    With the Agent Editor on Blocklore, just type your instructions and it handles the cuts, transitions, text, and effects automatically: https://t.co/j95r5qFBup

    178103.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20261.5x their median

    Generating full video series manually takes a lot of effort. With the Agent on Blocklore, just describe your concept. It automatically generates every reference image and renders all your video clips directly on the canvas. https://t.co/gUwcSC3uEp

    177203.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 2026

    GPT Image 2 vs GPT Image 2.5 Flare vs GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst: We ran the same prompts through all three models to see what the 2.5 upgrade actually changes. Here are the results. Speed: Flare is the fastest by a wide margin. It finished about 2.3x faster than GPT Image 2 and about 1.8x faster than Sunburst. Sunburst was still around 1.3x faster than GPT Image 2. Image quality: Sunburst came out on top, with more natural lighting and slightly fewer AI hallucinations. Flare's quality is close to GPT Image 2, with a big speed advantage. Editing: Editing is where 2.5 is supposed to improve the most, so we gave each model the same image and asked for several edits in a row. All three models handled the first edits well and kept the rest of the image consistent. The differences showed up in the final edit: • GPT Image 2 had a clear placement error. • Flare had a small blending issue. • Sunburst got everything right. Pricing: Both 2.5 models cost the same per token as GPT Image 2. Which one to use: • Flare for fast results and lots of variations. • Sunburst for the best lighting and for images that need several rounds of edits.

    1410105.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 2026

    Added multi-track support to the editor so you can stack additional video and audio layers directly in your timeline: https://t.co/HtlHiLZ31F

    119103.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 17 interactions against 244K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 19% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.3K times each, and 0.513% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.36% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 86% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 77 interactions, about 4.5x its own typical post.

What is BLOCKLORE's engagement rate on X?
BLOCKLORE (@BLOCKLORDS) has an engagement rate of 0.007%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 243,828 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.007%, BLOCKLORE sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,282 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @BLOCKLORDS have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 19% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @BLOCKLORDS post?
Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going