Allan Lucky (Host: Klub A-Z Podcast) engagement report
@Allan_Lucky - 103K followers on X
Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 103K followers, an engagement rate of 1.07%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 58K times each, and 1.89% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 56.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 9.8x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nguvumoja, #kariakooderby, #nbcpremierleague.
Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026. Recurring tags: #nguvumoja, #kariakooderby, #nbcpremierleague.
Compared with accounts its own size
Allan Lucky (Host: Klub A-Z Podcast)'s engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 59% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 1.07%, Allan Lucky (Host: Klub A-Z Podcast) sits above the 75th percentile of the 212,925 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.698% to 2.61%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.698% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 83.0% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 44% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 44% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 194 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 10, 20269.8x their median
π¨ π‘ππͺ: Cristiano Ronaldo becomes the first person to reach 680 million followers on IG. π± https://t.co/aBDUc82CgM
- Oct 13, 20266.8x their median
"We have 2 ways β forget the new idea and try to cope, and next year we'll be here with the same problems. "Or we start NOW β risk and suffer a little bit, and we'll be better in the next year." π₯π¨Μπππ‘ ππ π’π₯ππ π΅πΉπ€·ββοΈ https://t.co/TZ0p8RXNnm
- Oct 10, 20265.0x their median
Call me toxic and abuse me all you want.... but soon, you will eventually put sentiments aside and agree with me that Michael Carrick is a Caretaker manager. Definitely doesn't have what it takes to take a club the size of Manchester United to the top. https://t.co/mkMYMNsZHz
- Oct 17, 20152.3x their median
Only Messi will prolly make it to 1000 career goals
- Oct 10, 20262.1x their median
Carrick has dropped the ball massively since last season. Selections arenβt working. An over reliance on Maguire-Martinez which looks horrific. Not playing Yoro in his actual position. Not using subs until itβs too late. It is incredibly low.
- Oct 10, 2026
If your team captain under contract came out to say this, I think itβs enough proof for you to erase every hatred left in you against Amorim.. We lost a Gem and I hope we can get someone better and right minded to lead us forward.. https://t.co/KgNF3HrFng
- Oct 10, 2026
That suffering we would have had with RUEBEN AMORIM Weβre now suffering it under Michael Carrick!! But this time carrick doesnβt have a solution!! π
- Oct 10, 2026
I'm in tears rn...I HATE THIS CLUB!!!!!!!!
- Oct 14, 2026
Amorim did something closer to what Lisandro did today, he got sacked. If Lisandro is punished for this, we will confirm that Wilcox is the biggest problem Man Utd have now. Of course we can't excuse the poor performance and poor coaching by Michael Carrick. Anybody involved with the technical bench should go, from the director to the coach. #mufc
- Oct 14, 2026
Dear Nyerere, nina mengi ya kusema. Lakini sijui nianzie wapi...
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 103K followers, an engagement rate of 1.07%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 58K times each, and 1.89% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 56.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 9.8x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nguvumoja, #kariakooderby, #nbcpremierleague.
- What is Allan Lucky (Host: Klub A-Z Podcast)'s engagement rate on X?
- Allan Lucky (Host: Klub A-Z Podcast) (@Allan_Lucky) has an engagement rate of 1.07%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 103,103 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 1.07%, Allan Lucky (Host: Klub A-Z Podcast) sits above the 75th percentile of the 212,925 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Allan_Lucky have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Allan_Lucky post?
- Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.33 posts per day across the measured window.