Back to @AlphaInsiders's profile

Alpha Insiders engagement report

@AlphaInsiders - 104K followers on X

Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.017%
of 104K followers
Per impression
0.474%
3.8K views on a typical post
Reach
3.63%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
18
interactions (median)
Saved
0.053%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.83/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 104K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 24% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.8K times each, and 0.474% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.63% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video and 56% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 743 interactions, about 41x its own typical post.

Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Alpha Insiders's engagement rate beats 24% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 23% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.017%, Alpha Insiders sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,349 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.696%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,349 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,452 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.696%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video69% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link56% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 69% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 56% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 773 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 5, 202641x their median

    Your place in the arena starts with a Mind. Our collection will have a total supply of 3,333 Minds, priced at 0.0125 ETH each. Get ready: https://t.co/1vr08e6Ks9 https://t.co/QiuYXiLTSU

    442881565732K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20267.7x their median

    Your old wallets might be holding money you forgot about. If you were active in airdrops, bridges, or DeFi, run through these: 1. Privy — wallets you created with social login https://t.co/ZA0kGuC0xy 2. Sablier — tokens still vesting or unclaimed airdrops https://t.co/MCaoSzyz1N 3. Streamflow — same idea, different chains https://t.co/zdZUXTtkdL 4. Perp Radar — leftover balances on perp DEXs https://t.co/eOyIsUrnVV 5. Stuck Funds — bridged assets that never landed https://t.co/WPClpj2xWG 6. Merkl — unclaimed DeFi rewards https://t.co/Ifu6Z9Rbe5 7. Jupiter Portfolio — Solana assets and airdrops https://t.co/6pQrfM8W1i 8. DeBank — EVM assets across chains https://t.co/vf748XjfDJ You'd be surprised what's still sitting there.

    106282318K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20264.5x their median

    NEAR Confidential Rewards program is heading into its next phase. The first round rewarded users based on their activity inside NEAR’s Confidential environment, and the next round is expected to follow the same basic idea. If you want to position yourself for the next reward: → Keep Fund (at least $100+) in Confidential Balance → Make Confidential Swaps → Keep your balance there and stay active over time One important detail: you must actually use Confidential Mode. Simply holding assets in your normal NEAR account does not count. Getting started is simple: →Go to https://t.co/o629ePH8fu →turn on Confidential Mode →make a swap through Confidential Intents (in Home section) The first round used a $100+ balance and at least one Confidential Swap as the eligibility threshold. More eligible activity contributed to a larger allocation, although NEAR did not publish the exact scoring formula. NEAR has confirmed that more reward rounds are coming. The next one is being referred to across the ecosystem as [email protected], with a reported 666,666-token pool. So if you’re interested, starting early makes more sense than waiting for the final days.

    763208.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20264.5x their median

    Jumper is officially launching the $JUMP token sale on Legion. The sale opens Sept. 29 at 13:00 UTC and closes Oct. 2 at 13:00 UTC. Key terms: • Sale price: $0.075 per JUMP • FDV: $75M • Fixed supply: 1B JUMP • Public sale: 40M JUMP (4% of supply) • Target raise: $2M • Hard cap: $3M • Payment: $USDC on Ethereum • 50% unlock at TGE, remaining 50% linearly over 4 months • TGE expected in Q4 2026 - This is NOT a first-come-first-served sale. Allocation is reputation-based, with Jumper XP holders getting priority based on their XP level, while the Top 500 from the Jumper waitlist also receive priority. - That waitlist was opened earlier this month: connect X, verify your account and climb the leaderboard through referrals. If you were already farming Jumper XP or pushed for the Top 500, that activity now matters for the sale. https://t.co/vqOgxrIdsn - One important distinction: Jumper has allocated 33.33% of total JUMP supply to the community in its published materials, but the team has NOT said that the full 33.33% is an airdrop or explained exactly how it will be distributed. So don't treat random “airdrop allocation” numbers circulating on X as confirmed. - To participate, check your eligibility and apply directly through Legion. A pledge does NOT guarantee an allocation, and oversubscription can reduce final allocations. https://t.co/WeAtJf3ZhE Use only the official Legion page. Don't connect your wallet or sign transactions through links posted by random accounts.

    704619.7K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 20262.6x their median

    Starknet might be leaving Ethereum. The market is already reacting. ethereum:0xca14007eff0db1f8135f4c25b34de49ab0d42766 surged over 40% in 24 hours, breaking above $0.10, after Starknet said it's “actively considering” becoming an independent Layer 1. The reason: greater control over its security upgrades, with a target of becoming fully quantum-resistant by 2027. As an Ethereum L2, @Starknet still depends on Ethereum for parts of its security model, including its bridge and data availability. Becoming an L1 could give it more control, but would also mean taking on more responsibility for its own security. StarkWare backs the direction. But there's no final decision, governance approval, launch date, or migration plan yet. This is a proposal under consideration, not a confirmed departure from Ethereum. One thing to watch: 127M STRK unlock on October 15. That's additional supply becoming transferable while the market is already heating up. It doesn't mean all those tokens will be sold. And despite the rally, STRK remains still roughly 98% below its all-time high.

    402416.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20262.3x their median

    Reya is moving into v2. Reya is a trading-focused network building an on-chain venue for perpetuals and other markets. It has raised $16M in private funding from investors including Coinbase Ventures, Framework Ventures, Wintermute, and others. It also raised around $3M through its CoinList public token sale. the important part: Reya v2 is entering Private Beta, with Season 2 now live. The biggest change is the move from an AMM to an order book designed for faster, more efficient trading and deeper liquidity. Early v2 markets include ETH, BTC, SOL, HYPE and XRP, with more markets expected to follow. There is also a Golden Ticket system: holders can give one ticket per week to another user, allowing them to skip the queue and access the order book. Reya v2 is now live in Private Beta. https://t.co/u296RRsoXO

    345215.7K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20262.3x their median

    Ethereum just got its first atomic L1-to-L2 transaction. In plain English: one action happened on Ethereum mainnet, another happened on an L2, and both were tied together in a single transaction. The test moved just 0.001 ETH, roughly $2.70, while updating the L2 at the same time. If one part had failed, the whole thing would have been cancelled. That’s the idea behind an atomic transaction: it either all goes through, or none of it does. Why is that interesting? Right now, moving assets between Ethereum and an L2 can mean using a bridge, signing multiple transactions, and waiting around. EEZ is trying to make the whole process feel less like moving between separate networks and more like using one connected system. If this works at scale, apps on different L2s could eventually interact in the same transaction, with less bridge hassle and less liquidity stuck in separate places. Still, no need to call it a breakthrough just yet. This was a small technical demo, not a finished product. ethereum:native

    332605.1K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20261.9x their median

    Titan Exchange, Canton Testnet is LIVE Another privacy-focused Perp DEX worth keeping an eye on. Built on @CantonNetwork , Titan aims to bring private trading, anonymized order books, and dark-pool functionality to on-chain markets. How to get started: Join the waitlist: https://t.co/r7DpsL6hD3 Open the testnet: https://t.co/r8nCLt0zGn -Connect your EVM wallet. -Click USDCx on your connected account → open the menu → claim faucet. -Enable trading and complete testnet perp trade: Note: No confirmed airdrop, token allocation, or snapshot. It's a different project from Titan on Solana. Stick to test assets. Don't deposit real funds.

    321105.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20261.8x their median

    Airdrops are supposed to build communities, but how many people actually stick around? @Bitquery_io looked at 51 large EVM airdrops from January to September 2026, covering more than 2M claiming wallets and around $848M worth of tokens at the time they were claimed. In the typical airdrop, 73% of wallets moved at least some of their tokens within a day. After 30 days, only 23% were still holding at least half of what they received. Price action wasn’t great either. Of the 46 tokens old enough to check, 35 were trading below their median first-week price by Sept. 29. The median drop was 48%. Moving tokens doesn’t necessarily mean selling them, and wallet balances don’t tell us whether someone is still active in a project. still, it raises a pretty simple question: Are airdrops actually building long-term communities?

    213715.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20261.5x their median

    Jumper Perps is now live for early testing. Access is currently open to the top 1,000 XP holders, with Jumper asking them to test the product and provide feedback. https://t.co/M1hII16Fm6 But there’s also a Perps access form for those who want to get in: https://t.co/wiVtnU4N3B @jumperapp started mainly as a bridge and swap aggregator. Now it’s moving into perpetuals and bringing multiple perp venues into one trading interface. Meanwhile, the $JUMP token sale on Legion is already seeing heavy demand. The sale closes Oct. 2 at 1:00 PM UTC.

    251104.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 104K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 24% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.8K times each, and 0.474% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.63% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video and 56% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 743 interactions, about 41x its own typical post.

What is Alpha Insiders's engagement rate on X?
Alpha Insiders (@AlphaInsiders) has an engagement rate of 0.017%, based on the median interactions across 45 original posts from the last 30 days against 104,446 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.017%, Alpha Insiders sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,349 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AlphaInsiders have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 24% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AlphaInsiders post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going