Back to @Annakhait's profile

Anna Khait engagement report

@Annakhait - 339K followers on X

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.023%
of 339K followers
Per impression
0.958%
8.0K views on a typical post
Reach
2.36%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
77
interactions (median)
Saved
0.012%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2/day
active 83% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 77 interactions against 339K followers, an engagement rate of 0.023%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.0K times each, and 0.958% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.37% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 7% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 65K interactions, about 847x its own typical post.

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026. Recurring tag: #readingtheword.

Compared with accounts its own size

Anna Khait's engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 46% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.023%, Anna Khait sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,825 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9983.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,825 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,436 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video7% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 7% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 233 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 16, 2026847x their median

    🚨WHAT ON EARTH?!! The TEACHER OF THE YEAR in Nashville TM just walked away from her career B says the district ORDERED HER TO FABRICATE GRADES. She refused. So they went into the system and CHANGED IT THEMSELVES. According to the teacher, a student didn’t finish a project. Hardcastle (the teacher) gave the grade the student earned. Then a parent came in and SAT IN THE OFFICE FOR HOURS until that grade changed. Three administrators huddled up and decided the AWARD-WINNING TEACHER was the problem. She still refused to change the grade. So they overrode her and changed it ANYWAY. She quit in May and put all of it in a three-page resignation letter. It’s public. Read it yourself. She calls it GRADE FABRICATION. And then she stood up in front of the school board and said the quiet part into a microphone: “Statistics are being skewed to protect the district, not our children.” Our kids can’t read. Can’t write. Can’t do basic math. But the DASHBOARD LOOKS GREAT. AND SHE IS NOT THE ONLY ONE. WSMV4 Investigates pulled the internal emails of Diana Wills, a math teacher at Overton High. Administrators told her she had to hand failing students a D — over a PAPERWORK TECHNICALITY about parent notification. One kid was told again and again to make up his exams and never bothered. She was on medical leave for most of that semester. She put her refusal in writing: “What is being done is unethical and could very well be interpreted as illegal.” THE DISTRICT SUSPENDED HER. She’s suing them right now. At MNPS, when a teacher and an administrator disagree about a grade, THE ADMINISTRATOR WINS. Not the person who taught the class. Not the person who graded the work. The bureaucrat whose numbers go UP when your kid passes. HOMESCHOOL YOUR KIDS!!!!!

    48K15K1.2K575747K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026108x their median

    God Is Great! https://t.co/8TA11J9bJk

    7.2K8701806468K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 202643x their median

    What’s more tragic than dying too soon? Dying without knowing Jesus. This life is temporary. Eternity is not.

    3.1K18941323K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202640x their median

    Who here never took the Covid vaccine? I didn’t. ✋🏼

    2.6K594242739K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 202612x their median

    “Once saved, always saved” is one of the greatest deceptions in the Church today.

    466304233171K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202610x their median

    It’s 2026, and people are actually debating whether a mother who killed her three children should be held responsible for their deaths. The fact that this is even controversial should concern everyone.

    6768121110K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20269.0x their median

    Never has the divide between good and evil been more obvious.

    6185420312K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20268.7x their median

    If the Papacy is false, Christianity is false

    247123555861K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20267.9x their median

    If you proclaim that Catholicism is the center of your life, you have religion. As a believer, Jesus Christ should be the center of your life.

    44037122612K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20266.0x their median

    Jesus truly is the Prince of Peace. I have never experienced more peace and joy in my life than I have with Him. ❤️

    433256011K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#readingtheword

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 77 interactions against 339K followers, an engagement rate of 0.023%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.0K times each, and 0.958% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.37% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 7% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 65K interactions, about 847x its own typical post.

What is Anna Khait's engagement rate on X?
Anna Khait (@Annakhait) has an engagement rate of 0.023%, based on the median interactions across 29 original posts from the last 30 days against 339,408 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.023%, Anna Khait sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,825 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Annakhait have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Annakhait post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going