AverageJonas π³π΄ engagement report
@Average_Jonas - 261K followers on X
Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 411 interactions against 261K followers, an engagement rate of 0.157%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 2.03% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.74% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 28x its own typical post.
Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
AverageJonas π³π΄'s engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 63% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.157%, AverageJonas π³π΄ sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,805 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.697%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.697% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 83.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 58% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 58% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 194 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 10, 202628x their median
An Old School RuneScape player spent over two years catching only shrimp and anchovies to reach level 99 Fishing The grind took 4,304 hours and involved catching over 532,000 fish https://t.co/Qc3b7tpO3o
- Aug 8, 202614x their median
Closed alpha game. People will look you in the face and say Deadlock wonβt be a success. https://t.co/mEkrXntTlv
- Mar 17, 20247.1x their median
Had several guests at the new cabin already and they were super happy! If anyone wants to stay here in western Norway msg me for AirBNB info! :) https://t.co/Lv29EraL83
- Aug 6, 20265.8x their median
Deadlock ranked feels like what I like to call Wraith Bingo. First stage is whether you or the enemy gets the Wraith player. Second stage is whether she goes 0/10 or 10/0, probably 0/10 if she's on your team! Either way you are forced to either fight and lose 5v6 all game until your Wraith hopefully outscales the other team, or ur gonna fight 6v5 all game and hope that u can finish before Thanos gathers all his infinity stones and 1v6s you. Games just feel dragged out and boring and Wraith is the problem. Her kit is so overloaded and if this was any other MOBA she would have a terrible laning stage to compromise the absurd power in her kit but instead she gets a million damage on 800 souls because for some reason the card gets 2 full charges after 1 AP. She buys Dispel Magic and doesn't get killed unless you seriously organize and communicate to stop her early but (especially in EU) the team doesn't want to talk so it's GG go next and hope Wraith is on your team this time. I experienced this for 5 hours today back to back SMILE I LOVE DEADLOCK
- Jul 31, 20265.1x their median
*High Elo Deadlock players*: WE WANT CHANGE WE WANT MATCHMAKING, VISIBLE RANKS AND DRAFT AND BETTER HERO COMPS!! PEOPLE NEED TO FIGHT FOR WHAT THEY BELIEVE IN!! LESS SMURFING STACKING AND BOOSTING! *Valve adds pretty much all of this* *High Elo Deadlock players*: DOGSHIT UPDATE NOW IM ORACLE AND I CANT CLIMB BACK TO WHERE I BELONG IN MY FICTIONAL RANK WITHOUT REWARDS BECAUSE I REALIZED I HAVE TO GRIND FOR IT INSTEAD OF HITTING E6 ONCE AND STAY THERE EVERY DAY UNTIL I DIE Why are we acting like we never have experienced a soft reset before? I know most games that have soft resets have some sort of mechanic that makes u speedclimb back to ur rank but holy shit man the game is under development, every time a big update launches it is a huge step in the right direction. Itβs not perfect YET, but itβs pretty good IMO. If you really dislike it, go to the forums, write constructive feedback, or maybe wait more than 24 hours before making up your mind OR take a break if u hate it that much. So many things have been added to the game that people have posted on forums, they DO listen. This crying on Twitter is getting old. Time to play Deadlock for 12 hours cya guys
- Aug 5, 20264.3x their median
Returning to Valorant for my Birthday (august 20th 9am CEST) https://t.co/8wXqEAeClD
- Aug 24, 20263.7x their median
Unc still got it https://t.co/CMxYFtH8h9
- Jul 31, 20263.6x their median
People complaining about not having 15 wins on 3 heroes because they have 2-3+ accounts. You are part of the problem and now you get to experience the consequences of being a smurfing simon. W Yoshi Also, maybe this is a hot take but if you canβt bother to win 15 games on 3 heroes you donβt sound like someome who acruslly wants to grind ranked and improve. There should be a certain hero skill expectation in a ranked match to make the game quality higher/more fair for everyone involved. I am curious how the standard mode vill evolve over time though, sounds fun to test some really silly builds there or use it as a slightly more relevant practice mode than Street Brawl
- Aug 29, 20263.0x their median
Big Brain Sova Main https://t.co/5Z6xDrYaoM
- Aug 19, 20262.4x their median
I wish I didn't have to make this Tweet right before my Birthday Valorant stream but DO NOT WORK WITH Fuzey Designs. I paid over $1000 and I DID NOT get even close to what I ordered. It started off with a bunch of DMs like these that I didn't originally see, before a friend of mine recommended them cause I wanted new and more fancy alerts so I started talking to them. I had no reason not to trust Basim btw he is a nice guy and wanted to help a friend out, he is not to blame at all. I added saltytaco on Discord who is the contact person to do the order and we started going over in detail what I wanted my alerts to be and what the timeline was. Mind you this was June 17 and I was given a 2 weeks estimated time. We filled out an order form in detail to make sure all the full screen alert ideas were on the same page with Animations of Deadlock characters doing certain abilities but I was warned that they might not be able to fully recreate their movement, which is fair 2 weeks later I ask whats the hold up as I have recieved nothing of value and I was told there's a few delays. Another 2 weeks passed by and I learned that the animator was currently busy designing a bunch of slot machines for another client and that's why it was delayed. At this point I only had a starting soon screen which I later found out was most likely made by AI because it had a bunch of artifacts and looked really bad and had to be remade from scratch. (1/5)
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 411 interactions against 261K followers, an engagement rate of 0.157%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 2.03% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.74% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 28x its own typical post.
- What is AverageJonas π³π΄'s engagement rate on X?
- AverageJonas π³π΄ (@Average_Jonas) has an engagement rate of 0.157%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 261,150 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.157%, AverageJonas π³π΄ sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,805 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Average_Jonas have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Average_Jonas post?
- Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.8 posts per day across the measured window.