Back to @AskAaronLee's profile

Aaron Lee engagement report

@AskAaronLee - 914K followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 914K followers
Per impression
0.274%
6.2K views on a typical post
Reach
0.68%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
17
interactions (median)
Saved
0.016%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.73/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 17 interactions against 914K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 6.2K times each, and 0.274% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.679% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video, 18% are part of a thread and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 217x its own typical post.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Aaron Lee's engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 19% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, Aaron Lee sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,349 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.696%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,349 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,452 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.696%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video27% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link9% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 27% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 9% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 541 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Dec 28, 2025217x their median

    Master these 10 habits in 2026. Feel amazing, reclaim agency + self-respect. 1. final food 4 hr before bed 2. screens off 30 min before bed 3. avoid blue light 2hr before bed, use red/amber 4. book in hand 10 min before sleep 5. go to bed same time every night 6. light in eyes when waking (sun or 10k lux) 7. walk for 10 min immediately following eating 8. daily exercise (even if for 20 min) 9. eat good stuff, ditch the junk 10. foster friends, family and love They read as simple. I promise they'll change your life. Make them non-negotiate life habits. Do them every_single_day. Once you establish the habits, it is very easy to maintain. Stick with it for two weeks and start getting the dividends.

    15K1.4K298119902K viewsView on X
  • Dec 17, 2025316x their median

    KNICKS WIN!!! https://t.co/yqRN5ypS9R

    11K2.0K238256652K viewsView on X
  • Apr 13, 2026155x their median

    Several animals were killed and others injured after a van carrying pets from a Melaka animal shelter was hit by a lorry while en route to a pet expo at Mid Valley Exhibition Centre yesterday. The van, carrying 20 cats and five dogs, had earlier stopped in the emergency lane along the North-South Expressway due to engine issues when it was allegedly struck from behind, said the Star Animal Shelter. 📸: Star animal shelter malacca/Instagram 🧵1

    7.7K3.8K115472621K viewsView on X
  • Dec 18, 2025245x their median

    A solo ‘WOLVERINE’ movie starring Hugh Jackman is reportedly in development at Marvel Studios. (Via: MyTimeToShineHello) https://t.co/3GKCa5Kj0b

    7.9K5045781.3K5.7M viewsView on X
  • Dec 21, 202521x their median

    I'm not supposed to say this, but screw it. I’m not shutting up about it @YouTube I played by every rule. Won a legal case (Case #3007912819) against YouTube 5 months ago. Did everything right. But what's happening now? Honestly insulting. Let's talk about STANDARDS YouTube's STANDARDS for terminating a creator's channel: ❌ Standard of evidence: NONE ❌ Standard of decision-making: AI moderation ❌ Standard of explanation: Copy/paste policy header and vague policy link ❌ Standard of documentation: ZERO (creators see nothing) ❌ Standard for appeal review: Automated rejection in minutes ❌ Legal Standard: Violating EU Digital Services Act (Article 17(1)(e) and (4) of the DSA) by failing to provide evidence and reasons for termination. ❌ Standard for creator support: Automated responses with no clear answers. If you somehow reach a human, you can get banned for 30 days just for asking fair questions. My STANDARDS for defending my channel and my rights as a creator for the last 13 months: ✅ Legal Standard: Won a legal case and followed the DSA to the letter ✅ Standard of documentation: Complete documentation of every detail and every step, showing editing timelines, scripts, voiceovers, research, sources, and even the channels that were stealing my scripts, literally everything ✅ Standard of evidence: Legal-grade evidence, a legal decision showing termination was wrong and my content is legit ✅ Standard of explanation: Justified every step in detail ✅ Standard of review: Endured a 6-month independent legal process while patiently defending my rights ✅ Standard of content: YouTube's own employee made a rare human review of my channel in June 2024 and found no violations, confirming I follow the community guidelines (months before termination happened) ➡️My STANDARDS: As high as they can go for one small creator. ➡️YouTube's STANDARDS: please drop in the comments how YOU would describe these standards. (I'd rather not share the word I have in mind...) And here's the crazy part: ❗️I had to hold myself to impossibly high standards just to defend myself. ❗️I provided evidence YouTube never provided. ❗️I spent more than a year proving wrong what their AI decided in seconds. ❗️I won a legal case because that was the only way to fight back for me. And YouTube??? YouTube still can't meet the basic standard of following a legal decision or showing what I violated. YouTube operates with zero STANDARDS for itself. But the system forces creators to meet impossible STANDARDS just to survive. How is that fair to anyone? I stood up for my channel with legal facts and professional rigor. YouTube is responding with silence, ignorance, and automated replies/emails. I have done my part. I proved my innocence. @TeamYouTube Now please do your part. Please reinstate the channel. 🆘 I need your help: RT this and like Please make them listen, so they can't pretend that nothing happened. It's time for answers! #YouTubeAIWrongedCreators @YouTubeCreators @YouTubeInsider

    1.3K334501343K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 202667x their median

    Be honest… when was the last time you called it “Twitter” instead of X? 👀 https://t.co/UlQNEe1AWf

    327356898267K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 202656x their median

    https://t.co/UEALP027gm

    2152270512105K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 202652x their median

    Name a movie you've seen more than 10 times with just a GIF

    18496305470K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20218.4x their median

    I wished I can travel to #okinawa again. https://t.co/gLxbhIf3OC https://t.co/kElzDluobw

    405200476View on X
  • Apr 16, 20262.1x their median

    Name a movie you've seen more than 10 times with just a GIF

    2831161616K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 17 interactions against 914K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 6.2K times each, and 0.274% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.679% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video, 18% are part of a thread and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 217x its own typical post.

What is Aaron Lee's engagement rate on X?
Aaron Lee (@AskAaronLee) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 913,905 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, Aaron Lee sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,349 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AskAaronLee have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AskAaronLee post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going