Back to @AvivaKlompas's profile

Aviva Klompas engagement report

@AvivaKlompas - 268K followers on X

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.08%
of 268K followers
Per impression
0.868%
25K views on a typical post
Reach
9.22%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
215
interactions (median)
Saved
0.101%
25 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.47/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 215 interactions against 268K followers, an engagement rate of 0.08%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 0.868% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.23% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 27K interactions, about 101x its own typical post.

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Aviva Klompas's engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 39% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.08%, Aviva Klompas sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,186 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,186 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,400 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video13% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link33% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 13% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 33% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 991 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 23, 2023101x their median

    The IDF is going to attack our enemies by land, sea, and air. And the rest of us are going to fight on the battlegrounds of academia, law, business, media, and every other damn front we can think of.

    14K2.6K9.4K6197.7M viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202696x their median

    Dear celebrities: take a lesson from Ed Sheeran https://t.co/iM8doP9MVf

    24K1.2K329961.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202695x their median

    A devastating blow to Ed Sheeran, who has now lost several opening acts most people had to Google.

    23K1.1K55693283K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202643x their median

    Comedians are pulling out of a festival in Portugal because Jerry Seinfeld is headlining. His offense? Being Jewish. Seinfeld is not an Israeli politician, soldier, or government official. But the fact that he is Jewish and has a connection to Israel is apparently enough to make sharing a comedy festival with him morally unacceptable. We are constantly told that hostility toward Israel has nothing to do with hostility toward Jews. Meanwhile, Jews around the world are repeatedly subjected to political loyalty tests over Israel and punished when they give the “wrong” answer. https://t.co/z7YFos9WxZ

    6.9K1.4K3.0K232266K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202639x their median

    In a heavily Jewish neighbourhood in Toronto, a man speaks into a megaphone, accusing Jews of using "black magic" and "eating children." But this isn't just any guy. This is Abbas Hamze — an instructor at multiple Canadian colleges. Yeah, it's bad here. https://t.co/a65t5vqEal

    7.5K2.1K389150234K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202615x their median

    Oxford educated Rhodes Scholar and Man Booker Prize winning author Richard Flanagan argues that the Bondi ISIS terrorist attack massacre of Jews was not anti-Semitism. “Other than the two gunmen, where was the anti-Semitism on that day?” It’s like asking: Other than the shooting, how was the rest of your trip to Dallas, Mrs. Kennedy? Truly stunning how retarded the highly educated can sometimes be. https://t.co/XpEpEen56o

    3.3K4421953974K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 202614x their median

    A question for all the artists outraged that someone was “silenced” at a concert: Where was this outrage for the hundreds of people who went to the Nova music festival, were brutally slaughtered by Hamas, and silenced forever?

    3.2K35628821K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20269.8x their median

    Guess what the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) was recommending for America’s schoolchildren. To teach kids that the 9/11 terrorist attacks were carried out in “response” to America’s support for Israel and other U.S. policies. And among the recommended readings for high school students? Osama bin Laden’s “Letter to America.” https://t.co/sVn76ZbehF

    1.7K705926458K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20267.8x their median

    “Fans bought tickets to see Sheeran, not Macklemore, and they certainly didn’t buy them to attend a lecture about Gaza. Macklemore understood that Sheeran’s fans weren’t willing participants — in fact, that was precisely the point. He wanted access to stadiums full of tens of thousands of people assembled by someone else, for something else, so that he could use them as a captive audience for his political message.” From @bethanyshondark ➡️ https://t.co/yVMUuce3lx

    1.8K22043834K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20264.4x their median

    Ed Sheeran says what has happened in Gaza is “catastrophic, unjustifiable and disproportionate.” The loss of civilian life in Gaza is tragic. But “unjustifiable” and “disproportionate” are different claims. Israel did not choose this war. Hamas invaded Israel on October 7, murdered civilians, took hostages, and vowed to do it again. Israel had every justification to respond militarily. And proportionality does not mean equal numbers of dead on both sides. It is a principle of international law -and the accusation that Israel intentionally harms civilians is both a lie and an incentive for Hamas to continue operating from behind civilians and driving up the civilian death toll. Have you noticed that in so much of the outrage over Gaza, Hamas disappears? If you are devastated by what has happened to Palestinians in Gaza, you should be furious with Hamas. There is something profoundly wrong with an account of this war in which Israel is painted as evil for responding to a war it did not start, fighting to bring its hostages home, and trying to prevent another October 7.

    92413992928K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 215 interactions against 268K followers, an engagement rate of 0.08%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 0.868% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.23% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 27K interactions, about 101x its own typical post.

What is Aviva Klompas's engagement rate on X?
Aviva Klompas (@AvivaKlompas) has an engagement rate of 0.08%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 268,369 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.08%, Aviva Klompas sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,186 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AvivaKlompas have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AvivaKlompas post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going