Back to @AngelaMaiers's profile

Angela Maiers - Keynote | Author | Change Maker engagement report

@AngelaMaiers - 122K followers on X

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.069%
of 122K followers
Per impression
2.29%
3.6K views on a typical post
Reach
2.99%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
84
interactions (median)
Saved
0.123%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.13/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 84 interactions against 122K followers, an engagement rate of 0.069%. Posts are seen about 3.6K times each, and 2.29% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.00% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.13 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.9K interactions, about 71x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.069%, Angela Maiers - Keynote | Author | Change Maker sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,098 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,393 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link50% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 50% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 297 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Feb 27, 202671x their median

    Nobody is talking about this. The children born today will never know a world without autonomous AI. They won’t Google things. They’ll ask an agent. They won’t learn to code. They’ll learn to direct. They won’t write resumes. There may not be jobs to apply to. We’re raising the first generation of humans who will grow up alongside minds that aren’t human. And we’re parenting them with a 1995 playbook. The most important skill you can teach your kids right now isn’t math or coding. It’s how to think. How to discern. How to stay human when everything around them isn’t.

    4.6K929351108207K viewsView on X
  • Mar 10, 202640x their median

    Students need to read books. Entire books. Our society is distracted, unfocused, and in a hurry. A curriculum that rushes through content perpetuates the anxiety of our time. Reading a book (slowly and leisurely) is a countercultural act.

    2.6K555993065K viewsView on X
  • Mar 10, 20267.3x their median

    What’s changed with students since Covid? Plenty. But one thing stands out to me: stamina. The stamina to read. The stamina to write. It wasn’t perfect before Covid, but it feels like it’s gotten worse. What do you think?

    5102372514K viewsView on X
  • Mar 11, 20266.4x their median

    “My child can’t read!” That’s become a common complaint from parents. Why? It might be because kids are distracted by social media and video games. But I think it’s also because reading instruction became lazy and political. https://t.co/X2fyD7DCQm

    4265946817K viewsView on X
  • Feb 27, 20266.4x their median

    This might be the most important insight regarding the decline of public education. The consumer (parents) are watching grades as the Key Performance Indicator. So grade inflation is serving as an effective mask for school performance. The plummeting outcomes on standardized assessments should worry everyone as much as they concern the K-12 education community. But they won’t as long as report cards are full of A’s and B’s. @jillbarshay on the latest study sending the same signals about parent attitudes.

    375845722290K viewsView on X
  • Mar 11, 20263.6x their median

    I just read an article about the saturation of devices and YouTube videos in k-12 classrooms. Some parents complained that students were “being read to” by YouTube instead of their teachers. Why in the world would teachers want to delegate one of the best parts of teaching?!

    227560916K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20261.9x their median

    Make direct instruction, science of reading, knowledge-based curriculum, tech-minimal classrooms, classic books, high expectations, rigorous testing, and discipline the norm in every American school.

    13023825.8K viewsView on X
  • Mar 8, 2026

    The National Reading Panel was the most comprehensive study of reading instruction ever done. It was a "metastudy" (a study of studies). It looked at all of the research on reading methods that had yet been done. ALL of it. It determined which studies met basic research criteria (most studies on anything, especially education, are schlock) and only considered them. It found that programs using systematic phonics are more effective than those that use unsystematic approaches or no phonics at all. The critics of phonics have a hard time dealing with this.

    7711524.8K viewsView on X
  • Jan 30, 2025

    Set a reminder for my upcoming Space! https://t.co/RTwo6OISN5

    255524.6K viewsView on X
  • Feb 27, 2026

    In a real sense, the most important inequality is between people with driving purpose and confidence on one hand, and people who have accepted passivity and dependence on the other. That's the most brutal divide. One group is going to thrive regardless of circumstances. The other group is going to struggle. School is actively creating this inequality. It's sorting kids into the passive and dependent category by training those qualities every day for years. The gap between the two groups gets wider every year. And school is making it worse, not better.

    293022.2K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 84 interactions against 122K followers, an engagement rate of 0.069%. Posts are seen about 3.6K times each, and 2.29% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.00% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.13 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.9K interactions, about 71x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Angela Maiers - Keynote | Author | Change Maker's engagement rate on X?
Angela Maiers - Keynote | Author | Change Maker (@AngelaMaiers) has an engagement rate of 0.069%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 121,554 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.069%, Angela Maiers - Keynote | Author | Change Maker sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AngelaMaiers have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @AngelaMaiers post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going